"No One's EVER Seen This" James O’Keefe BREAKS Epstein Files, FBI RAID Plot & Project Veritas Split
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
James O'Keefe, founder of Project Veritas and OMG Media Group, joins a podcast to discuss his recent documentary, *The Truth Inside Project Veritas*, which details his termination from the organization in early 2023. The film reveals that despite releasing high-profile undercover videos exposing misconduct at major corporations like Pfizer—specifically involving director Jordan Tristan Walker discussing virus mutation strategies—the board members of Project Veritas orchestrated O'Keefe's removal through a series of bizarre and unsubstantiated grievances during an indefinite suspension meeting in February 2023. Key figures on the board, including George Skakel (related to Ethel Kennedy) and Matthew Tiermont, are alleged to have had undisclosed financial conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies that could potentially be sold to Pfizer or other big pharma entities. O'Keefe argues that these board members lacked true loyalty due to their self-interests, leading them to strip him of his CEO title despite having the legal authority to do so himself. The conversation shifts significantly to a controversial FBI raid on O'Keefe's newsroom in 2021, where agents pointed guns at him and seized his reporter's notebooks after he unlocked his phone to call an attorney. O'Keefe asserts that the Department of Justice redacted every word of the probable cause affidavit justifying this search warrant, effectively hiding the true justification for raiding a journalist's home while claiming they were looking for specific items like Ashley Biden's diary which agents already possessed. He contends that by unlocking his phone to contact counsel, he inadvertently gave the FBI access to all signal messages containing government sources, an act he describes as unconstitutional and akin to "constitutional rape." This incident highlights O'Keefe's deep distrust of federal institutions, noting that even liberal groups like the ACLU failed to defend him against what he views as illegal overreach. O'Keefe also addresses the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein investigation and his own role in releasing previously unseen footage from Epstein's private island, including images inside bedrooms and libraries containing satanic-themed books and cryptic chalkboard messages provided by an unnamed high-ranking government source who did not trust the FBI to release them. He challenges current officials like Dan Bono and Cash Patel regarding their refusal to publicly name individuals involved in child sex trafficking despite possessing evidence of "tens of thousands" of hours of such activity. Furthermore, he discusses his theory on how blackmail networks operate within Hollywood and politics, specifically targeting men who identify as gay but present themselves as straight, suggesting that video footage exists on various phones documenting these interactions to control powerful figures like Sean "Diddy" Combs. The interview concludes with O'Keefe reflecting on the dangers of investigative journalism through historical examples such as Gary Webb's suicide after exposing CIA drug trafficking and Andrew Breitbart's death at age 43, which coincided suspiciously with forensic technician Michael Cormier dying from possible arsenic poisoning shortly thereafter. He emphasizes that true journalists must be "true believers" who cannot afford friends in high places to maintain the necessary autonomy and access required for their work, often burning bridges daily. Despite acknowledging the extreme risks—including death by assassination or suicide—he expresses a spiritual conviction that he will survive his mission, wearing an Isaiah 54:17 verse around his neck as protection against weapons formed against him.
Read the full video transcript
No one's ever seen this before. I get
sent this. I'm like, "Holy shit." Mhm.
This is not public.
Someone inside the United States
government gave that to me. That's
correct. The FBI pointed guns at me and
took my reporter's notebooks because I
have to call my lawyer. And the moment
that I unlocked my phone, they snatched
the phone out of my hand because I
unlocked the phone. I go, "Now the FBI
has access to all my signal messages."
Do you know what's in my signal
messages? All the people in the
government that come to me with
information and then they raid your
house. Correct. That is the
justification for the raid against James
O'Keefe. So that means they can do
whatever they want. That's a question
that Dan Bunino and Cash Patel need to
answer. They need to answer. If you want
something that is revolutionary, a
breakthrough, it's Diddy because he's
alive. What is the thing that needs to
be on video in your mind? Oh, it's very
easy for me. Tell me. I've never ever
talked about it on any podcast, right?
Ever. This the first time. I commit to
you that I will do this. This is also
very dangerous. Wouldn't you admit to do
these stories? Well, you you subscribe
to this lifestyle. I almost feel like
they're concerned that I'm going to like
record them trying to bribe me. Mhm.
Which I would
of course.
Did you ever think you would make it? I
feel sweet.
Adam, what's your point? The future
looks bright. My handshake is better
than anything I ever sign. It's right
here.
You are one of my son's right.
[Music]
Oh, he is. Oh, you got to be kidding me.
Yes, he is. Yes. Positive. I'm certain
of it. Yes. We're live right now,
though. We're live. Yeah. So, he is part
of the Ska family. Correct. Yes. So,
okay, folks, first of all, if you're
tuning in, James, the last time we sat
down was February of 2022, roughly three
and a half years. Obviously, nothing's
happened since then for you. Life's been
the same. It's been normal. You know,
everything's going good. But last night,
um, you sent me this, uh, this this, uh,
documentary, and I'm leaving town, so
I'm going out of the country. And I
said, "Listen, let's see if we can do a
podcast before we leave." And then last
night, uh, uh, I sit there, I'm going
through, it's called The Truth of
Project Veritars, part one that just
came out this week. And the more I'm
watching it, I'm like, you got to be So,
this is what happened here. Because
originally when the whole scandal took
place, I like, oh, you know what, James
O'Keefe, what was he up to? He was
spending money. He was doing this. He
was taking helicopter rides. He was
taking one too many Ubers and black cars
and all this stuff. This is what you
kind of see and then your apology
letter. But walk us through what
happened with Project
Veritas. Thank you for having me. U this
film I've released, The Truth Inside
Veritas, takes you inside of Project
Veraritoss, which fired me uh two and a
half years ago. And it shows you what
happened at the board meeting. Yeah.
Yeah. Where they were throwing all these
grievances out at me. You hear the
grievances. You see you meet the
employees and you meet this this board
member in federal court because they
sued me. So they fired me. They
indefinitely suspended me without pay
aka terminated me. So I just started a
new organization called OMG O'Keeffe
Media Group which I've been doing. And
then they sued me to try to shut OMG
down. So, in this deposition footage, in
the video tapes from federal court,
depositions are public proceedings. I
took the depositions, I put them in the
movie, and you see what happened. And
it's an insane story. It's crazy story.
Yeah. What? So, the events, the
sequencing of the events, which is kind
of weird, is when you when you got the
big uh uh Fizer uh one of the directors
that talks about what they were doing.
Rob, if you want to go through the
timeline. So, the sequencing was kind of
weird when you first are uh uh I want to
see if I got the dates here or not. Let
me see. Yeah, right there. January 2023.
You know, we hear about the uh under
your leadership release an undercover
video featuring a man identified as
Jordan Tristan Walker. This is the one
that he's running out. Yeah, this is the
this is the biggest story. This the
biggest story, guys, of the at the peak.
The director the mRNA director of
scientific research advisor talking
about mutating the virus at Fizer. This
video was viewed an insane amount of
times. I confront this guy. If you
remember this, I confronted him with a
microphone and he physically assaulted
me. That's right. I remember that. And
he took the iPad out of my hand and he
smashed it on the ground. This this this
is the the the the gay date, the gay guy
at Fizer. Um YouTube took it down. It's
still on X. And he's talking about
directed evolution uh at Fizer,
something that Fizer denies, but he says
it. He's a director at the company and
we released this video and I confirmed
him in a restaurant in New York City and
a week later I was removed from Project
Veritas. So conspiracy theories were
abound. Did Fizer bribe somebody? Did
they put pressure on people? This is the
guy Jordan Walker. There he is right
there.
Change your music. I remember this guy.
Yeah. This is this is this is a a a Yale
educated doctor director high up within
Fizer Pharmaceutical. And there he is
freaking out. Um uh grabbed the iPad out
of my hand. My cameraman had to in
self-defense push him away cuz he was
physically assaulting me. You could
probably find a better a better video
there. Oh, there's the the one of him
undercover. Click on that. Fizer
ultimately is thinking about mutating
COVID. the undercover journalist asked
and he said, "Well, that is not what we
say to the public." No, no, no. Don't
tell this to any Don't tell anybody what
I'm telling you. Promise me you won't
tell anybody. Can we hear the audio of
this guy saying this, Rob? Go back a
little bit. Yeah, this part. I hope
there's no Titanic music in the
background, but go ahead. Not sure if
you have audio on the and and James,
while he's looking for this, how how in
the world can you expose something like
this, this guy, plain and simple, and
then and nothing happens? Like, nothing
happens. The truth is to him or to let's
stay on this let's see one thing. Let's
stay on this. So while this is happening
while this is happening this is being
released. Okay. Do you have the audio
Rob or No, I do. I uh let's see. You say
that our undercover journalist. So
you're on a date with him or somebody
else is on the co vaccines are
ineffective against virus varants. What
he said is disturbing. Listen to this.
We're exploring like you know how the
virus keeps mutating. Yeah. Well, one of
the things we're exploring is like why
don't we just mutate it hard to so we
could we could create develop new
vaccines, right? So, we have to do that.
If we're going to do that though,
there's a risk of like as you could
imagine, no one wants to be having a
pharma company mutating fibrosis. Yeah.
So, we're like do we want to do this?
So, that's like one of the things we're
considering like the future like maybe
we can like create new versions of the
vaccines and things like that. Okay. See
Fiser ultimately for the audience who
may not remember this. Okay, we reacted
to this multiple times. Okay, but how
high ranking of a person is it? Pretty
high. Okay, pretty high ranking. At the
time when I released this, the the
mainstream media were like, well, we
don't know if that's really a Fiser
director. They denied that this guy was
who he was. I got internal Microsoft
Teams messages from sources within Fizer
that confirmed he was who he said he
was. He's a director high up in the
company two below the chief executive
officer and yeah high ranking guy. Okay.
So when that happens you release that.
What happens? Give me the sequencing of
what happens with project Veritas trying
to fire you. The 25 employees
that turned against you. What happened
then? Yeah. So this was released January
26,
2023. Uh January 25th, pardon me. The
confrontation with was released the very
next day in Brooklyn. It was filmed in a
pizza restaurant in Brooklyn. And then I
was uh board meeting was on February the
6th where they brought in a 6 and 1/2
hour grievance session. Out of 75
employees about 12 employees spoke with
these grievances which is what you
watched in the documentary. And then on
February the 10th they indefinitely
suspended me without pay aka fired me
from Project Veritas. Now, the claims
they made is you fired a CFO and you
fired is it Hinckley or what's his first
name? British Barry Hinckley. Barry
Hinckley. So, he was the chief strategy
officer if I'm not mistaken. Correct.
So, walk me through what their concern
was cuz like you don't have the right to
fire the CFO, the chief strategy
officer. Like, I'm the CEO, the founder.
What do you mean I can't fire? They said
that I was wrong for me to fire the
chief financial officer. Who is they?
The board. The board. These individuals
that you saw on the film, right? They uh
it's got the their names, Matthew
Tiermont, George Skakel,
uh uh other other individuals who no one
knows their names, Joe Barton. But these
board members said James does not have
the authority. And it turns out I did
have the authority. And the chief
financial officer sent me a message on
February the 2nd saying, "We're going to
have an emergency board meeting to
remove you, James O'Keefe, as CEO." I
was like taking off on an airplane at
the time. I was like, "This is the
Twilight Zone. You're" I said, "What are
you going to say to the public? Do you
have a press release written?" They
said, "No, the public doesn't need to
know." So, for me, it was like, "Are you
kidding me?" Like, this was like the
Twilight Zone. Were they using counsel
to threaten you to follow every order
they were giving you or else? Is that
kind of what they were doing to you?
Intimidation or No, no. It was just a
a it's it this is the story of of what
this is such a crazy story. They weren't
threatening me. They were just informing
me that they were going to remove me as
a CEO of the company. So my my number
three guy saying we're going to remove
you and restructure the company. I said,
"Okay, you're fired. This is not going
to happen. This I'm not going to let you
I'm not going to let you do this because
it's going to destroy the organization
if you do this." And this is the phone
call we're having as the airplane is
taking off from Nashville, uh, excuse
me, to Nashville on February the 2nd.
