Video summary
Dr. Mark Hyman, a medical doctor and leader in functional medicine at Cleveland Clinic Center for Functional Medicine, defines his approach not merely as treating disease but as creating health by optimizing fundamental body systems like the gut, immune system, mitochondria, detox pathways, and hormonal regulation. His philosophy stems from personal experience; after becoming severely ill with chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive decline, and autoimmune issues in his mid-30s due to environmental toxins like mercury exposure while working abroad, he realized that traditional reductionist medicine failed him because it treated symptoms rather than the interconnected network of biological systems. Hyman describes functional medicine as an "operating system" for biology where one must reverse-engineer health by understanding how these networks interact, noting that conditions once dismissed as psychosomatic or pseudoscience—such as chronic fatigue syndrome and leaky gut—are now recognized with dedicated research sectors in major medical centers. A central pillar of Hyman's argument is the critical role of inflammation as a root cause for nearly all modern chronic diseases, including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, dementia, autism, depression, and various autoimmune disorders. He illustrates this through a case study of a patient suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, migraines, pre-diabetes, and severe gut issues; by addressing the underlying inflammation via an elimination diet rich in whole foods and removing inflammatory triggers like dairy, gluten, grains, sugar, and processed items, she was able to resolve her symptoms entirely without medication. Hyman emphasizes that modern food systems have "hijacked" American kitchens through convenience culture, leading generations who lack basic cooking skills or knowledge of where their vegetables come from, thereby disenfranchising individuals from owning their biology and necessitating a cultural shift toward nutrition security rather than just calorie-based food security. The conversation also addresses the political polarization surrounding health initiatives like Make America Healthy Again (MAHA), with Hyman expressing frustration that science is being reduced to partisan labels or "biohacking jock" stereotypes, which hinders bipartisan collaboration needed to solve a national crisis where 93% of Americans have some metabolic dysfunction. He highlights significant regulatory differences between the U.S. and Europe regarding food safety; while Europe operates on a precautionary principle requiring proof of safety before adding chemicals like glyphosate or high-fructose corn syrup to the supply, the FDA in America often approves additives based solely on company claims without independent data verification. Hyman points out that this "innocent until proven guilty" approach for drugs does not apply to food ingredients, citing historical examples where dangerous products like partially hydrogenated oils (trans fats) remained legal for decades despite known risks because they were never required to prove harm before market entry. Regarding advanced interventions and longevity, Hyman discusses the use of NAD+ precursors like NMN and exosomes as tools to activate the body's innate repair mechanisms rather than cures that work in isolation. He explains that NAD supports mitochondrial biogenesis, DNA repair via sirtuins, insulin sensitivity, and autophagy, while noting his personal observation of rapid hair growth when taking high doses of sublingual NMN. Exosomes are described as packets of healing information released by stem cells containing growth factors and anti-inflammatory agents that can be administered intravenously to treat conditions like severe depression or joint injuries, though he notes regulatory hurdles in the U.S. compared to other countries where such treatments may be more accessible. Ultimately, Hyman concludes that effective treatment for complex issues like Alzheimer's requires a multimodal approach addressing multiple root causes—such as insulin resistance (Type 3 diabetes), mold exposure, heavy metals, Lyme disease, and methylation deficiencies—simultaneously rather than focusing on single variables in isolation, urging listeners to view their bodies as integrated systems where fixing one hole in the roof is insufficient if twenty-five others remain open.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to the Huberman Lab podcast,
where we discuss science and
science-based tools for everyday
[Music]
life. I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a
professor of neurobiology and
opthalmology at Stanford School of
Medicine. My guest today is Dr. Mark
Heyman. Dr. Mark Heyman is a medical
doctor and an internationally recognized
leader in the field of functional
medicine. He is a practicing physician
and the head of strategy and innovation
at the Cleveland Clinic Center for
Functional Medicine. Today we discuss
what is functional medicine, how the
different systems of the body interact
to improve or degrade our health, the
science of mitochondria and metabolic
health, nutrition, inflammation, and how
you can leverage these factors to
improve your physical and mental health
and cognitive performance at any age. We
also talk about how to confront any
health challenges you might face by
taking a systems level approach. Dr.
Heyman's work is unique in that it
integrates conventional medicine because
after all he is an MD with what he calls
good medicine which is an amalgamation
of the best practices from both
traditional and alternative approaches.
During today's discussion you'll see
that Dr. Heyman's expertise on a diverse
range of topics really comes through.
For instance, we talk about food both
sourcing micronutrients macronutrients
timing. We talk about exercise and we
talk a lot about supplementation and
which supplements can provide tremendous
benefit for certain people in
particular. Dr. Heyman grounds all that
knowledge in the latest discoveries in
human biology to provide you with
actionable tools that you can apply in
any case and at any age. By the end of
today's episode, I'm certain that
everybody will glean at least one and
very likely several important protocol
updates that they can incorporate to
improve their general health. And now
for my discussion with Dr. Mark Heyman.
Dr. Mark Heyman, welcome. Thanks,
Andrew. So good to be here. Great to see
you. We go back a few years. Yeah. Like
almost 10. Yeah. It's been awesome to
see your arc and you were at it long
before I met you. I think to kick things
off probably best if you explain to
people what functional medicine is and
what your orientation towards health and
medicine is because I think there are a
few misconceptions out there both about
functional health and you but I think
also you provide a very unique
perspective you've been at this vista
that no one else has had where you know
people who are deans of medical schools
you know people who are biohackers you
know the general public you've treated
and treat patients And you also are an
experimentalist with
yourself and can make suggestions about
things that can help people. So yeah,
tell us how you parachuted into this
whole thing and how you look at this
whole thing that we call health and
medicine. Yeah, thank you Andrew. And
it, you know, I I would say that, you
know, I didn't choose what I'm doing. It
chose me. Uh I was super healthy, fit,
you know, riding my bike 100 miles a
day. I was 36 years old and then wham I
got really sick and I went from being
able to memorize 30 patients in a day
and dictate their notes and ride my bike
a 100 miles to not knowing where I was
at the end of a sentence and not being
able to barely walk up the stairs and I
got hit with chronic fatigue syndrome
and I tried to figure out what it was. I
went to, you know, doctors at Harvard
and Colombia here, they're everywhere
and oh, you're depressed, take some
Prozac, this and that. And I realized
that I I, you know, traditional medicine
wasn't having the answers. And
even though I sort of came from the
perspective of like a yoga teacher
before I was a doctor, you know, I
studied Buddhism. Yeah. Yoga teacher. I
was It was back in the 80s. You're a
tall guy, long mat. It was They didn't
have yoga mats when I was doing yoga.
You put a towel on the ground. There was
no Lululemon. It was it was like on top
of like the East West bookstore in New
York City, there was like one yoga class
in the early 80s. Okay, that was it. Uh
and I studied Buddhism in college, but I
also studied systems thinking and
systems theory and Gregory Bateson and
you know the nature of the network
effect of life and biology and
everything else. And so I kind of went
through medical school, but when I came
out I was pretty straight traditional
medicine doctor. But then I got sick and
it turned out I had gone to China to
live there for a year and work as a
doctor to help start expatriate medical
clinics because there were no western
medical clinics in China and people were
terrified who were 60,000 expatriots to
go to the Chinese hospital. So I spoke
Chinese because I studied Asian studies.
I went there. But what I inadvertently
had happened was I got exposed to huge
amounts of mercury from the air because
they burned coal and coal expels lead
and mercury and lots of other toxins and
they there's 10 million people in
Beijing in the city at the time and they
all heated their homes with raw coal and
I had an air filter that I would clean
out every day and the breathe the black
soot in. I got like a whopping dose of
mercury and it took a couple years for
it to kind of cause this problem. But
from one day the next I went from being
great to not being great and my gut
broke down. I had diarrhea for years. My
cognitive function completely went
south. It was like I had dementia, ADD
and depression all at once. I ended up
having autoimmune stuff going on and
just rashes and sores and I couldn't
think. I literally almost had to go in
disability.
And I met a person who introduced me to
this guy Jeff Bland who studied with
Lionus Pauling and had a very different
view of health that really was more
around the framework of the body as a
network as a system as an ecosystem
where everything is connected and that
it wasn't reductionist. It was
inclusive. And when when we go to
medical school, we we're taught to ask
for the symptoms, look for the signs, do
the lab testing, and come up with a
singular diagnosis to explain
everything. And you know it if there's
extraneous symptoms that don't fit the
thing we're looking for then we dismiss
it. You know if you go to the the the
the doctors for migraines and you say
well I got irritable bowel. Oh go see
the GI doctor or I have this rash. You
go oh see the dermatologist. But the
truth is the body's connected and
everything is connected. And so
functional medicine is really about
understanding the body as a network as a
system and it's a it's a meta framework
for understanding biology like a it's I
think of it as an operating system. Uh
it's not based on just diagnostic
testing or supplements which a lot of
people think it is. It's really based on
understanding the network of bi. So we
were doing microbiome testing. We didn't
call it that. It was just poop testing
back then. You know, we were we were
looking at hormones, at mitochondria, at
inflammation, at insulin resistance, at
all the things that are toxic
environmental toxins and their role in
health. And we're trying to understand
how the body started to sort of work.
And through that process, I literally
had to reverse engineer my way back to
health by understanding all the systems.
So, my adrenals shut down, my thyroid
wasn't working, my mitochondria were
terrible, my muscle enzymes were super
high, like CPK were super high because I
had a mitochondrial injury, which is the
little, you know, factories in your
cells that make energy. I had severe
cognitive issues and neurotransmitter
issues and sleep issues. I mean uh
immune issues, rashes. So my whole
system broke down. So I literally had to
learn every system of the body and how
it worked and how it connected to every
other system and then create uh a
healing plan for myself and that allowed
me to recover. So that really taught me
to there's this new way of thinking. And
I remember when I I was working at Kenya
Ranch as a as a medical director and I
would see all these patients coming in
and I I started think well you know I'm
going to try to do this on my patients
and see what happens and just apply
these
principles and I call them the laws of
biology right we don't have laws laws of
biology that we can easily describe or
laws of medicine we have laws of physics
but that doesn't mean there aren't laws
of biology and what functional medicine
I believe is is the first clinical
application of this understanding of the
laws of biology and there's like
scientists like Lero Hood who created
the institute for system biology and
folks like at Harvard Lazium Barbasi was
studying this and wrote a book called
network medicine about the body as a
network but for me I had to start to you
know apply this in clinic and so I would
people would come in with autoimmune
diseases or with intractable depression
or with terrible gut issues or dementia
or autism or you name it diabetes and I
would apply these principles
and they get better and like literally I
would say eat this way, don't eat that.
You know, simple stuff like it was not,
you know, that complicated. And six
weeks later, I'd say they follow visit.
I'd say, "Oh, so how you doing?" "Oh,
all my symptoms are better." I'm like,
"What? Really? Your migraines are gone?"
Like I couldn't believe it. Like it was
such a shock to me as a traditionally
trained physician that people were
actually getting better. And so then I
knew I knew this was something real.
Even though it was sort of 30 years ago
was just sort of not even on the radar,
still is pretty pretty much not on the
radar. Although like New York Times is
doing articles about it now, things are
changing, things are changing slowly,
but they're but they're changing, I
think, which sort of um dovetales with
the question I was going to ask, which
is um how did the medical establishment
view this stuff, you know, these days
it's so complicated without, you know,
um taking off on a tangent here, you
know, the word expert is gated
politically. Like one side feels like
they you can only be called expert if
you're with their camp. the other side
is now associated with kind of more of a
um like a like a wellness aspect and you
know and I don't even have to say which
side I'm referring to here and it's it's
become a real clash of you know we only
believe in randomized control trials or
um you know there's clearly evidence
that you know nutrition matters and it's
like of course both things are important
and so what you're describing here is
that you this intersection this
intersection and there really isn't a
political home for the intersection
unfortunately
Maybe in these um new uh in this new I
didn't know cells had a political
ideology.
That's right. That's right. Um no,
that's that's right. I got the red cell
and the blue cell. Exactly. And and
that's what I love about you is that you
you are you you have friends in both
camps and and you're willing to trudge
forward. What what did the medical
establishment think? Yeah. And
um and how many of you are there now?
Yeah, it's a great question. I mean, I
remember talking about leaky gut almost
30 years ago and talking to allergists
and immunologists. People thought you
were crazy and people thought I was a
looney tune. Same thing with chronic
fatigue. By the way, I remember when
chronic fatigue syndrome was considered
a psychosmatic. It's just it's, you
know, people are crazy if they think
they have this. And um we now know uh
like fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, and
leaky gut. This all used to be for those
that are listening that a little bit
younger uh than Mark and I that um that
was considered pseudocience. Just the
whole notion there are now departments
at major university medical centers
devoted to each one of these. That's
right. Maybe not whole departments but
but sectors within departments. Yeah. I
think it's it's crazy how things have
changed. And so now you know we have
people who are talking about
mitochondria in medicine like people
like Christopher Palmer who's a Harvard
professor psychiatrist who's studying
psychiatric disease and the application
of diet nutrition to treat bipolar
disorder and schizophrenia or I will say
Stanford sorry to cut you off now has a
division within our department of
psychiatry on metabolic psychiatry in
large part thanks to Chris's work. Yeah.