All of this is in this film I just
released. You can hear some of the audio
of what transpired. And then they have
this board meeting on the 6th. That's
Monday, February the 6th, 2023. Some a
week or so after you just video you just
watched. And and that's where you had
this
bizarre struggle session, mauist
struggle session where they brought they
marched in employees and it was almost
like a employees went on strike and said
we don't like James O'Keefe. He's a mean
boss. He works us too hard and they had
these weird grievances and you could
hear all the grievances in the Yeah. One
time apparently you ate a eight-month
pregnant woman sandwich which she later
on came back and talked about. Yes. The
pregnant lady said it didn't happen.
Yeah. She said didn't happen. But they
literally said you ate an eight-month
pregnant women's sandwich. Yeah. I stole
a a pregnant woman's sandwich. Uh I took
Barry Hinckley said, "I took black SUVs
around." He said, "You shouldn't be
transporting the CEO around like this."
Um a bunch of really strange accusations
which never made sense to anybody.
Anybody watching was like, "This is
insane." And questions are what how
could this happen? Why could the so many
things to dive into here about what went
down? So on on George Skakel, Rob, if
you can pull this up now. The George
Skakel I keep pulling up is Ethel
Kennedy's father. Ethel Kennedy married
RFK, the the Bobby Kennedy's father, the
the gen the uh uh uh AG who got
assassinated. So you're saying that
George Skel family is related to the
George Skakel that was one of the board
members? Yes. To be clear, Ethel
Kennedy, the Kennedys and the Skakels
are two famous families. Kennedy's
Democrats, Skakels Republicans. Ethel
Kennedy is the mother of Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. This same Ethel Kennedy is
the aunt of that man right there, George
Skakel. So, they are in fact related.
So, they are in fact related. Okay. So
George Skakel uh one when when the
conversation comes about at the end of
the documentary when he says hey you can
never have a house like this is it all
about money is it how much money do you
make is it all about money for you yeah
I bet you can never have a house like
that and he's got a nice house that's to
the side how did he make his money um
that's not exper that's not exactly
clear to me but his his father's
grandfather founded a company I I forgot
the name of the company big company
probably find it online here. Uh was it
carbide or Union Lake carbide? Some type
of coal processing. Uh so it's
generational money. So it's like a third
generation, fourth generation money.
Correct. Okay, I got it. So when he said
the four the the when they asked the
question and they said so how much money
did uh James O'Keefe steal or whatever
the question was and he said
$785,00023 or
$78523 and he asked the question, so
how'd you come up with that number? I
can't tell you. What was he talking
about? He literally just made it up
under oath. He was flippant. He was
being flip. It's a remarkable piece of
footage. He's under oath. This is a
federal deposition. Your audience might
be asking, "How can O'Keeffe play
courtroom videos?" Depositions aren't
under seal, meaning they're public
proceedings. This video taped. He's
under oath in a federal courtroom
proceeding. And the attorney asks, "You
alleged that James O'Keeffe owes you
money or stole money? How much did James
steal?" And right, he has it. He found
it. Watch this clip. What you owe first
and then we can start talking about it.
I'm interested to know how much you Yes.
Sorry. Um
uh play back speed to normal. There you
go. Watch this. Oh, $785,00023.
How did you arrive at that figure? With
a very very complicated algorithm. I
cannot reveal because it's confidential
and it's based on the employment
agreement. Obviously, it looks very
honest here. Yeah. How many violations
did you identify? 27. 27 violations of
the employment agreement
and that led you to what figure? I just
told you I'm not repeating my answer.
Is that analysis in your documents you
provided yesterday? Is it done in your
head? Uh partially. Where else? Well,
I'm allow I'm not allowed to disclose
that. I mean, these people were just
impeaching all of their credibility.
Okay. So, so this guy George Skakel when
he's saying that prior to them coming
after you, you dropped the Fiser thing
that it talks about four companies he's
invested in. One of them, I don't know
how many of them was pharma. What What
was his link? If there is any theories
to say, well, the reason why he did this
because they got a phone call saying
this. What are some speculations that
you have that caused them to want to
fire you right after the biggest story
you guys ever dropped uh uh with Project
Veritas? Well, there was another clip in
the in the deposition. and you could
pull it up here in a minute, but he says
that uh these companies could, this is
his quote, could be sold to Fizer.
That's right. That's what he says. And
these companies now I now when you're in
a nonprofit organization that
investigates these things, we have to
sign a conflict of interest policy,
right? And this is very important in my
in my business, infinitely more
important than any other business. If
you have financial investments in these
kind, you have to disclose that. I did
not know this, but every one of my board
members were co-investing in these
companies without my knowledge. I They
were soliciting money from each other to
put into these companies and I didn't
know it until I got to this lawsuit. Uh,
and this is an ongoing lawsuit. He found
it. This is the clip. If you want to
play that clip, Rob about three or four
companies. You just had it. Y go for it.
transparency. Only thing that has
changed is that we broke the biggest
story in our organization's history. It
was a story that was so big that it was
a combination of the board thinking they
finally could do this without James
O'Keeffe, but also maybe some conflicts
of interest per their own words. Is it
fair to say that three of the four
companies you've invested in you would
consider to be in the medical field? or
petrogen could be sold to a big pharma
like fizer.
You agree with me what fizer could be a
candidate for maybe potentially. Yeah. I
mean, you know, I think if I was a
banker, you'd be crazy not to let Fiser
know that it was available. Yeah. It
turns out I I was up against all these
people who were financially
aligned really deposit right there, Ron.
Yeah. So, three or four companies,
James, the the board members that you
had. Mhm.
If you can give a one, how did you find
them? Two, profile because if I'm if I'm
on your board and you you're having to
raise $2 million a month because this
thing takes a lot of work. The whole $24
million you were talking about, they
said, "Well, we want you to stop raising
money. How the hell do you want the
company to run? We can't raise money."
Yeah. So if if you bring these guys in,
don't they have to be
100% locked in to realize who you are?
Like everybody knows, you know, what
you're going to do and what you're not
going. You're an acorn guy. When you
drop that whole acorn story going to an
event with an underage hooker that you
showed up to as a pimp. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. Come on in. Come on in. Come on
in. And I think you were with Breitbart
at that time if I'm not mistaken. That's
right. Yes. So, don't they don't these
guys who are part of your board members
know who they have as the product that
they're marketing? The problem was
nobody was willing to be on my board.
The people that I trusted and respected
the most said, "I can't be on your
board." I'll write you a $100,000 check.
Tax. This is nonprofit. Tax deductible
money. Someone even wrote us a half a
million dollar check, but he says, "I
can't be on your board because I, you
know, it's too risky for me. The
liabilities, Pat, the liabilities of
what I do approach
infinity. I've been sued dozens of
times. There's no, at least not yet. I
hope to make it sustainable and
profitable. There's no profit in this.
You can't become wealthy doing this.
Why? Because you get sued so much. And
the legal fees on the balance sheet, the
liabilities always outweigh the assets.
So, you have to be a little nuts, at
least in the right way to do this. You
have to be You're fully nut. No, you you
are you're qualified to be certain ways
I am. But the problem is is if you self
the self-interest is a very powerful
motivator for people and the instinct
for self-preservation is extremely
powerful. So when you get raided by the
FBI, which we were in 2021, a year
before this happened, and you're getting
sued by everybody, the problem is is if
you're not messianic, if you're not
missiondriven, you'll corruption, why
would you let them be on your board? I
So that was my mistake. That was my
mistake. I did not discern this and I
and I had a founders board. I knew these
guys from 10 years prior, right? When I
was scrapping, when I had nothing and
they were willing. So I so so the
mistake that I made is they were willing
to be on the board and I said,
"Okay, and I couldn't find anybody." The
hardest thing about How many do you
need? What's that? How many board
members do you need?
501c3s require a minimum of three, but
you really should have five optically
over. How many did you have at the peak?
I had three at Veraritoss, 51c3, and
then I had three at 51c4 and they
combined the boards when they did this.
They just put everyone on the same
board. So, six, that's an even number
though. Is it is it a six equal voting
or the one that votes on a 501c4 doesn't
have influence over the 501c3? There
were only three board members when they
when they did this and it was a two to
one vote. Just a two to one vote all.
Who was the one? Well, I was the the
third board member. So I was opposed of
course to this. So it was Tmont and
Garvey, John Garvey. And then they
combined the other board which was
George Skakel and Joe Barton and a man
named Steve Lemik who's now deceased. So
it became four to one. It became five to
one. Five to one. Okay. So profile of
those guys, excuse me. Four to2 when
Steve voted against it. He the one that
passed away. Correct. So he was with
you. He actually committed suicide.
You can't make this stuff up. It was a 4
to2 vote when they combined the boards
and they voted to indefinitely sus
suspend. Yeah. He committed suicide.
Correct. What was the timeline of when
he committed suicide?
Um it was within the year after this
happened. And is there any stories of
why he is it nonrelated to this event?
This event caused so much trauma that he
just didn't want to deal with it. I
don't know. It may be it may be
unrelated. I don't know. Okay. Maybe
unrelated. Of the four board members
that were against you, we just learned a
little bit about Skakel. Can you tell us
a little bit about the other three?
Absolutely. And there should be some
clips in this film to to back up what
I'm saying. As you know, I like to make
factual statements. There's Matthew
Tamond was the was the number one uh
orchestrator, the the the top guy. And
I'll you want me to take you through a
little bit of each of these guys? Matt
Tierman, I was on a boat in the Bahamas,
Pat, about eight, nine years ago with a
big big supporter, a big philanthropist.
And he said to me, you have to beware of
this man. I said, why? He said, because
this man is incredibly jealous of you,
James, and he wants to be you. You need
to get him off your board. Now, at the
time, I didn't know what that meant. I
was like, oh, what does that mean? He
admires me. I didn't have any life
experience to inform me what could
happen to someone who wants to be you.
But apparently, people saying this guy
was very envious. He he wanted to, you
know, to to to be me or to have what I
have, whatever that we could talk about
that. That's Matthew Tiermont, the guy
who orchestrated everything. And there
are some insane pornographic obscene
messages he sent me. Now, Matthew
Tiermon was soliciting the board members
to put money into his companies that he
was is for-profit Wall Street. He worked
on Wall Street. He he he has an
economics degree from the University of
Chicago. his father was a famous a
famous Polish anti-communist dissident.
A lot of these guys had fathers who were
wealthy and famous. So, one theory is
that they lived in the shadow of their
fathers. We could talk more about him in
in a minute. There's George Skakel who
we've been talking about. There's a man
named Joseph Barton. There's federal
deposition clips of him in the film. Joe
Barton said some pretty crazy things in
his deposition. He said, "I'm not
entitled to a private life." So, these
guys were publishing uh messages about
my personal life with my girlfriend.
There's a man named John Garvey who has
is about to be deposed. He hasn't yet
been deposed. And then there's Steve
Almic who committed
suicide. Those are the board members. Of
the four, how many of them have you had
communication with since they fired you?
These guys have been obsessively, I mean
obsessively, posting and tweeting on X
about me. non-stop for the last two
years. Crazy stuff, demonic stuff. You
wouldn't even believe me unless I pulled
it up on the screen. One of the ones,
uh, which one was the one that kept
texting you, I love you. Listen, I'm I
feel so bad about what's going on and
then afterwards, you're my [ __ ]
You know, all this stuff. So, how often
did that happen? Was that board members
or was were those employees? You're
referring to in the film, these are
these are some of the employees. Now,
now again at Project Gard, people don't
realize when I came on your show, we had
like 65 70 employees. That's that's a
lot of people. And and you saw about 12
or so were acting in this demonic way.
You're referring to a couple of the
younger employees who were behaving like
this. So, they came in the boardroom,
they said,
"Okay. He's a power drunk tyrant." And
then a week later, they would send me an
Instagram. I'm so sorry. I feel horrible
for what I did. I never should have did
this. And then like a few months later,
they're calling me. I can't even say it
on the air, but
horrible, you know, expletative words on
on uh on DMs. So now, are you at a point
that are we because to us when it
happened, the first thing I said is I
don't know what Project Veritas is
without O'Keefe. And I know they don't
like to hear that. You know, a lot of
times people think, you know, certain
organizations can get the same kind of
same kind of results without the face.
Most companies can survive without a
face. Most companies could. And you're
like, "Oh my god, Apple will never make
it without Steve Jobs. Apple goes from a
hundred billion auto company. When Steve
Jobs dies, Tim Cook did a great job.