Yeah. And yeah so so metabolic
psychiatry about you know role of sort
of insulin resistance and inflammation
in the brain as causing depression and
causing anxiety
and more severe things like bipolar
disease since born and schizophrenia and
these are the things that I saw like in
my patients so I wasn't an academic but
I I would just look at their story and
listen to it and I would look at the
underlying biology because you know you
you talk about the sort of intersection
of the sort of the biohacking kind of
wellness and medical community. Lee Hood
has a term for this. He calls it
scientific wellness. And when people ask
me what functional medicine is, I say
it's the science of creating health as
opposed to the science of treating
disease. When you create health, disease
goes away as a side effect. So if you
optimize your basic body systems, your
gut, your immune system, your
mitochondria, your detox system, your
hormonal regulatory system, when you
optimize those things, symptoms go away.
And you don't have to treat all the
different branches of the trees and the
leaves on the trees. You treat the root
and the trunk, which is what functional
medicine does. I'd like to take a quick
break and thank our sponsor, JWVE. JWV
makes medical grade red light therapy
devices. Now, if there's one thing that
I have consistently emphasized on this
podcast, it is the incredible impact
that light can have on our biology. Now,
in addition to sunlight, red light and
near infrared light sources have been
shown to have positive effects on
improving numerous aspects of cellar and
organ health, including faster muscle
recovery, improved skin health and wound
healing, improvements in acne, reduced
pain and inflammation, even
mitochondrial function, and improving
vision itself. What sets tube lights
apart and why they're my preferred red
light therapy device is that they use
clinically proven wavelengths, meaning
specific wavelengths of red light and
near infrared light in combination to
trigger the optimal cellar adaptations.
Personally, I use the JWV whole body
panel about three to four times a week
and I use the JWV handheld light both at
home and when I travel. If you'd like to
try JWV, you can go to JV spelled
jovv.com/huberman. JWV is offering an
exclusive discount to all Huberman Lab
listeners with up to $400 off JW
products. Again, that's JW spelled J
Ov.com/huberman to get up to $400 off.
Today's episode is also brought to us by
EightLe. Eight makes smart mattress
covers with cooling, heating, and sleep
tracking capacity. Now, I've spoken
before on this podcast about the
critical need for us to get adequate
amounts of quality sleep each and every
night. Now, one of the best ways to
ensure a great night's sleep is to
ensure that the temperature of your
sleeping environment is correct. And
that's because in order to fall and stay
deeply asleep, your body temperature
actually has to drop about 1 to 3°. And
in order to wake up feeling refreshed
and energized, your body temperature
actually has to increase by about 1 to
3°. Eight automatically regulates the
temperature of your bed throughout the
night according to your unique needs.
Now, I find that extremely useful
because I like to make the bed really
cool at the beginning of the night, even
colder in the middle of the night, and
warm as I wake up. That's what gives me
the most slowwave sleep and rapid eye
movement sleep. And I know that because
EightLe has a great sleep tracker that
tells me how well I've slept and the
types of sleep that I'm getting
throughout the night. I've been sleeping
on an EightLe mattress cover for four
years now, and it has completely
transformed and improved the quality of
my sleep. Their latest model, the Pod 4
Ultra, also has snoring detection that
will automatically lift your head a few
degrees in order to improve your air
flow and stop you from snoring. If you
decide to try eight, you have 30 days to
try it at home, and you can return it if
you don't like it, no questions asked.
But I'm sure that you'll love it. Go to
eight.com/huberman to save up to $350
off your Pod 4 Ultra. 8LE ships to many
countries worldwide, including Mexico
and the UAE. Again, that's
eight.com/huberman to save up to $350
off your Pod4 Ultra. For example, can I
tell you a quick story, please? I want
to tell a story about a patient I had at
Cleveland Clinic, which actually, by the
way, was amazing, that Toby Cosgrove,
who's one of the most renowned figures
in medicine as CEO of was a CO Cleveland
Clinic for years, invited me to come
start a center for functional medicine
there. And we we've done, you know, been
10 years now. We've done a ton of
research. This one patient came to see
me and she had a whole list of problems.
And that's why I jokingly call myself a
holistic doctor because I take care care
people with a whole list of problems. I
want to know everything. And functional
medicine is inclusive rather than
exclusive. It's like rather than
discarding things that don't fit your
diagnosis, we want to know everything
about you of how you were born, whether
you were breastfed, whether you took
antibiotics, any traumas, any toxins
you're exposed to, whether you eat fish,
like we want to know everything. And so
this woman came to see me. She had
seriatic arthritis, which is a terrible
disease where your joints break down.
You got, you know, those heartbreak of
psoriasis, the rashes and itchy plaques
on your skin. But she had a whole bunch
of other stuff, too. She had migraines.
She had
pre-diabetes. She had depression. She
was a 50-year-old health coach who, I
mean, life coach who and business coach
who was very successful, but was
struggling. She had terrible reflux,
irritable bowel syndrome. So, she had
all these clusters of diseases. And I
said, "Gee, what do these things have in
common? What's the root?" Inflammation.
And I know you've talked a lot about
this on your podcast, but inflammation
is a sort of the root of many chronic
illnesses, whether it's obesity,
diabetes, heart disease, cancer,
dementia, autism, depression. I mean,
the list goes on and on. Autoimmune,
allergy, obviously. And I said, why
don't you you why don't we look at your
gut because you're having a ton of gut
symptoms. You have terrible bloating,
distension, what I call a food baby, you
know, you know, when you eat something,
it's like get a food baby. and she also
um had been on a history of lots of
antibiotics and steroids for her
rheumato heriac arthritis. And so I
said, "Look, why don't we just treat
your gut and then see what happens?" So
we put her on an elimination diet. We
eliminated all the inflammatory foods
and things that were causing
fermentation that could kind of cause
the back bad bacteria in her gut to
ferment the foods and cause a bloating
and leaky gut.
We basically took out dairy, gluten,
grains, sugar, processed foods, put on
whole foods, anti-inflammatory,
microbiome healing diet. We gabri
vitamin D, fish oil, some probiotics,
really simple stuff. And I said, come
back in six weeks and we'll do some
diagnostics and in the meantime do do
this program and then come back. She
came back. She said, well, all my
symptoms were gone and I stopped all my
medication. I'm like, oh, I didn't ask
you to stop your medication, right? But
she was on stellar, which cost $50,000 a
year. It's a immune biologic. She was on
a host of other do drugs from her
psychiatrist, from her migraine doctor,
for her irritable valve, for her reflux.
I mean, it was like a whole pile of
pills. She was off everything and she
had no symptoms and she was all better
and she lost 20 pounds and it wasn't it
wasn't an anomaly or a miracle. It was
just following the principles of how the
body works, you know, and and uh in that
textbook network medicine, they talk
about how we need to understand
mechanisms and causes, not just symptoms
and diagnosis. And we need to understand
that that there's multicausality for
different problems. So it may be not
just one thing that causes the disease,
right? You might have toxins, you might
be your diet, you might have your
microbiome issues, you might, you know,
have some other trauma or stress and all
those things like kind of are the soup
that then breaks the system down so it
gets sick. And so my job is basically to
see where are the things that are broken
down and how do I help repair them? How
do I remove the root causes? whether
it's mercury or whether it's mold or
whether it's you know your microbiome
having dispiosis or whether it's a
trauma that you need to deal with
through MDMA assisted psychotherapy
which hopefully will be passed soon you
know there's all sorts of things to do
to help the body but you have to have
the the framework for having the right
assessment of someone otherwise they
don't get better and and you know I've
had the privilege as working at Kenya
Ranch and my own private practice of
doing tens of thousands of dollars worth
of testing potentially on tens of
thousands of patients over decades and
seen literally millions and millions of
data points of their story and their
labs and their treatment and their
outcomes. And so I have this really deep
understanding of all the ways in which
these systems interact and connect. And
so I think people, you know, can map out
what's happening in their biology in
ways that now tell them what's really
going on. And we're seeing that
happening that the testing community is
growing and the that people want to know
what's going on their bodies and they're
using wearables and they're using CGMs
and all kind of self diagnostic tools
which I think are important because
people aren't getting the answer from
the traditional medical system. Well,
and a lot of physicians, unlike you,
frankly, don't look very healthy, which
people can say, "Okay, well, it
shouldn't be about about looks." But,
you know, if I was at the dentist and I
look up and my dentist is snaggletooth
and decaying teeth, doesn't bring me a
lot of confidence. You look pretty good
for 100, huh? You look great. And you're
and you're super vital. I think you know
this this idea of of systems biology and
health um is really important for people
to understand because you know I I
always say um well there are two sayings
I didn't say the first the first one uh
was taught to me when I was a graduate
student which is you know a drug is a
substance that when injected into an
animal or human produces a scientific
paper meaning meaning anytime you
manipulate a variable there are two
things that if you oftenimes if you
inject a drug at a high enough dose
you'll see an effect
if you deprive sleep you'll see an
effect and that points to several things
but I think both of them uh have a
vector in the direction of this uh
systems biology you know if everything
modulates everything else so if your gut
is off it's going to modulate your sleep
which is going to modulate your
cognition and if your um if you were to
boost your uh you know some vitamin
level um ridiculously high or have it
ridiculously low it's involved in
thousands of processes in the body and
so if you look at any one of those you
might see a subtle effect. I think the
challenge of reductionist science and
reductionist medicine is because the
goal in good science is to isolate
variables. You can't by definition
actually look at a whole system.
Although now with AI maybe you could
explore how adjusting one variable
impacts pretty much every major system
of the brain and body. Yeah. But it's
just very hard to do. And as somebody
who's done laboratory science for gosh
well over 25 years and instructed other
people how to do it and graduate
students and posttos I mean it's it's
it's an art but it's a it's limited in
terms of what it can reveal. Yeah. And
and we work as a system. So I think this
is what we're getting at here. So you're
saying the scientific process itself
precludes us from really understanding
things because we can't study things in
the way they need to be studied. Well,
yeah. Like let's say you come into my
lab and I want to study um how uh you
know increasing lcarnitine for instance
um impacts your mood immune system
function and sleep. I can do that study
but even that is just an infinitely
complex study. I can do dose response.
I'll probably do oral versus injectable
and then I can't control unless it's in
laboratory animals. Yeah. On a on a same
genetic background. I can't control
whether or not one person's, you know,
having a Snickers and the other person
is having a Snickers and telling me and
then one person's lying and I mean it is
so hard to do controlled science. So
what we end up doing is we end up
creating very artificial environments,
very artificial conditions and isolating
variables and outcomes and um at the
same time genomics sequencing proteomics
have allowed us to identify interesting
genes that have a potential role in
longevity or stem cells and Yamanaka
factors. And so I feel like it cuts both
ways. And so as a physician when
somebody comes in and I and I'm asking
this question so that people can think
about their own health. If people are
feeling like not well. Yeah. Right.
Where do you start? Yeah. Like like this
thing like where do you start? You start
with how you're sleeping, how you're
eating, uh skin tone. I imagine you can
look at somebody and kind of get a sense
of their vibrancy at the level of their
eyes. Like where do you start? I can
tell people's blood work sometimes just
by looking at them. There you go. So, so
where do you start? Like what what's the
what should we when we look in the
mirror in the morning? What what are we
looking for? I think it's a great
question. I I think that, you know, just
to back up one second, I think, you
know, you talked about, you know,
putting high dose of something in or a
lack of sleep. Functional medicine is
about
understanding the answer to two very
simple questions and then designing a
treatment model based on the answers to
those questions. And the questions are
one, what are you exposed to that's
interrupting your normal function?
Hence, functional medicine. What is it?
What is it that's bugging you? What's
pissing your system off? Is it? And
there's a short list, Andrew. It's it's
toxins and it can be internal endogenous
toxins or external toxins like heavy
metals or pesticides or glyphosate or a
million other things. It's infections or
microbes. So, it can be, you know,
postcoid syndrome with persistent spike
protein. It can be epsim bar virus that
leads to MS. It can be Lyme disease. It
can be your microbiome being off which
is the truth for most of us. It's
allergens which are things that your
body's reacting to both environmental
allergens or could be food allergens or
food sensitivities which is not truly an
allergen but it's more an adverse
reaction to food from leaky gut. It can
be poor diet which I think most of us
understand what that is. It can be
stress and that can be physical
mechanical stress like being hit by a
car or psychological stress or your the
meaning you make from a psychological
stress which is really what caused you
to be sick. I know you've had Gabbor on
your your podcast. No, not yet. We
haven't had no but but we've had a
number of people talking about the
relationship between mind and body and
stress and um certainly it's a profound
connection. Yeah. So you have this list
of five things that interacts with your
genome and is is really what we call the
exposome. What's what your genes are
exposed to is far more predictive than
your genome. Your exposome includes sum
total of everything you're exposed to on
the positive and the negative. All the
things I just listed, but also all the
ingredients for health. So I identify
what are the impediments for health and
then what are the ingredients for
health. And the ingredients for health
are not that complicated. We're
biological organisms, right? Despite
trying to live outside of our biological
constraints, we need the right kind of
food, right? Whole food. What does that
look like? Michael Pollen said, "Eat
food mostly plants, not too much, right?