It's a three trillion auto company. He
30x what Steve Jobs had." Right? But
this is a small nonprofit that like when
I said you're crazy enough to do stuff
like this, the average person doesn't
wake up saying, "Let me go expose Fizer
in the middle of all the [ __ ] that's
going on. Let me go expose Acorn and
have the guy I work with suddenly have a
heart attack that nobody knows what's
going on." And then Michael Cormier, who
is the leading inves, I don't know what
what role he had, and then he all of a
sudden dies. And they don't know what he
died from. They're saying arsenic
poisoning in the LA corer's office. The
average person doesn't want to do your
job. The average person just wants to
consume the content you create. So
project Veritas, we saw one of the
recent clips. And the most common
question everybody asks is, "Wait a
minute. Why does it say Veritoss and
OMG, right? O'Keefe Media Group." What
was that all about? Are you at a point
right now where Veritas is coming back
under you or not yet? Yeah. So they're
they're on the verge of bankruptcy. They
when I when I was raising $2 million a
month, $24 million a year. It's a a lot
of money to raise as a nonprofit.
Remember, there's no annuities. You have
to ask people for money constantly. And
when they got rid of me, the donations
just stopped. Everybody wanted their
money back. And in that board meeting, I
had one trump card because these guys
were it was like a struggle session.
They just wanted to make me feel abused.
It was a lot of envy and just petty
human things that this is not unique. It
happens in a lot of organizations. But
to your point, what are they going to do
if they get rid of the guy who's the the
raising all the funds? They didn't have
an answer and they didn't care. Now, in
the movie, I I noticed your producer had
that 54-minute movie. If you can find
this moment where it's about 3/4 of the
way through towards the end of that
board meeting, uh that's the guy Matthew
Tiermon. You just saw him on the screen
right there. There was a quote that's
incredibly important. And I said, I
point of order, what are you guys going
to do? Because that's that's the trump
card I had. What's your plan? Okay, you
want to lash me, you want to crucify me,
you want to make me feel abused. And
Tman says something and I hope we can
pull it up. That that same guy, he goes,
we have 65 employees. We're going to be
fine without James O'Keefe. They
actually believed or they wanted to
believe. Not for a product like this.
But but but you see that's so
interesting about human nature, isn't
it? Because when you're that envious,
when you're that resentful, when you're
that deluded, uh there it is right
there. You got it. 65 employees. You saw
you just passed a moment ago. My
question is what what is the plan of of
uh if you implement this solution?
Project is an organization that has 65
incredibly talented individuals who are
capable of doing journalism. We don't
believe that there will be any lost
output uh on the margins. Cut. There it
is. So, they actually believed that
there wouldn't be any lost output on the
margins. Literally, the exact opposite
happened. Every donor wanted their money
back. Nobody trusted anything they had
to say. Now, they believed, but content
is king. Our journalism matters. But the
problem, what they failed to understand
is investigative journalism is all about
trust.
And if you behave like this, nobody's
going to trust anything that you report.
And I think that's what they failed to
understand. But Matthew Tier actually
believed that Project Veraritoss didn't
need James O'Keefe anymore. So, and they
also apparently lost 200,000 followers
like within days of us, you know, the
audience finding out that you're no
longer tied to them. So, even the
Veritoss account, I don't know what it
was, but but I saw somewhere that they
lost a couple hundred thousand followers
as well. So what what number did that
$24 million go down to? The revenue you
mean? Yes. Zero. Ne negative equity.
There was a one individual, I can't name
the donors under the freedom of
association under the first amendment,
but one donor said, "I want my $1
million check back." The chief financial
officer said, "It's unlawful for us to
return your check." That's not true. The
donors wanted their money back. So they
went they went deeply into into debt.
So, when I left, there was somewhere
around
$10 million in cash and no debt. No
debt. And and uh and now they're like $2
million in debt with no cash. So, are
you going to is it going to come back to
you? Is that where you are where
eventually? And people, your audience
might be wondering, well, why can't
O'Keeffe talk about the specifics of the
of the negotiations? Because I promised
the court I won't, and I'm a man of my
word. on settlement negotiations. You
can't talk about the details. I can talk
about the proceedings. That's public. I
just can't talk about the details of the
so-called settlement, you know, the the
uh the talks of uh acquiring or getting
the information back. All I can tell you
is that I'm in talks to to to reacquire
project veritas. When you put that
project veritas on the back of that most
recent video that you did, why did you
do that? Because we had filmed a video
in front of that brick brick wall. uh
brick brick wall backdrop. We literally
brick by brick rebuilt the project
veritas studio here in uh West Palm
Beach, Florida where I now I now live
because I was about to imminently about
to announce that I'm reacquiring Project
Veritas. Oh, so it wasn't finalized yet.
So did you have permission from them to
use that? Can you use that? Was that a
conversation? I'm going to the There is
no there is no trademark uh of of the of
the of the of the uh logo. In fact, I've
I've applied for the trademark myself,
so I'm allowed to use it. Okay. I'm
allowed to report the same reason I'm
allowed to report on the court
proceedings. For sure. Well, I mean,
look, the the work you do and did is not
everyone's work. Uh uh it's not
something everyone wants to do nor can
do in the manner that you do it because
you stay poised and calm in the moments
that you're in and you get in the faces
of people yet still stay respectful.
That's that's not easy for people to do
because some people in that moment they
get so
emotional and then they don't know how
to come down. You stay. So you can't
even train somebody to be like that. You
either have it or you don't have it. one
can get better but you can't just train
someone to say why can't you do what
O'Keefe does it's not a skill set they
can teach anybody so hopefully to go to
that direction because I think your job
is a very important job to move on is
there anything else you want to tell the
audience before we move on from this
story because obviously we're going to
put the link below to go watch the
documentary
but any final thoughts on this story uh
couple things number one you can watch
the movie
O'Keefeagroup.com it's $9 people say why
are you charging for journalism well
most of the most of the journalism I
don't charge for, but I think this movie
is incredibly cinematic. I know you
watched it yesterday. It's a it's an
incredible experience and it's a really
story about human nature. This is about
human nature. How do I build an an
organization? It's not really a
business. I mean, it is a business, but
it's it's a mission. How do you create a
sustainable entity, a team of people
going after the most powerful people in
the world, which I will continue to do.
We're about to talk about Epstein, all
these other things I'm doing right now.
How do you build that without it getting
corrupted, without people lying about
you to the FBI to protect their
families? Right? These are really hard
questions that I haven't yet fully
figured out yet. I'm learning. I'm
experimenting. Nobody does this. So, I'm
trying to create a sustainable
organization that can do it at
scale. and to be fired from the company
that I created and to build something
from nothing. You mentioned in the film
George Kel says you can't afford my
house. That statement said so much about
him, didn't it? Anybody who says that
you can't afford my house, it I don't
know if you can play that real quick all
the way at the end. This is the thing
that actually struck people the all the
things in the film. It's the very last
like thing that happens in the movie. Uh
this really struck people and it says so
much about the character of these
people. It's about like they're
literally standing. That's right there.
Right there. Play it at the line. The
loyalty.
George, were you an investor in the same
company as Matt Turmont? Some of them.
You didn't disclose that. But I didn't I
wasn't an investor in the companies
while I was on your board. While you're
on the board?
Yes. I think I was on the board then.
You weren't? No. When did you become an
investor? After I left left your board.
Is that right? How much did you invest
in each of Matt Tierman's companies?
Watch this. I don't think that's any of
your business. I think it is. How much
did you We have a disagreement. Are you
refusing to answer the question? Yes. I
want to talk about your investments in I
want to talk about you. How much money
did you spend? How much money did you
spend on private helicopters? I wasn't
particularly concerned about the
financial stuff. There is no reason for
me to disclose anything. My personal
investments. Yes. That's ridiculous.
Well, you said you're a businessman and
Fiser could be a buyer. What did you
mean by that? What did you mean? I
invest in businesses. That's not news.
It's about making money. That's how I
make Yeah. It's all about making money,
isn't it? How do you think I paid for
this? Is it all about money? Too bad you
can't afford that. There it is right
there. So, you're a liar. Yeah. Well,
it's all about money, isn't it? It's all
about money.
Because I'm not a business guy. It's all
about money, isn't it? This was my one
of my closest my closest associates. So
it was almost like an uncle to me. And
unfortunately Pat you know I I I think I
would say the last comment is I don't
know whether the commercial imperative
the profitm mechanism is compatible with
absolute
truthtelling. When I watch the people
closest to I mean this guy was an uncle
figure his wife was like my second
mother and money just unfortunately
tends to corrupt.
So that's it's a deeper more
philosophical concept. I just wanted to
get that out and and tell you that I'm
working on it. And I think the solution
is to find really strong people with
really strong convictions who are not
for sale and unbreakable. And if I can
surround myself with those types of
people, I think I'll we'll be okay.
That's a perfect transition into the one
video clip. Rob, if you can about your
life, right? We've all seen this clip.
Vinnie, you love this clip. Can you Rob,
is there music in this one? I think
there is, right? I believe there is. Is
it going to be okay to play it with the
music? As long as we comment. It's on
YouTube shorts without music, too.
Whichever your preference is, this will
work. What is the message of it, Rob?
Uh, if the price isn't your life, then
you're for sale. Yep. Let me see if I
can find it on YouTube without the
music. See if you can YouTube shorts is
without music.
I mean, the music adds a It adds It adds
something to it. You feel like you want
to cry.
Yeah, there it is. Is that the one?
That's it. without me. Okay, go forward.
Price. Is it 10 million? Back to the
beginning cuz it clipped out. Is it 20
million? What is your price? There you
go. Is it 10
million? Is it 20 million? Is it 100
million? What is your price? Because if
your price is not your life, then you
are for sale.
[Music]
If your price is not your
life, then you are for sale. Wow.
So if you're going to be a trutht
teller, your price has to be your life.
I can't surround myself with people
whose price is not their life because
the enemy, whatever the enemy is,
whether it be physical, legal,
spiritual, will will will attack the
vulnerability of the person who can be
compromised. So you get real spiritual
real fast. Uh if you're going to do this
type of work, what is your price, James?
And I've I've I've seen this multiple
times. I've shared it with people. We've
played on the podcast. I think what
you're doing, you're you're hands down
the the best journalist. You don't give
a [ __ ] You even said right now that
you're not in the like what what money
are you making from exposing the truth?
I know it's it's going to be damn near
impossible to trust every single person
because what you said about the money
situation, but in regard to this video,
James, with the price life, has anybody
I'm pretty sure they have, approached
you of any people of power that have
tried to offer, maybe a Soros, maybe
somebody to tell you like, James, shut
up. Here's money. We'll give you this.
Disappear. Leave us alone. It's it's a
very
interesting. Yeah, this one. And I
remember you you DM'd me. I I appreciate
that very much. You were very touched by
this. At the time, people were you could
hear the murmurss in the crowd. These
are men twice my age. Yes. Just a simple
statement. They're like, "Whoa." Yeah.
What a concept.
Yeah. Yeah, it's I mean this is not you
know these are these are
um there have been a couple times in
meetings where people have the closest
thing I could say whereas a person of
wealth would ask me to do something and
I would say I I can't I can't this is
not an exchange of goods and services. I
can't do something in exchange for you
paying me to do it. That's not how I
work as a journalist. I have to operate
impartially without fear. And then when
the person realized where I was coming
from, they kind of backed off. They're
like, "Oh, I no, that's okay." I almost
feel like they're concerned that I'm
going to like record them trying to
bribe me, which I would,
of course, that's who you are. So, when
they realize when they when they when
they danced on that precipice and they
realized where I was coming from, I
think they realized, "Oh, Keefe could
expose me." And to their credit, they
back off. And there's that interesting
dance where they're maybe they're in
their minds trying to corrupt me, but
they then realize I could expose them.
Yeah. So, there's been that. Yeah. So,
so you know, you hear a message like
that with life and you know, your life's
on the line and some of the stories you
pursue. Now, here's the thing.
Politically, James, what would you say
you are politically?
I don't even know anymore. I I say the
truth. I did a story on Pam Bondi.
That's exactly what I'm doing. And I
took I took a hit. I was we I think I I
I tell stories by way of example because
I think it's better than abstractions. I
did a story on the attorney general of
the United States and it was hard for me
because I don't dislike her or or or
like her. It's not about whether I like
someone or dislike them. It's about
whether the public has a right to know
the information I'm exposing.