Or not too much, mostly plants,
something like that." And it's basically
eating foods that's that's as close to
nature as you can find it. Grew out of
the ground or had a pulse. Yeah. Yeah.
Exa basically right. He says, "Eat food
that's grown on a plant that's not made
in a plant." And I used to lecture at
these churches and I said, "It's really
simple. Figure out what to eat. Ask
yourself, did God make it or did man
make it? Did God make a Twinkie? No. Did
he make an avocado? Yes. Would our
ancestors recognize it? Yeah. Like,
would your great-grandmother know what a
lunchable was or a Go-Gurt was or So, so
this generally means eating foods that
are single ingredient foods or foods
that combine only single ingredients,
single ingredient foods. Like you look
at the label, you got to I read the
labels like you look at it. Do I
recognize this? Would I have this in my
kitchen? Do I have butate hydroxy
talamuine in my kitchen or red dye
number three? Probably not, right?
Unless you're a grandma making cupcakes
that are really red. But so, so food,
fruit, vegetables, yeah, meat,
vegetables. Yeah. Quality dairy. Yeah. I
mean, I've written so many books on
this. The pagan diet, food, what the
heck should I eat? I wanted to call it
food. What the should I eat? But my
publisher wouldn't let me. But nowadays,
they probably would. I feel like they
curse everywhere.
So, there's like we can we can dive into
nutrition, but just assume like you need
depending on your age and your sex and
your what you're doing with your life,
you need the right nutrition of whole
real food. Can I just ask you, we'll
just quickly double click into there.
What's your view on seed oils?
Oi, no. Just, you know, I mean, I'll say
mine. I like olive oil and butter, uh,
coconut oil and things like avocados and
some Brazil nuts and walnuts and stuff.
So, since I don't count calories, I kind
of have an intuitive sense, um, of what
I'm taking in, how much fat, how much
protein, how much starch, how much, you
know, fibers, carbs, etc. So, for me,
like I wouldn't pick canola oil because
I could pick olive oil. Um, and I make
sure it's real olive oil and but I don't
think seed oils necessarily will kill
me. But guess why? They I know they
won't kill me cuz I don't eat them. We
should be eating whole food fats as much
as possible, right? avocados, coconut,
nuts and seeds, you know, omega-3 fats
from fish, olive oil, which is min the
most minimally processed oil you can
get, extravirgin olive oil, and
and we're eating nuts and seeds. We're
getting a lot of omega sixes. So, the
big theory behind seed oils is that it's
omega6 rich. It's imbalanced with
omega-3s. It cause inflammation. The way
they're produced and grown is
problematic. They're usually GMO crops
like canola oil. They spray lots of
chemicals on them. Those chemicals get
in the oil. They're manufactured in an
industrial way that oxidizes them, that
uses hexane to get rid of sort of some
of the compounds in it, deodorizes them,
bleaches them, and then they're easily
oxidized. So, would I want to eat an
industrial food product? Probably not.
Do we know for sure that it's a problem?
I think the data is mixed. I mean,
there's some studies that show
epidemologically that, you know, people
who eat more of these plant-based oils
or seed oils have reduced risk of
diseases, but we don't know what they're
doing. And there's food frequency
questionnaires and there these studies
are proving correlation, not causation
and what it's replacing. Sorry to
interrupt here, but you know, I'll see
the uh data that seed oils are better
for people than butter. Okay, I like
grass-fed butter, but I don't eat it in
excess. I once joked about that and I
like I made some jokes early on in
having a podcast not realizing the
implications but anyway I'm very careful
now I have some butter in moderation but
so I could imagine that if you're eating
a lot of lard and butter and bacon fat
and you replace it with seed oils you'll
get healthier but maybe maybe but you
could imagine I guess it depends on what
else you're ingesting because the carbo
the starch fat combination is the one
that gets people in my opinion but right
somebody could be eating a lot of meat
and fruit and don't eat like your butter
with a bagel, put it on your broccoli
cuz that the the saturated fat refined
starch combo is what's killing us. I
wish people would
really hear you on this. It's not fat
per se. It's not starches per se. It's
the combination of fat and starch. And
in particular, fat, starch, and sugar.
Yeah. Well, starch sugar start sugar
like below the neck. Your body can't
tell if it's a bowl of sugar or a bowl
of corn flakes or a bagel or a bowl of
sugar. So, if I put a pad of of butter
on a on a bowl of white rice, is it that
bad? No, not really. But if I put a pad
of butter on a muffin, it's bad news
bears. Yeah, it's you're doubling down
on the sugar. Yeah. And I think, you
know, to to answer your question about
the seed oil, the data is not really
completely answering this, and it's part
of the problem with nutrition. There's
not enough nutrition science. the one
large randomized controlled trial that
was done on like 9,000 people, not on 90
people or 50 people or 30 people, which
a lot of these studies are, but on 9,000
people that were randomized in a
psychiatric hospital would be unethical
to do today. It was done by Anel Keys.
It was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment
funded by the NIH where they basically
gave half the group butter and half the
group corn oil. Now, corn oil is a pure
omega-6 oil as opposed to soybean, which
is mixed omega-3, canola mixed omega-3,
six
oils. And what they found was striking.
They found that the group that had the
corn oil, for every 30 point drop in LDL
cholesterol, the risk of death from
heart attacks or strokes went up by 22%.
Which is completely the opposite of what
we think in medicine, which is LDL is
the boogeyman. this LDL is the bad
cholesterol or L for lousy cholesterol.
It's not so simple. And I think I think
the oversimplification of, you know,
let's say these seed oils lower LDL,
therefore they're good, is just too
simplistic. But but if would I would I,
for example, have a corn oil that was
expeller pressed or that was organic or
canola oil that was or sunflower or
safflower oil? Yeah, I mean I don't I'm
not worried about those in small
amounts, but that's not what most people
are doing. Most people are eating most
their diet is ultrarocessed food. 60% of
adults, 67% of kids is basically junk
food. And the major oil in those are
these refined oils. So is it the oils?
Is it the junk food? They're just a
vehicle for this. And we've increased
our consumption. For example, the main
seed oil or bean oil, it's not really a
seed, is soybean oil by a thousandfold
since 1900. Now I'm sort of an
evolutionary thinker. I'm like what did
our how are our bodies designed and what
should we be doing with them and like
you know you talk a lot about light
that's like you know you went this sleep
with the sun you woke up with the sun it
was just how things were and you had
circadian rhythms and our whole
biological clocks and rhythms are
screwed up because of how we live yeah
we evolved under the major constraint of
sunrise and sunset that's right and
artificial lighting is a wonderful thing
but um I think there's highly processed
light it's devoid of long wavelengths
the the eradication basically of
incandescent bulbs and all these LEDs
and highly processed light daylight
savings times. It It's really messing
people up. Maybe it's just an hour. No,
actually it's your mental health. Yeah.