I tend to have been branded as a
conservative only because I felt the
legacy media in the last decade and two
decades has been
uh not telling the truth. And if you do
tell the truth, then you're branded as a
right-winger. But I don't even know what
these terms mean anymore. I really don't
know what it means to be a liberal or
conservative anymore. Do you? I don't I
don't understand. I think conservative
values are pretty uh uh clear. I think
liberal values are not today. They're
confused. But conservative values,
family, you know, country, you know, uh,
uh, America first, making sure we're not
going for nonsense wars where people's
kids are, you know, fighting a war
that's unnecessary because somebody's
making money on the back end and deals
are getting done. Faith, freedom of
speech, th those are conservative
values, right, that I would say they're
there. watching you, I would say you
have you have well constitutionalist,
you know, I'm I'm a very strong first
amendment perhaps one could say
absolutist
uh for on the first amendment with some
exceptions. So I would say I believe and
for example one of one of my values and
virtues is I believe in equal justice
before the law. I think the law should I
know that it's impossible but we should
try to emulate this. We should the law
should treat people equally. Some would
say that's a conservative value, right?
That's a that's an American and and
quite conservative value. And I also
believe in the freedom of speech and I'm
an absolutist when it comes to that.
Yeah. And and and where I'm going with
this is the following. So video comes
out because a a lot of conservatives
were told on day one, week one, you
know, we're going to find out about
Epstein, 911, MLK, John F. Kennedy.
We're going to find all that stuff out.
And we've been wanting it for a while to
see what's going on with this, who's
behind it, especially the last few years
at a whole different level. And we're
gonna find out who the assassination
attempt was. Was was he tied to anybody?
Was Thomas tied to anybody? And then we
all see the same clip that you've seen,
right? It's the clip with Banino and
Cash Patel. Yes. If if you can pull that
clip up, Rob. And you know, these are
two men that almost anybody who know I
think that's the one right there. Almost
anybody that knows them would call them
patriots, right? Yeah. They've served
their country. They've given their lives
to the country. Dan has at the highest
level. So has Cash Patel. And then we
see this clip here that throws a lot of
people off. Go forward, Rob. You said
Jeffrey Epstein committed
suicide. People don't believe it. Well,
I mean, listen, they have a right to
their opinion, but as someone who has
worked as a public defender, as a
prosecutor who's been in that prison
system, who's been in the Metropolitan
Detention Center, who's been in
segregated housing, um, you know, a
suicide when you see one and that's what
that was. He killed himself. You again,
you want me to get I've I've seen the
whole file. He killed himself. I know
it's hard work. you said and and you saw
people that have done uh body language,
you know, Dan looks uncomfortable saying
what he's saying. The way he answered
it, you can tell they've role played
that and you know they now this is
purely what people are speculating,
right? And then you have this one clip
with Pam Bondi, correct? If you have the
Pam Bondi one. maybe walk us through
what's going on here before we I don't
know if you want me to narrate live as
opposed to watching me on the screen
narrating, but perhaps we go we go to
the beginning of where you see Pam Bondi
on the hidden camera. So, I I'll just
talk live what I said on the C. Okay.
So, there she is at the White House. Go
back to the beginning of that clip of
her life. So, that was a tough one for
me to publish because I I I uh you asked
if I'm political and I think I'm you
know, you have to decide who you want to
be. Are you a political operative or are
you a journalist? And to be a
journalist, it's hard because you have
to do things like this. Pam Bondi um was
caught in a restaurant telling a
stranger, a nanny, on uh April 28th or
so that there are tens of thousands of
videos involving little
children. Now, I didn't target her. I
didn't seek to get this. People send me
stuff. Sometimes I have undercover
people all over the country and they
happen to get a conversation in an
airport. I get sent this. I'm like,
"Holy, holy shit." This is not public.
The attorney general of the United
States, and by the way, Cash, I believe
the FBI reports to her. So, this is the
top dog. Yep. Is saying to a nanny in a
restaurant something that no one knows.
And to me, I'm like, well, that that's
an interesting story, is it not? So, I
do what I have to do. I reach out to the
attorney general's office for comment. I
say the, you know, Pam Bondi, the
attorney of the United States, was
caught in a restaurant saying, and I
actually wonder whether I should have
done that. I I probably did him a favor
by by by giving them the exact
quotes. And then a few days later, she
says the exact same thing publicly that
I emailed the attorney general's office
for comment, saying, and played the clip
of her at the White House. This is what
she said. of thousands of videos of
Epstein with children or child porn.
Now, this is the first time an official
has publicly acknowledged that videos of
Epstein and his victims exist. What you
may not know is just 9 days prior, the
attorney general had a very similar
conversation with a total stranger in a
restaurant. Do you know when the Epstein
files are going to get released? Um, we
hope soon.
Okay. So, any dates? No. You know what
it is? There tens and thousands of
videos. Yeah. And it's all with little
kids. So, they have to go through
everyone in the So, it's interesting
because she said it privately in a
restaurant to well publicly publicly
publicly in a restaurant, not privately.
And to me, it's like that's something
something. So, I felt like I had to
publish this. Now, if she hadn't have
gone publicly and said this and I had
released this clip in the restaurant, it
would have been a much much much bigger
deal. But it does raise questions,
doesn't it? Why is this Why are they not
being transparent with the American
people? Why are they telling a nanny in
a restaurant? So, it raises questions to
your point about Cash. I know Cash a
little bit. I think he is a good man.
And I mean that I based upon what I know
about him. I don't know Dan as much, but
I also think he's a good man. I don't
trust the bureaucracy that reports to
them. And if you put any good man and
and the most ethical person at the top
of that bureaucracy, I I I think you're
setting them up for failure. Let me give
you a specific example of where I'm
coming from. I was raided by the FBI.
Shortly before I I met you, the FBI
pointed guns at me and took my
reporter's notebooks. They just recently
closed the case against me a few months
ago. the FBI in February of this year
and they gave me back my phones that
they had for three and a half years.
When you get a when you get a search
warrant to conduct a raid, you have to
go to a judge, right, with a reason. Oh,
we have this probable cause, the reasons
why to
raid. When you close a case, which is
very rare for the FBI to execute a
search warrant and not bring charges, it
hardly ever happens. You are required by
law to give a copy of the probable
cause. That is the reason why you
conducted the raid. Guess what they did?
They redacted every single word of the
probable cause used to raid my newsroom.
Every word. Maybe your producer can pull
it up on Google or something. I every
word. There's a black bar, Pat through.
It's a It's a It's a It's ridiculous.
It's literally black bars. And we're not
talking about terrorists. We're not
talking about Jeff Epstein. We're not
talking about child molesters and drug
traffickers. talking about James
O'Keefe, the
journalist. So, if our
FBI, our attorney general's office,
can't be transparent about why they
raided a journalist's
newsroom, why do we have any faith in
the FBI to be transparent about these
other these other issues? That's where
I'm coming from on this. And is this is
this is this in regard to the Ashley
Biden diary? Correct. This is it, right?
because you exposed cuz somebody
contacted you and told them that they
found the diary of the daughter of the
president of United States staying a
bunch of stuff and also claiming that
her father showered with her probably at
inappropriate ages and then they raid
your house. Correct. Yeah, it's an
affidavit. It's on my uh go down go
down. Uh it's project journalist
detained devices seized. This is not it,
but it's on my ex page. Um there's a
there's a there's on page 47 of the
affidavit.
Um, every word is redacted. I mean, I I
I was
enraged. The AC, the American Civil
Liberties Union, which is a liberal
group, came to my defend. This is like
this is crazy. You take if if another
country like Ukraine or Russia or North
Korea did this, our State Department
would. So, my my point is I don't have a
lot of faith in these institutions. I
just don't. What do you think happens
when they get in? That's what I want to
know because to me There it is right
there. I apologize. I I apologize. Could
you just I apologize. Interrupt. Is that
real? That's a real That's a real
document. Can you zoom in, please? Like
what? It says prob probable cause
justifying search of O'Keefe's person
and premises. Every single word is
redacted. They even redacted the
footnote. So So isn't this insane?
There's more of this. That means they
can do whatever they want and they don't
have to show you why they came in your
house. It's it's literally it's a viol.
Look at this. The whole thing. Keep
going, Rob. Like, okay. All right. I see
what they did there. Okay. Wait, wait,
wait. There's something unredacted. Read
the bottom. What's the bottom? Read
that. Based upon my train, this is an
FBI agent. I have learned, among other
things, that cell phones are capable of
sending emails. Great. Are you kidding
me? I'm shocked I didn't redact that.
This is not Saturday Night Live. And
then it goes on to the rest of the
affidavit. But the previous three pages
are the probable cause. That is the
justification for the raid against James
O'Keefe. And James, if you don't mind,
what were they looking for? The diary?
They weren't looking for the diary was
they already they already had that. They
What were they Well, that's a loaded
question. Were they really trying to do?
What were they really trying to They
were really trying to get inside my cell
phone because people in the government
come to me with information which as a
reporter I have a right to receive and
they don't like that. Of course. Of
course. Now, if you think about Did you
give them the password to your cell
phone? This is another very interesting
story because you know what happened
with Ron Johnson where when they walked
up to his house and they took his phone
and the rule of thumb if you ever hand
your phone over never you you're not
supposed to give the passport. How did
they get into your phone? This is a
crazy story. They bang on the door and
it's the loudest pounding you know it's
the feds. You just know. And I go to the
door. I'm like I'm opening the door
because you know they're going to shoot
me and I'm and then they open they put
me in handcuffs. I think I'm under
arrest. They say no. This is a search
warrant. I say, 'I want to speak to my
lawyer. I say over and over again, I
want to speak to my lawyer because I
learned I was arrested 10 years prior.
Don't talk to the FBI. Just don't. Even
if you're
innocent. They say, would you like to
use the iPhone on your nightstand? I
said, "Yes." And then I I unlock the
phone because I have to call my lawyer.
And the moment that I unlocked my phone,
they snatched the phone. Not get out of
here. This is Holy [ __ ] They they
snatch the phone out of my hand because
I unlocked the phone. And then the FBI
agent like almost almost to to torture
me in front of me. He goes to the
settings and he changes the settings to
make it not go to sleep. Wow. And then
they put the phone in an evidence bag.
Now the FBI has access to all of my
signal messages. Do you know what's in
my signal messages? All the people in
the government that come to me with
information. Wow. So, the Department of
Justice, this is the Biden Department of
or the uh a month before Trump was
elected in 2020.
Excuse me. Biden was elected in 2020.
Now, they have access to all of my
sources. Jesus. So, this is what gets
considered to be a constitutional raping
because the the American Bill of Rights
have special protections for reporters
and and I'm the you're talking to the
only newsroom that has ever been raided
by the FBI. We're the only ones that
have ever been raided and they did it
just to get the information. So, what's
behind all those black bars? I believe
confidential FBI informants. Of course,
people who lied to the FBI to set me up.
So, I could tell you so many war
stories, guys, but you asked me
questions about cash and Dan Bonino.
They're great guys. I think they mean
well, but if you put me in charge of the
FBI, I wouldn't know what to do. I mean,
how do you trust a bureaucracy like that
where people behave that, by the way,
that is totally illegal? You can't take
a gun, point it against your forehead,
and say, "Give me your reporter's
notebooks." If that happened in Eastern
Europe, our State Department would be
issuing sanctions against that country.
But it happened in New York. Yeah. So,
so can I ask one question, James? So,
they promise all this day one we're
going to do this, day one, we're going
to do that. What do you think happened?
Meaning they're in now. Donald Trump is
the president. He's told them, "Go
ahead, you guys do whatever you want."
What? Who who who makes a Pam Bondi, a
Dan Bondino, a Cash Patel all of a
sudden change her tunes and not release
what we know because James at the end of
the day she even said tens of thousands
I'm assuming James is let's say 30,000
hours of grown men having sex with
children and James I don't know if
you're familiar in the movie JFK Jim
Garrison says and I quote let justice be
done though the heavens fall which
basically means going after truth no
matter how powerful the people and no
matter what happens to the system. So
what happens? What what do you think?
They go in and who who tells them you
are not releasing any of this because
our friends and blah blah blah are
attached to it. I I don't know if anyone
tells them. I mean some have said they
they put you in a skiff. This is this is
more of a this is not a fact. This is
speculation. But a funny notion that
might illustrate what could happen is
you know that image of JFK getting shot.
Yes. Do they put the leaders in a skiff?
That's a secure compartmentalized
information facility. Do they show the
Zaprruder film of JFK getting shot and
said, "You better do what we tell you to
do." Or that could be you. Now, I'm not
saying they did that to these gentlemen.
And I actually genuinely mean this. I've
met Cash. I think he's a genuinely good
man. I just don't I think the system is
institutionally corrupt. And everyone
says, you know what they said to me,
Pat? Oh, call Cash. He'll help you out.
Call Bam. Call Pam. Yeah. Like I got
them on speed dial. They're getting
asked for 10,000 favors a day. I don't
have I don't have any money to give
them. They're the system is so broken
when you need the guy at the top to be
so influential. It's the system. It's
the article 3 judges. It's the courts.
It's the line prosecutors. The agents in
my apartment. Do you know that when the
agents were in my apartment, I could
tell by the looks on their faces that
they didn't want to be there? They're
like, "This is this is this is crazy.
This is this is wrong. But they did it.
You speculate a little bit. What do you
think happens when they get in? Because
they tend to change when they get in.
Talking about the FBI agents, anybody
and everybody that the moment they get
in and the whole quote by Mario Cuomo,
people campaign in uh poetry, but they
govern in pros. You know, once they go
in, you know, they used to communicate
and talk to you. Now the only way they
talk to you is with emojis. You know,
hey, when they were campaigning, they
wanted to talk to you regularly. I want
to come on the podcast. I want to do
this. I want to do that. And then all of
a sudden they're in they're they're more
uh uh quiet about what do you think
happens when politics politics I'm
working on a story right now one of the
directors of the agencies they mean well
they go into FEMA they go on the IRS
they have all these notions of freedom
and prosperity and eliminating waste
fraud and abuse but then they get in
there and they're such snakes in these
entities just I you know I mean DC it's
a land of phonies and narcissists
they're not attracted to do the right
thing. They want power and money and
sex. Are we are we under some delusion
that the people in Washington want
something other than power and money and
sex? What percentage of the people in
Washington inside these agencies are
actually there to do the right thing?
What percent for real are are we naive
and foolish enough to think that
people are in these places? I think they
start off wanting to do the right thing
and then through peer pressure they get
they get forced or there's a few people
or there's a few people that are there
who do the right thing but there's so
many snakes and manipulative look at
what happened to me look why I'm on your
show I started my own institution
because I didn't want to be part of the
snakes and and the snakes infiltrate and
I I think in some regards it's human
nature um and this is a really good
question you're asking. I'm learning in
real time. I started an institution
because I didn't trust institutions and
then I'm removed from my own institution
by snakes. Yeah. Hello everyone. I'm
James O'Keefe. Been doing this
journalism thing for about 20 years.
Truth, justice, exposing corruption,
everything that comes along with it. If
you want to connect with me, talk to me
about any of this, you can connect with
me through connect. You can see the QR
code below. Look forward to hearing from
you. Yeah. But what I what I want to
know is you you have a creative mind. So
let's say let's say out of a 100 people
that get in there. Okay.
Uh let's say 50 of them are in there
because they're driven by power, fame,
prestige, you know, narcissist, all that
stuff. Okay? Let's say 20% get in
because they're statesmen. They love
America. They're, you know, they're just
really want to go out there and make a
difference. Let's say 30% get in because
they think it's a good job, right? It's
like, it's a pretty good job. I'm going
to go try it out, see what I can do. I'm
going to go be a lawyer. Okay. The 50%
are the ones that found a place where
they can use their evil tendencies. And
I understand what you're saying. I
understand what you're saying. But once
the 20% gets in, y the 20% are the ones
that are getting in that I'm a
statesman.
I love America. Got it. You know, it's
bigger than this. What do you think
happens for the 20enters to flip? What I
think is you was you say 20% statesmen
get in there or something like that. It
says 20%. I'm just making up a number. I
think that's accurate. I think that's
accurate. I think there are probably 20%
I was probably embellishing. The problem
is is if you're in an institution, you
have leakers or or one or two people at
the top. All it takes is a couple that
are sabotaging your campaign that are
leaking your confidential informance to
the press. It completely sabotages your
operation. So the problem in in these
institutions if you don't have your team
which is like 100% loyal and in and high
integrity even a few of these snakes can
destroy the entity. So that that is that
is the problem in my view is that you
have a couple people at the top who who
are engaged in gaslighting uh
destructive campaigns. Uh maybe Bonino,
here's another thing, like they're
getting fed information that is not true
uh and they're put in a position, an
untenable situation where it's difficult
for them to be successful. That's what I
think. Well, James, here's my question
though. If they're from her words, we
all everybody heard it twice. One to a
stranger, one in front of a camera on
the White House lawn. They have tens of
thousands of hours. That's mindboggling
of grown men having sex with children.
Okay. What? Who has the power, James, to
not let them expose those people right
now? Because those people are still
walking around pedophiles, sexual
assault pedophiles that belong in
prison. And and to me, I I I believe
they deserve to die. Okay, that's my
thing. Who's stopping them, James, from
releasing one of the names? We we know
the whole backstory with Epstein, but
you mean to tell me you guys are
watching these videos every single day
and nobody's been taken off the street?
That's a question that Dan Bino and Cash
Patel need to answer. They need to
answer. Will they do they have the
courage to answer it? Why Why aren't
they answering it? By the way, people
expect me to answer that question. I
don't have any power. I mean, I'm other
than the the the the authority that
sources give to me when they give me
information. I'll tell you something. I
released some videos in the last week
inside of Epstein's bedroom in the
British Virgin, excuse me, the the
American Virgin Islands. I'm releasing
images inside of his temple. Some
interesting stuff on the chalkboard. By
the way, there's a weird picture of a
baby in his in his dining room. Some
weird There's his There's his
chalkboard. The FBI had those videos,
but you know who released it? O'Keefe
Media. Yep. So why why can't they
release the binders at the was remember
the binders they released okay if they
release why can't they release this
stuff why why am I releasing it
I mean there's no sex of children in
there that's something you could show
the public that's Epstein's writing on
the by the way on the chalkboard uh some
mysterious and cryptic messages there I
think our government say power deception
music a mirror in face either dank brain
or dark brain one these are the public
is deciphering these messages that Jeff
Epstein, this is video, by the way, if
you're wondering what this is, this is
days after he was raided, uh, shortly
after his arrest there in 2019, 2020.
And that's the penmanship to show that
it is was in fact Jeff Epstein's writing
on the chalkboard. So, we released this
video and uh, my point is someone inside
the United States government provided
that to me. Wow. Someone inside the
United States government gave that to
you. That's correct. That you're in
communication with. That's correct. High
ranking or mid-level? I can't say. Okay.
But they gave it to you because they
knew that the government wasn't going to
release it. So, let me have it released
by an OMG. They gave it to me because
they don't trust the FBI and they work
for the FBI. I can't say. Okay. And some
of the stuff that I saw, the statues,
the angel statue, right? the girl in the
bathroom sitting there. The uh uh the
That's a strange statue there. It's It
looks It's It's like eyes wide shut like
sort of stuff there with the with the
weird a woman that doing something to
her private parts there. It's freaking
demonic house, bro. There is some book a
book regarding Satan in the bookshelf.
We got some books there. So, yeah, this
was provided to me. This you're you're
looking at the library, the bedroom of
Jeffrey Epstein and the uh little St.
James the Epstein Island. This is inside
of his library. No one's ever seen this
before. Um, some people attacking me for
publishing this. Oh, we want the names,
James. We don't care about his library.
But my Oh, there it is. Satanic Verses
and some other books there. Satanic
Versus by Salman Rush. Salman Rush.
Right. That's that's different. But, um,
people were attacking me because they
want the names. And my philosophy is
that if I continue to publish all these
things, sources will continue to come
out. Okay. So let me let me ask this
question to to go to uh the next
level. Your your method on how you get
it, right? Your method on how you guys
gather intel. It seems to be a pattern
that a lot of these like it's almost
like if I was to audit you to see what
your game plan is.
you you tend to target people that work
in the office that are
gay that let me just say it and then
just flush mine out and call me out and
say I disagree. So through
Grinder dating sites, you'll go in step
number one, let's identify anybody on
this administration that is gay. All
right, great. Step number two, go on
Grinder and see if you see their profile
that matches this. Great. Let's make 20
different profiles and let's see if one
of the ones he'll fall for. Great. Four.
Schedule day to go out and put the
camera and the recording on you and
nonchalant ask what do you do and act
like you don't know what they do and you
don't have a clue who they are and act
dumb. And then step number six, let's
have a couple drinks. Loosen them up.
Make him feel like you're ready to go
home and have some fun with them. Step
number seven, say, "Let's follow up. I
have to go home. I'm so sorry." And then
number eight, release the information.
Is that pretty spot on on the system and
the approach you guys take or am I
missing a few steps? You might you might
be missing a few but I think that's not
100% of what we do. That might be like
30% of of that's one technique to get
information. Yes. Okay. So if that's the
case
I if that's the
case how come have you had any or have
you tried maybe the better question is
to to say I am sure you've tried to get
Fouchy I am sure you've tried to get his
people I am sure you've tried to you
know uh uh uh see how you can find him
to get him in a place to open up and
talk the question would be one have you
two why have you not been that
successful with specifically Anthony
Fouchy. I am specifically talking about
Anthony Fouch. The man, not his staff,
for example. Well, anybody that's a his
lieutenant that would be a staff as
well. That's still a very valuable asset
because what you did with Fizer was very
powerful. Why haven't you gone been
successful with Fouchy? You know, that's
a I don't have a legitimate excuse
there. I I suppose
um I I like to say this to my staff that
and I hate to refer to myself in the
third person, but O'Keeffe O'Keefe
Media, my organization, we always get
the story. Sometimes it just might take
longer for us to get it. So I would say
we haven't gotten him yet. Uh have I
made the attempts? I mean, we did so
many stories about Fizer specifically,
but to your point, why haven't we gone
after this man in particular? Oh, I
remember about two three years ago, I
was I I did some everything I'm talking
about is legal, but I did some a lot of
surveillance on him for a number of days
and moved on to the next story. So, I I
I suppose I don't really have a good
excuse there and and that's something
that I should get him to open up about.
I don't know if I told you last time we
were together, there was a story of an
insurance guy who uh uh had a couple
prostitutes on his payroll and this guy
sells big insurance policies, something
called premium financing. And one day,
one of his competitors steals a give it
away, give it, give or take a $5 million
insurance policy away from him. And he
finds out that he stole that $5 million
insurance policy and coerc the client to
go with him instead of the other guy.
Anyways, this guy, step number one,
someone's computer keeps calling that.
Can you lower the audio? Yeah. So, he
sends first the private investigator to
see patterns for about a month. They
measure his patterns. what restaurants
he goes to at what time, where he sits,
what he orders, who's his waiter, who's
his waitress. A month later, after doing
a private investigation and seeing his
patterns, she sends the girl. The girl
goes sits at the bar, he she knows where
he's going to be at, what time. And
right next to him, she gets emotional
and she smiles at him. He starts talking
and say, "What's going on? Is everything
okay with you? I'm so sorry. I'm just
really going through really hard time."
She starts crying. She opens up to him.
She says, "I'm so embarrassed crying
here." He follows her, goes upstairs to
a room. Boom. They have the recording,
the footage. He sends the footage to the
other agent, says, "Hey, this is what
you did. You need to send that client
back over to me." Do you go as far as
that to measure patterns of an
individual to see what restaurants and
places to go to to be able to track it
or, you know, is that one of the other
extreme example? But we have done things
like that. There is something that we're
working on right now where we were uh uh
tracking down uh corruption in DC uh
which you'll see in a month or so which
is serious serious story and we had to
find a specific individual or a specific
organization. So you can't do a dating
app thing. You got to do it a different
way uh for for you might you might uh uh
pretend to an uh we don't do exactly
what you just said but you might create
an alias. Let's say you're you're a head
hunter or you're a hiring. So you
whatever a person needs, someone needs
something. Undercover work is about
identifying what that need is and
providing that thing to them so that you
can get access to them. Undercover work
is all about access. Uh how do you get
access to someone? The easiest way is is
a dating app because everyone needs love
and affection and so forth and so on. Or
they they they believe the person
they're meeting with could be a possible
future partner. That's the easiest and
most expedient way. But you you make a
really good point about Anthony Fouchy
and and frankly I don't have a good
excuse and I usually don't do this on
live television, but maybe I should send
a team to get him to open up. It's a
good idea. Um I don't think me saying
this will stop him. That's the other
thing. These people are so arrogant that
people often say, "How do these people
keep talking to you like this?" And the
truth is because I'm not a psychologist,
but for lack of a better word, they're
all narcissists. They think they're
untouchable. That's right. And they
don't even look at us. It's almost like
they're confessing. They They just don't
even think. It's impossible for them to
think they could be held accountable for
what they're saying. And we have a whole
bunch of what we call swipers. We call
them the American swipers. And these are
girls, some guys. I do this sometimes,
you know, and I go on these these lunch
meetings, dinner meetings, and they just
spill the beans. a lot of guys in the
deep state in Washington that work for
these organizations, the Pentagon,
Department of Defense, and they're
talking about they're resisting Donald
Trump from the inside. Don't tell
anybody I'm doing this. And they'll
always say it within the first 15
minutes. And some of them have security
clearances.