When it comes to the seed oil thing, I I
actually predict that seed oils will
lose. I think in the end it's just
obvious like why wouldn't people just
say, you know what, the seed oil thing
may or may not be a problem. I'm just
going to eat olive oil and a little bit
of butter. Yeah, that's kind of my view.
Seems so simple to me. That's my view.
Like until it's kind of my view is if
you have a new new to nature kind of
compound or an unnaturally high amount
of something that we're having in our
diet. I mean sugar was always around. We
would get honey, whatever. But we'd have
22 teaspoons a year as hunter gathers.
Now we have that every day for every
American. If you had a magic wand and
you could get rid of seed oils or you
could get rid of um highly refined
sugars in modern American diet, which
one would be? Yeah. No contest. It's
starch and sugar that's driving our
metabolic crisis like by a huge factor.
By a huge factor. If does that mean no
pasta, no bread? It doesn't mean no no
anything. It just means the volume of
stuff we're eating is like we're eating
pharmacologic doses. It's 152 pounds of
sugar and 133 pounds of flour, which has
a higher glycemic index than sugar.
Really? Yeah. Well, that's how it's set.
It's set at at white bread as 100 and
then sugar is 80 because it's fructose
and glucose. So you have to break that
apart. And so your ins your glycemic
load, which is how it affects your blood
sugar. Fructose doesn't raise your blood
sugar. Glucose raises your blood sugar.
So where do we go wrong? Because I was a
teen in the '9s. I don't until I
discovered fitness. I I didn't eat
poorly at home. My mom cooked.
Pop-Tarts, craft macaron cheese. We
weren't allowed that stuff. But
margarine. We weren't allowed that
stuff. But we had our like honey nut
Cheerios preserved.
We had our honey nut curios and things
like that, but we ate mostly whole
foods. And then um not from there wasn't
Whole Foods market back then, but uh
whole unprocessed minally processed
foods, but I ate my fair share of, you
know, pizza slices and burritos in
college and stuff like that. But and I
was active, but I wasn't a serious
athlete. But then somewhere around 2010
forward, I feel like
everything, you know, again, just to be
very direct, there was probably one kid
or two kids in my school that were were
obese. Yeah. Now, depending on where you
live, you see 60 70 80% of kids are
obese. Yeah. So, I mean, what where what
happened? I want to answer that and then
I want to come back to the loop of what
I was trying to complete on your the big
thought of like how does the body work
and how do you create health and what do
you do because you asked me that
question I want to lose that question.
Um what what happened was there was uh
this rise in cardiovascular in America
and there was this thought that
saturated fat and fat was the bad guy
and this was the McGover report in the
70s that went on to be dietary
guidelines that went on to be the food
pyramid and the food pyramid essentially
told us that fat was the enemy so it's
only at the very tippy top fats and
sparingly bottom of the pyramid was 6 to
11 servings things are bread, rice,
cereal, and pasta a day, which sounds
like a recipe for being hungry all the
time and being obese right now. We
didn't know at the time, but it became
really clear that that was a bad idea
pretty quick. And and the hockey stick
rise in obesity, type 2 diabetes tracks
perfectly with that information. The
American public trusted the government.
They trusted the scientists. And when
they said fat's bad, carbs are good,
everybody listened. Eggs, eggs are bad,
eggs are bad, fat's bad, cholesterol is
bad, red meats beat. So people ate less
red meat, they ate less eggs, they ate
less fat. And then we got snack bell
cookies, you know, we got like, you
know, lowfat ice cream and like and the
sugar just went through the roof. And so
that's when you see this this explosive
rise. And then there's other factors.
Our microbiome affects our weight.
Environmental toxins affect our
metabolism. So there's a whole bunch of
things happen in tandem, but it that
probably is the single biggest thing. So
if someone asking for me, should I worry
about soybean oil or sugar and starch?
It's 100% sugar and starch. I'd like to
take a quick break and acknowledge one
of our sponsors, function. I recently
became a Function member after searching
for the most comprehensive approach to
lab testing. While I've long been a fan
of blood testing, I really wanted to
find a more in-depth program for
analyzing my blood, urine, and saliva to
get a fuller picture of my heart health,
my hormone status, my immune regulation
status, my metabolic function, my
vitamin and mineral status, and other
critical areas of my overall health and
vitality. Function not only provides
testing of over 100 biomarkers key to
physical and mental health, but it also
analyzes these results and provides
insights from top doctors. For example,
in one of my first tests with function,
I learned that I had an elevated level
of mercury in my blood. Function not
only helped me detect that, but also
offered insights on how to best reduce
my mercury levels, which included
limiting my tuna consumption, and
frankly, I had been eating a lot of tuna
at that time, while also making an
effort to eat more leafy greens and
supplementing with knack and
acetylcyine, both of which can support
glutathione production and
detoxification. And by the way, it
worked. My mercury levels are now well
within healthy range. Comprehensive lab
testing like that is super important for
health because basically a lot of things
are going on in our blood and elsewhere
in our body that we can't detect without
a quality blood and urine test. And
while I've strived to get those tests
for many years, it's always been overly
complicated and frankly quite expensive.
Function dramatically simplifies all of
it and makes it very affordable. I've
been so impressed by Function that I
decided to join their scientific
advisory board and I'm thrilled that
they're sponsoring this podcast. If
you'd like to try Function, you can go
to
functionhealth.com/huberman for this
week only, April 14th to April 20th,
2025. Function is offering a $100 credit
to the first 10,000 people to sign up
for a function membership. To get this
$100 credit, use the code hubberman 100
at checkout. Visit
functionhealth.com/huberman to learn
more and get started. Today's episode is
also brought to us by ROA. I'm excited
to share that Roka and I recently teamed
up to create a new pair of red lens
glasses. These red lens glasses are
meant to be worn in the evening after
the sun goes down. They filter out
shortwavelength light that comes from
screens and from LED lights, which are
the most common indoor lighting
nowadays. I want to emphasize Roa Red
Lens glasses are not traditional blue
blockers. They do filter out blue light,
but they filter out a lot more than just
blue light. In fact, they filter out the
full range of shortwavelength light that
suppresses the hormone melatonin. By the
way, you want melatonin high in the
evening and at night. Makes it easy to
fall and stay asleep. And those short
wavelengths trigger increases in
cortisol. Increases in cortisol are
great in the early part of the day, but
you do not want increases in cortisol in
the evening and at night. These ROA Red
Lens glasses ensure normal, healthy
increases in melatonin and that your
cortisol levels stay low, which is again
what you want in the evening and at
night. In doing so, these Roka Red Lens
glasses really help you calm down and
improve your transition to sleep. Roka
Red Lens glasses also look great. They
have a ton of different frames to select
from, and you can wear them out to
dinner or concerts, and you can still
see things. I don't recommend you wear
them while driving just for safety
purposes. But if you're out to dinner,
you're at a concert, you're at a
friend's house, or you're just at home,
pop those Roka Red Lens glasses on, and
you'll really notice the difference in
terms of your levels of calm and all the
sleep stuff I mentioned earlier. So, it
really is possible to support your
biology. be scientific about it and
remain social at the same time if you
like. If you'd like to try ROA, go to
roka.com. That's roka.com and enter the
code huberman to save 20% off your first
order. Again, that's roa.com and enter
the code hubman at checkout. So, um, so
the '9s lowfat thing, yeah, was a
disaster. And I wrote a book called Eat
Fat Get Thin where I cataloged the whole
history of how we got there and what the
problems were and what the science is
telling us about what we should be
eating about the reconsidering saturated
fat being bad. It's bad if you're eating
it in the context of starch and sugar.