Yeah, that's the part
where when you're putting a team
together, you you have
to measure their level
of ambition to be
cool, right? To kind of say, "Let me
tell you what I know." Wink wink. Let's
keep it between us. I'm
cool. You know, goes back to Jonah
Mendes, the chief disguise officer I had
on the podcast. I interviewed her right
in front of the White House. And I said,
"What's a good quality of being a CIA
agent?" I said, "Is it charming? Is it
is it great in sales? Is it being great
persuader? Is it being this? Is it being
that?" He says, "It's all of that and
then some." However, there's one quality
we look for. What's that? If you just
got the information that, you know,
you're watching TV, you just saved the
free world, you don't need to brag about
it to anybody else. Wow. That's the
quality of a good CI agent. What a
freaking perspective.
So for me, if you're bringing guys in,
like you almost have to size them up to
see how much are you trying to be cool.
Like for example, Scott Bessant gives me
a lot of good vibes of a guy that could
give a [ __ ] about being cool. Makes
sense because this guy worked under the
roof for 15 years, almost 14 years.
First term was, I think, nine years
under Soros, then five years as his
chief investment officer if I'm not
mistaken. Prior to him going up there,
the average person didn't know who he
was. They kind of knew but they didn't
know who he was. It was like whoa who is
this guy right? And then he goes in but
some of the guys that get in there
they're really really ambitious with
fame and fame tends to get a hold of you
and corrupt you in ways because behind
closed doors you want to be sitting in a
room saying let me tell you what I know.
That's very hard to find people like
that on the inside. very hard to you
know have people around you that no
information on what things you guys are
working on and they want to brag to
nobody when I was running my insurance
company would always have big
announcements like first time I had Kobe
Bryant as a keynote speaker the late
Kobe Bryant I didn't tell anybody at
that event I announced him and George
Bush as keynote speakers until the very
end only two people knew that those two
were the keynote speakers I didn't tell
anybody and when we announced my own
wife didn't
know when we announced everyone's like
What? Yes. But I could only tell two
people. You didn't tell your wife.
Nobody knew because it's exciting news.
It's not even like for some people that
like they want to say it. They can't
control the excitement. Oh my god, I
can't wait to meet him. Oh my god, I
can't wait that he's coming down. Right?
So for some it's from purely from an
innocent excitement standpoint. For some
it's about let me tell you what I know.
Don't tell anybody. Right. Dude, that
filtering process of getting people like
that on your team, that's almost
impossible. That's almost impossible.
But that is the that is the uh that is
the mission of how to surround yourself
with good people. Oo, that's a tough
thing to do. The only way you can do
that is if you've never never had a run
rate with them to accelerate the testing
because you your your character has to
be tested. It takes about a couple
years. How do you do that? I'm just
curious your thoughts on how do you do
that? You you test them. It takes a
couple years. you you test them with
level three information and see if that
gets leaked. It's easy. Go ahead and
leak that. So, I don't want you to leak
it, but if you do, I now know who you
are, right? And then once I do that, I
know I can never have you on level two
type of meetings. I can only have you on
level four type of meetings. I can't
invite you to level two type of meetings
cuz you leak information. So, that
that's the part where little bit here,
oh, you can't know. Little bit there.
Oh, you cannot. Like you have kids, you
know how you're like, let me test to see
if this guy can handle some bad news at
this age. You give it to him, he panics
and has anxiety. Like I can't give you
bad news. But you give this other guy
some bad news about what's going on with
family. He can handle you. Like this
guy's a gamer. He's not there yet.
Because this guy gets distracted. This
guy with bad news, he knows how to keep
it to himself. Stay strong. Okay, good.
I can handle talking highle conversation
with this level of my kid, but not this
one. Like a controlled leak almost. It's
a controlled leak to test what the
individuals know. This is a very
difficult thing to do. and I bet out a
job with Donald Trump when you're at
that
level. Uh, all you can do is James, what
do you think about John? James, what do
you think about Cash? Let's say you
don't have a relationship with him.
Let's say you don't have a relationship
with some of these guys. What do you
think about him? I think he's good. And
then you're hoping the person I'm asking
is a tier one person that can filter out
a person that's a tier four. Do I make
this person a tier two? I don't know if
this is making sense. like you have to
almost
like lean on somebody else you trust to
filter them out.
The reason why I'm going here is to to
see, you know, how how for somebody to
get to the level of the president where
you saw the first term, how many people
he hired that turned on him, flipped on
him. What did his methodology for phase
two in 2024 change? How do you think
about the team that and the people that
he's put together? I think they're a
good team. I think they're loyal. That's
what I I in full disclosure, I I've
hiked with Bobby Kennedy in the Santa
Monica Mountains and I found him to be a
brave man. I say brave, I mean he there
was no incentive for him to do what he
has done. He's a Kennedy. So I I agree
with Tucker that Bobby Kennedy is
probably one of the bravest people to
have done what he has done. But I I
think going back to your point about
incentives in my case, I speak from
personal experience. Let me let me give
you a thought
experiment. Yeah, I've been arrested by
the FBI. I've been raided by the FBI.
I've been sued 50 times. I've been
through all these things. Haven't been
shot yet. And what Trump what Trump has
gone through is at the highest level.
And
um I find that there is an incentive to
betray people like Trump. Think of all
the goodies you get if you go to the New
York Times and there's an incentive
there. And I I find that um when you are
pinched by the FBI, which I have been,
and by the way, totally falsely accused,
that doesn't matter if you did it or
not. You're an innocent man. Forget
that. But when they did this to Michael
Flynn's son or something to the effect
of you better sign this form saying that
your boss committed a crime or you won't
see your family for 10 years. How many
people would take that deal? In other
words, how many people would do the
right thing even if they suffered? Now,
that's a really terrifying and you
hesitate to answer that question because
this is where things get really deep
because when you're going after the most
powerful people in the world, which we
are doing, which Trump is doing,
um, you have to find people, not Pat,
who just won't leak information, but if
the FBI were to point a gun at you and
said, "You better sign a form saying
that James embezzled money." They say,
"I will not do that because I fear God,
not man." Or whatever. If you're a
Christian, you say that. If you're
something else, you say something
similar. I fear God, not man. I will not
bear false
witness because it's the wrong thing to
do. Well, then you're not going to see
your family for 10 years. Okay? You have
to find people like that. That's hard.
It's hard to find those people. I I go
back to my original point. The instinct
for self-preservation is an extremely
important human behavior. And if you're
going to do what Donald Trump is doing
or to a certain extent what Project
Veraritoss was doing, going after
Anthony Fouchy and these types of people
and Fizer and Black Black Rockck and the
FBI, you have to find people who are
completely unbreakable. And that's just
what we're talking about. How do you
find that? Very, very difficult thing,
very difficult thing to do. And Donald
Trump, I'll tell you one quick story
about Donald Trump. I was with him a
year ago in his apartment in um New York
City and this was like right around the
week he was getting indicted for some
stupid stuff with the the the the porn
star and he was signing a hat to my
father and this is I had done a story on
the CIA exposed a CIA guy on tape who
was on one of these dating apps giving
away information. I'm resisting Donald
Trump. I'm not giving information to the
president. And he was and and Trump
wanted to make a video with me about
reacting to this. And I said, 'How do
you deal with it? I said, 'How? I'm
serious. How do you? And he goes, he's
signing this hat to my dad and he goes,
"I just don't care. I just don't care."
I was like, "You don't care." He's like,
"I don't care." Um maybe he doesn't
care, but he has been able to develop a
way perhaps where he just got thick
skin, you know, but it's tough. It's
really tough to to face these attacks.
And I can be strong, right? I cannot
bear false witness, right? Mhm. I can
say I will not talk to you. Screw you.
But my people around me have to be
really really strong. Yeah. It's not
everybody's job. You know, it's not it's
not everybody's job. And when you go up
to that position, you have to also know
that your own family is not going to
understand the job. You're even your
voters are not going to stand understand
the job. There's some decisions you have
to make that's going to make 80% of
people unhappy. And then you're going to
be also in positions where your
character is going to be tested. You're
hoping that part you don't fall for.
Okay. But sometimes you wonder when
these guys get in another reason why
they, you know, flip or change or any of
that. Who's more valuable to a US
government? Somebody that I have
information on that I can control when I
give him the job or somebody I don't
have information on? I don't know if you
understand the question what I'm saying.
Said that again so I understand. Who is
more
controllable? Somebody I hire that I
have information on them, some intel on
them that's maybe sensitive that they
wouldn't want to be public, right? Am I
better off hiring somebody that I have
something like that or am I better off
offering job to somebody that I have no
intel on them? That's an interesting
question. And it depends on your style
of leadership. Interesting in whether
you have something on I mean people
everyone has skeletons in their closet.
Correct. Mhm. Maybe something we've done
that we were not proud of. Would you
agree with that statement? Maybe not
illegal. Uh although maybe you stole
something when you were a teenager, but
isn't it true that we all every single
one of us has something that we're not
No one walks on water. Everyone sins in
it. We s we and I mean I said myself
included. these board members of my
company were trying to leak like
intimate messages between me and my
girlfriend which made them look bad
because everyone has an intimate life uh
consensual life in your in your bad
bedroom. But I I think your point is
interesting. What I would say in
response to that is
that the yeah the the motivation the
incentive for people not to have those
skeletons leaked is extremely high.
People will do anything to avoid being
publicly shamed. And this is where this
blackmail and this extortion thing comes
in. My my philosophy, you want to know
what I said, go ahead, make my day. Leak
it. I don't care. I don't give a [ __ ]
Publish everything. And they did.
Evidently, they don't have much on me
cuz the FBI went through every message
in my phone for 5 years and all they
could get was some kinky messages
between me and my girlfriend. But I do
think that the the what what are your
what is your answer? Which of those do
you think as an employer you'd focus on
between those two? No, to me it it
depends what type of a leader you are.
Depends on what type of leader you are.
It depends on what type of a leader you
are because I've watched how some of our
guys led their guys and some of my
competitors led them. I was in a
previous company and I watched how one
guy let one of his comp guys who he held
him hostage because every month that guy
under the table was giving him cash for
loans and stuff like that, mortgages and
then all of a sudden the day it stopped
that guy lost all his
licenses. So he liked having information
on his guys to hold him hostage. But
deep down inside that relationship is a
dark relationship and you don't have the
loyalty. It's kind of like uh imagine
you know Anna Nicole Smith marries that
billionaire or whoever the guy was 90
some years old and he was 90 88 years
old whatever his age was right she
marries this guy old as hell and you
think all the money in the world is
going to win her love over. No, you just
win her sex over. You don't win her love
over. Right. Whoever this Jay Howard
Marshall was that she ends up with this
guy and next thing you know he dies.
He's well, she's wealthy and then she
dies from overdose, right? You can, you
know, win someone's sex over their body
over love. You can't you can't win love
with money. That takes a lot of work to
get someone's love, right? So I think
the part with Trump which made him one
of a kind is do you realize we now know
about Stormmy Daniels, Karen McDougall,
grab him by this. We know all of that
stuff. And you know what people say? No
one gives a [ __ ] No one cares. No one
gives a [ __ ] Which by the way, if you
remember the moment Herman Kaine 13
years ago, whatever the timeline was,
he's in the bus. He's not coming out
because apparently him and his wife were
fighting in the bus and they found out
while he was the CEO of this pizza
company, he had a lover or he had a what
do you call it? A mistress or something
like that. Because of that, he stepped
out. While Trump would come out and say,
"Listen, it's my personal life. It's
between me and my wife. We're moving on.