For most people, it's not. And if you're
obese or metabolically unhealthy, it
actually can be better for you. There's
a lower risk of diabetes and
epidemological studies with butter and
milk fat. So I don't I think I think we
have to kind of like I know nutrition is
a very complicated subject but I mean or
not. Right. I don't know. I'm beginning
to think that nutrition is a very
straightforward subject. It should be.
It should. Yeah. And I I confess I've
had some pretty diametrically opposed
views from guests on this podcast. We
had Robert Lustig on the podcast. We had
Lane Norton on the podcast. You get
those two on separate podcast and they
are like at loggerheads with one
another. Right now Lane's correct in
that total caloric load matters. Yeah,
it's not everything, but it matters. I
would say many people have a hard time
limiting their intake of starchy
carbohydrates, especially if you put a
little bit of fat on there. It just
becomes a different food entirely.
Eating a bowl of white rice is pretty
tasty. Eating a bowl of white rice with
a p of butter and a little bit of salt
on there is a completely different
experience. A piece of sourdough bread
is one thing. A piece of sourdough bread
soaked in a little bit of olive oil with
some salt, I'm eating half the loaf.
Pretty good. Pretty good. Right. I have
pretty good self-control. So, so this is
where I think like we there's the
debates have become almost silly. Yeah.
And I I appreciate that you're being
very direct with us here. So, take us
back. So, you said there ingredients for
health and they're impediments to
health. So, the the ingredients for
health uh are not again not a long list
because we're human beings. We need the
right food. We need the right amount of
nutrients and it's different for
different people. You might not know
this, but Bruce Ames did an incredible
paper who recently died, one of the
giants of science, saying that one-third
of our entire DNA codes for enzymes. All
enzymes require co-actors. Most
co-actors are vitamins and minerals. And
there's a huge genetic variability in
how much different people need. Some
people need a thousand units of vitamin
D. Some people need 5,000. Some people
need 400 micrograms of folate. Some
people need 4,000 micrograms of folate.
And so he he kind of explained that very
carefully. So you have to find the right
amount of nutrients for you. You need
the conditionally essential nutrients
which people don't think are absolutely
essential things like CoQ10 and various
things that that the body requires that
we may not get enough. Then you need
light, you need water, you need clean
air, you need uh movement, you need rest
and I would say that in a
parasympathetic state kind you need
sleep, you need connection, love,
meaning, purpose. These are all
ingredients for health. And and any one
of those can make you sick, whether it's
just being isolated alone or not having
a purpose in your life. If you have a
meaning and purpose in your life,
there's a jam paper published that
you're likely to live seven years
longer. Now, if you cut out all cancer
and heart disease from the face of the
planet, the extension of life
expectancy, seven years, the mind is
incredible. I have a colleague at
Stanford who works in the sleep uh in
the in the sleep division, sleep
medicine, and he said, and I shouldn't
tell people this because everyone's
supposed to get enough sleep, right? But
he said if you positively, they've done
stud he has a a study that shows that if
you positively anticipate next day
events. Yeah. Your sleep need is
actually reduced pretty substantially.
That's good. And the quality of sleep
that you get is remarkable. Well, that's
why I slept so good last night. I was
looking forward to this. Exactly. Well,
these small things, right? Because we
all know the experience of like I only
slept 5 hours, but I got this thing
today I'm really looking forward to. You
feel great. Yeah. And so I'm not I don't
think people should only sleep 5 hours.
Most people need more than that. Uh so
the idea is basically with functional
medicine you take out the bad stuff and
you put in the good stuff and each
person has a different set of bad stuff
and a different set of good stuff and
you have to be detective and it's the
opposite of traditional medicine which
is just use a single drug to treat a
single mechanism with single disease in
a single outcome you like you have high
blood pressure take a high blood
pressure drug to lower your blood
pressure we need multimodal treatments
for multic-causal diseases and so what
English that means is we need to do a
lot of different things like if you want
a garden, you don't just say, "I'm going
to put the plant in the air and not
water it and not give it soil." Or you
say, "I'm just going to plant it in the
soil, but no light and no water." I
mean, you know, and this is the way
science is. I remember trying to do a
study on Alzheimer's at Cleveland Clinic
and the top scientists there was like,
we wanted to study this multimodal
dimensional approaches to call the
blackbox approach. Okay, we everybody's
getting a different treatment. It's
super personalized, customized based on
their own biology. There's no one such
thing as Alzheimer's or different
Alzheimer'ses. I don't know if that's a
word, but you know what I mean. And
that's why we fail so miserably with the
amaloid hypothesis because we're just
looking at the endstage phenomenon,
which is plaque going into an area
that's inflamed to kind of deal with the
inflammation. What caused the
inflammation is really the question and
it can be variable things. So, we start
to kind of map these out. And when when
you do that and you you actually get to
the root causes and you try to treat all
the things that are out of balance,
people get better. So if you have a
vitamin D deficiency and a folate
deficiency and you have a, you know,
tons of small bowel overgrowth and you
have heavy metals and you have all these
different problems, you can't just treat
one thing and expect the person to get
better. You've got to look at all those
things. And some are more primary, some
are secondary. But that's the job of a
functional medicine doctor. It's a
detective. And and for me, what's
exciting is, you know, you said, how
many people do this? Not that many. How
many people are like experts who've done
this for decades and have seen thousands
of patients? a few hundred. Wow. You
know, have we we trained a 100,000
people? We've have 3,500, I think,
certified another, I think, three or 4
thousand in the pipe to be certified.
Not that many people who can do this.