What do you want to ask me?" So Trump
was the guy that because he was so
trained in New York to go up against
these gangsters and tough guys and
manipulators and media, he has been
trained to get to this position. That's
not everybody's job. So I think for him,
he got so much moral authority today
that if you cross him, the world is
going to defend him. Not you. Not the
world. I'm not talking mainstream media,
but the people that are his supporters.
So, I don't know if he needs it today. I
don't know if he needs I think an
average
regular president that got up there, the
traditional go be a lawyer and go be
Congress and Senate and [ __ ]
[ __ ] Yeah, that person needs a lot
of that. I think from Trump's
standpoint, Trump is like,
"Look, if you're in, you're in. If
you're not, let's go. If you're going to
roll, you roll. But I don't give a [ __ ]
about what mistakes you made." I mean, I
know what I've done and I'm like, "Let's
go." I think my my concern as an
employer would be I don't know if this
falls into your dichotomy but okay you
have information on people will the
enemy will the person allow the enemy to
use that information as leverage and I'm
the type of person where they may have
something on me I don't care publish it
but do my employees are they able to be
strong enough or will the enemy come and
say we have this information upon you
now betray your mission well by the way
guess you know what that is what that's
a pure your test to find out who was
loyal and who wasn't. So, it's an
awesome situ. It's a tier one test. Tier
one test cuz that's a real test. That's
a real test. Then you're like,
"Oh, so it wasn't was because it's, you
know, you're just benefiting from what
you were getting." I got it. Cool. It's
good to know now. I got it. No problem.
You know, we're good to go. You know
that these moments where you're tempted
to steal money, where you're tempted to
do certain things, where you're tempted
to go through, you know what things?
We're investigating somebody right now.
It's been going on for a few months. The
stuff I found out yesterday of one of
these guys that we've been investigating
has done. You're investigating in your a
former person that used to work with us.
Yeah. Do you know what things we found?
And but by the way, you have to hear
what he used to say. All the lines.
James, you're like a father figure to me
crying while behind closed doors taking
money and taking all this stuff. you the
but these are beautiful situations
because you know what happens when the
investigation's over with? We're going
to publicly report it to everybody here
to our employees. You know why? It's the
same thing we did in the insurance
company. If anybody at all sold
insurance doing forgery, we told
everybody. We told everybody and said
that guy's insurance license is lost for
10 years. He can never do insurance
again. Go ahead and test it and see what
happens to you. If somebody went out
there did any kind of stuff that was
bad, we publicized it so people wouldn't
do it again. Accountability. It's a form
of accountability and it's a form of
awareness. It's like, you know, you ever
seen the the the mom or the dad is
trying to feed the kid and the kid is
not eating and he puts it in the dog the
doll's mouth and then goes to the kid,
goes this way, goes this way and this
guy's down there, bam, hits the face of
the little doll and then goes, put the
food him out. It's a form of don't make
this effing mistake, right? Which is
what our FBI is not doing. Which is what
our FBI is not doing. Yeah. So that's
the part where some people are not happy
with us not seeing the accountability
that we were promised. Correct. But I
would say people are enraged about this.
I would say they are. I would say the
part that they're the they're uh what's
the word? Battling with battling with is
look, there's so many great things that
happened, but I really wanted to know
what's going on over here. So do I
compromise these two things that I
really wanted to know? Because what are
you doing to these kids and innocent
kids? These are someone's daughter.
They're someone's granddaughter. They're
someone's sister. Are we not going to
find this out? Are we just going to go
hush hush to this side? I I to this
group that voted specifically to find
out what's going on with Epstein and the
kids. They're not the type that going to
forget about it. Nope. They're they're
the type that's going to keep bringing
it up until you either reveal or you
have to deal with it. We're going to
keep We're five years in. People are
still enraged. Yeah. I don't think
that's going to change.
Um any any other items right now that is
going on where for you politically with
what's going on with White House right
now or politically for you you're a
little bit confused with well um with
with the Tell me what you mean by that
the White House some of the decisions
you know there's a lot of good there's a
lot of victories right now you're seeing
a lot of victories you're seeing the big
big beautiful bill you're seeing you
know Russia Putin Trump talking you're
seeing China you're seeing tariffs
before we move on from from the Epstein
thing real quick if we could go to this.
This is present day. This is the John
Dailyaly uh uh clip with Prince Andrew,
the guy on undercover camera. Didn't you
cover this on your show? Yeah, we did.
Oh, you did? Oh, okay. You guys covered
this. Yeah. This is This is the uh him
basically saying he was he didn't like
the fact that Prince Andrew, the brother
of the late uh I mean of not the late of
the king, was having sex with underage
girls and he didn't like it. Yeah. This
is this is someone who's quite, you
know, loyal and a confidant to Prince
Andrew. I got a lot of heat for this,
too, because people say this doesn't
this doesn't prove anything. And I I
think one of the challenges here is that
you're confirming suspicions. You're
you're getting them on video admitting
it. He's having sex with underage girls.
Then and then this guy goes on Piers
Morgan. I don't know if your I just
think it's hilarious. I don't if your
producer could find that clip, but and
then he says, "I think O'Keeffe's great.
this girl that he said, "Man, she was
beautiful." No shame. And what did you
think about what you said? I I regret
saying it. I regret being just He admits
he admits that he was giving you credit
for the girl. And credit to Piers Morgan
for grilling him. I mean, grilling him.
I was actually shocked that that uh it's
might be hard to find this clip, but
Piers Morgan was just grilling him. So
that's that's um I I've been I've been I
honest to Pat I've been so heads down in
my reporting. I mean heads down on on
this Epstein reporting I have not you
know I have not followed everything on
the news right now in the world. So let
me ask make the second request. So my
first request was Fouchi. My second
request is
Diddy. Have you at all thought about
doing anything with Diddy or you guys
haven't focused on that one yet? I think
these are great ideas. No, no, I think I
think there's there's I I I am and I
should and I will and I did get some
sources with Diddy a year or two ago,
but I think your idea Let me ask you a
better question. What is the thing that
needs to be exposed? What if
exposed would change things? That's
helpful to me. Yeah. I mean, if you
think about, okay, so if you want to be
part of something legendary, I'm talking
legendary is in the 70s, '60s, ' 50s,
40s, 30s, Jay at Ghouver, all these guys
when the FBI first started with him,
there is no such thing as a, you know,
Italian, the the crime family that
doesn't exist, right? Organized crime
family doesn't exist. All right. Now
they know he had they had intel on him
with the crossdressing stuff but in the
80s Giuliani was able to bring down the
mob with the help of the RICO law by
this professor from Rutgers that all of
a sudden we saw couple hundred mob
bosses under bosses consiliary
handcuffed walking out getting arrested.
That was unfreakingbelievable.
Right. It was something that everybody
around the world heard about the news.
Okay. Them being perp walked. Of course,
if you James, if you want something that
is revolutionary, a
breakthrough, revolutionary
breakthrough, it's Diddy because he's
alive. The people are alive. With
Epstein, you know, Epstein is is Yeah.
But if you get something from Leon
Black, Rob, is Leon Black still alive? I
believe so. If you go get something from
Leon Black, which I don't know if you
pursued or not. Yes. 73 years old. Okay.
Leon Black is the one that apparently
paid Epste $150 million in consulting
fees. Still alive for tax purposes. Rod,
can you can you type in tax purposes or
tax uh Epstein? Just type tax Epstein.
So right there, Leon Black gave $170
million to Epstein for uh uh uh click on
a rep so we can read the story. So Leon
Black, according to US Senate Finance,
he transfers $170 million to Epstein's
accounts. And when they ask him why you
did that, he said he paid the accused
sex trafficker for tax
advice. This is the most expensive tax
advice anyone's ever given in the
history of mankind. Leon Black, the
billionaire finance and former CEO of
Apollo Global Management transferred
$170 million to the Epson covers for the
course of five years. US Senator Ron
Widen said in a letter that US justice
and Treasury Department this week, not
$158 million as previously reported and
investigation commissioned by Apollo's
board appear to have missed $12 million
in transfer which were discovered by
investigators working with the US. So
Leon Black, some of these guys are
around. Okay, some of them are around on
what Epstein did. But with Diddy, you're
talking about Epstein. You're talking
about Diddy, Hollywood,
sports, you're talking about, you know,
producers, talent agencies,
producers,
countries. I mean, Diddy's
is and it's going on right now. So if
you did something while the hearing is
going on, it's like you finding out
something while OJ Simpson's thing's
going on, right? And you leak leak
something during the entire
investigation. It's like you doing
something and you drop it during Johnny
Depp and Amber Herd, you know, but Diddy
to me is the comparable of an OJ
Simpson. And what do you think the thing
if caught on video that would change
thing? I can't I mean I I'd love to see
people perp walk. I don't have the power
to arrest, but what is the thing that
needs to be on video in your mind? in
your Oh, it's very easy for me. Tell me.
It's very easy. It's a gay sex with, you
know, men that, you know, play straight.
I see. And that is released. In other
words, these men have internal conflicts
and they're blackmailed over this. Oh,
and I think those video footages,
believe it or not, I believe exist in
different people's phones because I
think these guys are
so diddy thought he was so untouchable
that no one was ever going to lose and
they would airdrop a video to each other
like iPhone iOS just I I am willing to
bet that in some kind of a folder it's
sitting there with these footages, you
know, that people save that's got a
specific code that the video is all the
way in and say, "Watch what I have with
what we did here and here and there." I
think that too and also the the
so-called blackmail. How do you how do
you think it it it it actually works?
Like what is the conversation like
in your mind in your imagination? I'm
just curious you guys because that helps
me as an investigative understand what
I'm trying to to catch. How do I think
Diddy's model works? Correct. What's
your hypothesis?
I mean it's it's very simple. You come
to the house, you party, you have one of
the girls that locks on to one of the
guys who's one of your workers. They go
upstairs, there's 17 cameras in there.
He says, "Hey, man. Can I get a room?"
"Yeah, bro. Just go use my room." Goes
to the room, leaves, she's 17, she's 15.
Or there's a guy in there and I record
it. I have it. And the next I say, "Hey,
I just want to let you know here's what
I
got." It's very simple. Moving forward,
anything I ask from you, I need you to
do. That's the thing that needs to be on
video. Yes. You what you just said.
Yeah. That would change everything in my
opinion. I think that would be in text,
not in video. You know, in a text
message. I think it would be in text
messages, but I think that video,
well, he's dumb enough to say it. He's
dumb enough to say stuff like that. He's
capable of saying stuff like that, but
you might have hearsay. In other words,
and this is what happened with Prince
Andrew. Another guy close to him said
that this is what happened.
Which is still powerful. Well, those
guys are out there. The gene deals, the
security, those guys have come out.
They've done their part. There's a lot
of people that have said stuff like
that, like Suge Knight talking about his
link to Clive Davis and all this other
stuff. That stuff is coming out, but if
you can get
him tied to a few other people, I think
this will be the biggest story you'll
break. I I'm working on this and I will
work on this. Okay. Especially with some
of the stuff that was dropped this week,
some of the ecstasy pills and with
Obama's face on Yeah. Some some this
some very very weird stuff going on
here, James. Oh, and there's a I mean,
just just with Obama and Yeah. Obama cuz
he was hung out with him a lot. He was
at the Barack the Vote thing at his
house hanging out, partying, and then
you have videos of like Christy Teen
with John Legend and and they asked
Christy Tegan, "Where's the craziest
place you've had sex in public?" And she
goes, "Um, there was that Obama thing
and John Legend's face looks like he saw
a ghost. He looks like he saw a freaking
ghost." Did you see that, Pat? Yeah, of
course. Okay. Of course, Robbie. Yeah, I
sent it to you in the Slack. But, um, I
I just think, you know, the the the part
with what world we're living in today.
We're living in a world today
where we we're not sure the US
government is going to is going to drop
these stories because these are stories
you can use to get intel.
I mean this is I I I commit to you that
I will do this and I usually do get the
stories. Sometimes it takes me a little
longer than I'd like. But this is also
very dangerous. Wouldn't you admit to do
these stories? Well, you you subscribed
to this lifestyle. I I certainly did. I
remember you said about a year ago you
said James O'Keefe has chosen a tough
life and it was a very I think it was a
more pro profound statement than even
you intended not tough in the way that
most people usually they use the courts
against me legal lawyers that's a whole
other conversation but this is very
dangerous and um the people that have
come before me like the uh what's the
movie to kill a to kill a messenger with
um about a a reporter in California who
reported on the CIA A and the drug drugs
and the CIA and they were given and he
committed suicide. I think he shot
himself in the head twice by the way. Oh
yeah. This this guy who was based upon
um Gary Webb to kill a messenger. And
there's a this are the reporters that
came before me. Gary Webb managed to
shoot himself in the head twice. That's
a really impressive thing to do. Holy
moly. You'd think the gun would fall out
of your hand the first time. You would
think. Um, yeah, he did some stories on
on uh on the CIA. It was a great movie
and Gary Webb has an remarkable quote,
an incredible quote that I would like to
read on the air in front of all of you.
And it's from this book that was written
called To Kill a Messenger. And I'm
going to paraphrase because I can't pull
it up, but it's um Gary Webb says um you
know, I was winning I'm going to
paraphrase it. I was winning awards. I
was getting accolades. I was giving
speeches. I won the Pulit surprise. And
then I broke some stories. He's talking
about the one about the CIA that made me
realize how misplaced my bliss had been.
I I I started messing with with the
wrong people. And and I and I and I
began to realize I had mis I misplaced
my value and what I actually valued. I'm
I'm butchering the quote, but it's a
profound quote. and then he committed
suicide. So my point to you is that this
is very dangerous, man. No, the job
you've chosen, it's tough because if you
Okay, here's the next part. If you have
a lot of friends in high places, James,
you're not doing your job right. That's
correct. But you need Do you know what
everyone says in the conservative
movement? Do you know Cash? Do you know
Pam? Do you know this guy? It's all
about rubbing elbows and people doing
favors. I don't do that for a living.
No, that's that's not u that's not the
the the profile of this job. No, the
profile of this job is exactly what
you're doing and it's not for everybody.
It's just not for everybody because
you're not a popular cool
person. You're you for you to keep the
T-word for as long as possible, you
can't have a lot of friends. And you
know what the T word is? The trust.
Trust. Yeah. To keep trust, you can't
have a lot of friends at high places. At
high places. That's right. It's a tough
thing as a journalist to navigate the
relationship between what I call
autonomy and access. There's a tension
in journalism because on one hand, you
have to protect your sources and on the
other hand, you have to investigate. And
it's very difficult. That's a very it's
an art form. Yeah. It's an ethical line.
At what point do I I'm going to burn
this. In business, you call it burning
bridges. In journalism, you burn bridges
every day. You you report on powerful
people. So, it's very tough. Well, Jake
Tapper, look at what happened with Jake
Tapper, right? Like with all the stuff
that he's going through right now. Okay.
Why is he losing respect from other
journalists because we all knew what
he's now reporting like he's acting like
it's news? He's acting like it's news.
James, question before we finish it up
here because we got a few minutes here
left. Yes. So uh uh uh in your opinion,
you spent a lot of time with Breitbart.
What happened to him? You mean like how
did he die? Yeah. What happened to him?
The timing of it is very strange.
I don't I don't have any inside
information. I know I know his wife
would always say to me, "Don't tell
people that he was killed." Andrew had a
heart condition. He had an enlarged
heart, I believe. And the doctor said,
"You got to, you know, you got to stop,
you know, you know, eating all this
steak and drinking all this wine. You
have to stop traveling." And I think he
just truly pushed himself. That's my
belief. I don't have I would share with
the audience if I had any evidence of
foul play. All I have is circumstantial
evidence. I have no direct evidence. He
dropped out of a heart attack at 43.
This was March 1st, 2012. I was 27. He
was my mentor. Did you ever meet him?
Never. Andrew was a remarkable man. He
he edited the Drudge Report at the time.
He would tweet like a thousand times a
day. He was filled with righteous
indignation. This is a different world
12 years ago. The media was different.
You could like engage with Legacy Media.
You could tweet back and forth. You
could have conversations and and he was
a mentor of mine. He was we were very
different people. He was more of an
extrovert. I was at the time much more
introverted. Um but but he had a way
about him. He was a warrior and that's
what we shared in common. I I think what
I would characterize myself, I'm a
journalist. I'm also a warrior. I'm at
war all the time, constantly. And he was
too. But it aged him. Like I'm now 40
years old. He died at 43. And he in the
last few years of his life, he just
seemed to age. And he and he took things
personally. and he was, you know, angry
and furious and righteous and indignant
and tweeting every tweet at the reporter
and holding them accountable. It was it
was I've never met anyone like him. I
still haven't met anyone like him, but I
don't unfort I don't have any, you know,
information about his death other than I
know he had a heart condition.
That's all I can say. And and it was
kind of I mean the uh and God rest us
all because I mean I was a huge fan and
that James that's how I found out about
you. It was just weird that he was on
stage claiming that he had tapes on
Obama. He would call him a radical. I
remember uh another time camera in his
face uh some reporters holding he's
yelling at the guy's recorder and he's
saying we we're coming after you John
Podesta. We're coming after you big
Soros. There's this moment there's this
moment um where Andrew Breitbart is
talking to Dave Wigel. I I know this
well and and this is really this is this
is a perfect perfect story. Yeah. And
the reporter reporter's got his little
pencil and paper. Yeah, I don't know if
they do that anymore, but pencil writing
down and Andrew goes and Andrew is
talking to the reporter and he and he
screams into the reporter notebook,
"Fuck you, John Podesta." Like
he's only Andrew Breitbart. He's talking
to the reporter notebook, not to the
guy, but to the masses the reporter is
writing to. That is a quintessential
Andrew Breitbart moment. And I
understand him because I'm I am similar
in that particular way. He was
righteously indignant taking on this
mainstream media. That's it. Watch this.
Yeah, watch this. Concerted effort
politics of personal destruction. [ __ ]
you, John Podesta.
Watch big soros. Look. Watch this. Watch
this. Yeah. When I when I talk, that's
because I'm interested in whatever the
hell they're doing. What's in your
closet, John Podesta? He's talking to
the reporter notebook. Big Podesta. Big
Soros. Do you want us to play these
games? because we're playing to win.
This is Andrew Breitbart, dude. And then
and then think about it. Uh James, he
has this attitude. I love the righteous
indignation. I read the book. The guy's
like you said, he was going 100 miles an
hour because he's just he has the same
You guys weren't the same, James, but
you the the message and and getting the
truth out there. No, we spoke. I mean,
Andrew, we him and I this man you just
saw him and I spoke 10 times a day. I
mean, he was constantly talking to me
and and then he died and I was alone. I
I found the quote. I need to read this
on the air. Please. quote, "This is the
the the CI the investigative reporter
who exposed drug trafficking when the
CIA and getting drugs in America, Gary
Webb." I was winning awards, getting
raises, lecturing college classes,
appearing on TV shows, and judging
journalism contests. I won the Puliter
Prize. And then I wrote some stories
that made me realize how sadly misplaced
my bliss had been. The reason I'd
enjoyed such smooth sailing in my career
for so long hadn't been, as I'd assumed,
because I was careful and diligent and
good at my job. The truth was that in
all those years, I hadn't written
anything important enough to suppress.
Wow. Gary Webb to kill a messenger shot
himself in the head twice. everything
everyone that has come before me and who
extreme truth tellers have been like you
think look at even historically like on
a much larger scale they've been
assassinated JFK that's why that's why
the Bribard story is different if you
and I understand your respect for the
wife and and I'm sure she's sick and
tired of hearing all this stuff because
she just wants to move on so you can
take that position but Rob if you can
pull that thing up it's a little weird
when you read about it and you see stuff
about
um you know Let me see this. So, this is
the corner, right Pat? Yeah. So, you got
Michael Cormier, a forensic technician
with LA County Office, died on April
20th, 2012, the same day Breard autopsy
results were released. Cormier was compl
had complained of severe stomach pain
and vomiting before being hospitalized
where he later died. Initial reports
indicate that uh arsenic poisoning was a
possible cause of death and LA
department did not immediately rule out
foul play. What are the odds? Little
weird. What are the odds that the day
that that's a little suspicious? that
little the proximity of Cormier's dead
to the release of Bribart's autopsy
report led to online speculation about a
possible connection between the two
deaths. Uh uh however official clarified
that Cormier was not involved in
Bribart's autopsy. Deputy Sheriff Cor
Edin understand that Cormier had nothing
to do with the autopsy or the
investigation. As of now, no def
definitive public finding has been
released regarding the cause of
Cormier's death and no official
connection has been established between
his death and that of Andrew Brybart.
What if you had to say the odds, Pat?
What are the odds that because some
people were saying that he ran out,
Andrew ran out and turned a completely
different color as if he was choking on
something that when the autopsy of him
comes out, a guy in that same uh LA
coroner's office dies of arsenic
poisoning. He didn't get hit by a car.
He didn't fall off of a bridge. He's
died. Somebody poisoned him. Yeah.
problem and I this is Pat this is
extremely suspicious and um God willing
the if if anyone has proof if there's
someone in the hospital if there's
someone with knowledge of this I'd love
to report the problem is I I walk a fine
line too because if I come out and make
a statement that I can't prove then I
lose credibility so I have to be careful
but I hear what you're saying this is
incredibly suspicious um and I I don't I
don't even know what to say about it
except I hope that it's 13 years later
here so yeah exactly we're still talking
about JFK and who shot JFK. Yeah. But
the but the point but the the point here
is the reason why I've never talked
about Bribarts and how he I've never
ever talked about it on any podcast
ever. This the first time. I don't know
how many hundreds of interviews we've
done. We've never brought it up. The
only reason we bring it up is because to
me he was a true believer. I think
you're a true believer. And I think
there's a handful of guys that are true
believers. Not mainstream cuz you can't
be mainstream. You have to compromise to
be mainstream. Correct. And you know,
for you to go work for any of the big
platforms, pick any one of them, you
would have to compromise. And I don't
think you're going to be doing that. So
for guys like that, you need additional
protection to be aware. You know, it's
like the other day uh uh Trump was in
Saudi and they offer him a drink and he
just keeps holding it like this. I don't
know if you saw that. He's just keeping
holding a drink like this. He's going to
hold a drink like that. Hold drink like
this. So, I think for a guy like you as
you're going through everything that
you're doing with your circle, with your
community, with people that maybe, you
know, uh Yeah. Is this the one? Look at
this one here. It's classic. What are
you going to do with this? He's not
drinking a dick. So, NBS drank it, but
he's not drinking it. He's just hanging
on to it. It's like, oh, it's great.
It's awesome. Looked down at it. Yeah.
Just give him the respect, but he's not
going to drink it. And and one more
reporter, Michael Hastings, died in a
fiery car crash. He reported on Stanley
Mcrist. So, I'm well aware of the
dangers, but you know, I people I I
mean, what do you really want to know?
Am I afraid to die? Um, not really. I've
lived a good life. I believe in what I'm
doing. And I there I'm also a spiritual
person. I I believe in God. I, you know,
there's that saying, you know, no weapon
formed against me shall prosper. It's in
Isaiah. I I genuinely believe I I wear
it around my neck. Border Patrol agent
gave to me. I rode the train of death in
Mexico. I should have died. I didn't,
you know. So, I I believe in what I'm
doing and and and
um maybe I'll be the one that got away.
That's all I can say. Great. And gang,
uh as you're watching this, do yourself
a favor and go watch the podcast. We're
going to put the link below, Rob. Let's
make sure we do that. Not the podcast,
the documentary, the movie that just
came out. Uh uh uh the truth inside
Veraritoss part one. It's 54 minutes.
It's going to feel like five minutes to
you because that's exactly how I felt
when I watch it. Went like this. Boom.
And I'm like, "Wow, intense." The energy
is going to be high from the beginning
to the very end. I really enjoyed
watching it. James, great having you
back on. Appreciate you for coming down.
Thank you. Anytime. Take care everybody.
Bye-bye. Bye-bye. Hello everyone. I'm
James O'Keefe. Been doing this
journalism thing for about 20 years.
Truth, justice, exposing corruption,
everything that comes along with it. If
you want to connect with me, talk to me
about any of this, you can connect with
me through connect. You can see the QR
code below. Look forward to hearing from
you.