And this part of the why uh I created
this company called function health
which you've been you know so so
supportive of which is to allow people
to understand what's going on in their
own biology to be empowered to be the co
of their own health and to get the data
that's going to help them identify the
different things that are going on to
actually do something about it. Before
we move to um health uh metric
monitoring I do want to ask about
ingredients for health. You talk about
them. They're your protocols. You don't
you don't use that framing but that's
the framing is take out the bad stuff
put in the good stuff. the body knows
what to do. It's got an innate healing
system. Just give it a chance. I think
what's so um terrible about traditional
medicine, it has many wonderful
features, is that at least the way it's
communicated in this country, is that it
assumes that people are lazy and
uninterested in their own health. And I
fundamentally disagree, hence this
podcast, your podcast. I agree. I
believe people want and are willing to
take care of themselves if they know
how. Okay. So, let's just assume that
the pillars of health, right? like like
sleep, sunlight, u exercise, nutrition,
social connection, stress modulation,
microbiome, yes, etc. Okay. Assuming
that people are making some effort to do
those things correctly or a lot of
effort, what are some of the things that
you believe cannot be
accessed through diet and behaviors?
Yeah. That warrant supplementation. And
the and I've been interested in
supplements and taking supplements for
35 years. So to me when people say oh
supplements aren't regulated I say
actually they are regulated to some
extent right like there's they're
monitored um you want to find ones that
are third party tested um indeed there
are a lot of junk supplements out there
probably a lot of supplements that don't
do much there probably a lot of
supplements that are only uh use cases
for certain people who have a major
deficiency but what are some of the
things that are just very difficult to
get from food and from sun um because we
hear you know the soil's depleted
magnesium. It's hard to get enough D3.
Like if you if you were to list out,
let's just say about 10 things that you
you feel like, listen, you probably
could get it from food, but it's just
hard to get these micronutrients. What
are those things? And and by the way,
folks, this is not a preloaded
conversation. We've never had this
conversation. I know what I take, but
I'm just curious what would you because
people will try hard to get things from
food. Yeah. But what are the things that
they can't get from food or can't get
from food easily that you believe
everyone should take? Yeah, great
question. I I thought you were going
somewhere I saw you were going where
what are the things if you did
everything perfectly and you're still
sick what do you do? Oh well we'll get
to that there's a list of the things
that 80% of it you can take care of but
there's some things you need help and
that's we can talk about that. I I think
because of how dramatically our diets
changed after the industrial revolution
and because of urbanization and our
disconnection from nature. We have a
lower nutrient intake than we did as
hunter gathers. You know, I I just came
back from Africa and went to the Hodza
tribe, which is one of the last
huntergatherer tribes, and I got to
spend a few days with them, and the the
nutrient density of the diet was so much
higher. Omega-3s, vitamin D, outside
running around on loin cloth, or if
you're not, you're living in some
coastal area, were eating extremely
fatty fish, which is one of the great
sources of vitamin D in the food. Um,
they were eating phytochemicals at an
incredible rate through eating 800
different species of plants. Now we have
three main ones and 12 of the are
altogether comprise probably 95% of our
diet instead of 800 plants with all
kinds of phyitochemicals and vitamins
and minerals. The soils we're growing
food in have depleted the organic matter
because of industrial farming and soil
erosion. And the organic matter, the
living soil is what actually helps to
allow the plants to take up the
nutrients from the soil. So that there's
a symbiotic relationship between
organisms in the soil and the plant and
it uses them to help get nutrients free
so they get into the plant. So where
there's less magnesium, there's less
zinc, there's less all these things in
our diet. And when you look at the
surveys of the American population,
there's an ongoing government survey
called the National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey and essentially goes
around the country with vans test
people's blood all the time. And this is
like decades old survey and it's
incredible because you get all this
data. They find that like 90 plus% are
low in omega-3s. Uh probably 80% are
insufficient or low in vitamin D. 50some
percent are magnesium deficient. About
the same iron, you know, zinc a little
bit less, selenium a little bit less.
And it depends on where you live and
what you do and also depends on your
diet, you know, so and what your stage
of life is and what your age is and how
your absorption is. For example, when
you're older, you know, you you get
decreased ability to absorb nutrients
and decreased ability absorb, for
example, vitamin B12. So, at different
ages, you might need different things,
right? Uh, and so, what are the basics
that I think everybody should take? I
think everybody should take omega-3
fats, at least a gram or two of EPA,
DHA. Most people need between 2 to 4,000
international units of vitamin D3. I
think a good multivitamin can cover the
rest for most people. And when I say
good multivitamin, I mean when with the
right bioavailable forms of
nutrients. I was in the hospital
recently for back surgery. And this
resident came by and he was, you know,
attending saying, "Well, I said, I think
I need some, you know, magnesium because
I I I'm taking all these painkillers for
my surgery and I don't want to be
constipated." He said, "Oh, you can get
this one." I'm like, I said, "That's
magnesium oxide. That's not well
absorbed and it doesn't not the greatest
for eating magnesium citrate." Yeah. So,
I said and I was He was like, "Oh,
that's really interesting. I didn't know
that." He wrote it down. But like, so I
think Yeah, I have a lot of friends who
are physicians and I'll tell you, they
come to me for health advice, so that
tells you something. I'm not an MD.
Yeah, folks, magnesium, magnesium
citrate, l great laxative, malate for
muscles, glycinate, and and 3nate for
brain and sleep. Yeah. And glycinate for
for also if you're not, you know,
tending to be constipated, it's one that
you can tolerate and not be constipated.
It's also helps with detoxification and
sleep and other things.
Uh and and so those are the big ones and
I think you know I've been
diagnostically testing people for
decades of nutritional testing with
function. We do deep nutritional test
including omega-3 testing and homocyine
looking at methylation which is a really
important thing you've talked about in
the podcast B12 folate B6. We do vitamin
D testing and we see over 67% are
deficient and this is this is important
to understand Andrew. 67% are deficient
at the minimum level to prevent a
deficiency disease. Not the optimum
level that you I might think is good
like vitamin D over 45 or feritin iron
store over 45. They're like, "Oh, if
your vitamin is 30 or more, you're
okay." Or if your feritin's 16 or more,
you're okay. Well, if your ferin 16,
you're going to be tired. You're going
to have brain fog. You could potentially
have hair loss. You could have insomnia.
And that's just having low iron stores.
And so when we're looking at that, we're
like seeing what an incredibly
uh depleted population we are in terms
of the of the nutrients we have. So I
wish we wouldn't need them and I wish we
didn't need them. But the fact is that
unless we're eating a very structured
diet and I had a patient once who had
OCD and she's like I don't want to take
any any vitamins. I said okay. She says
but I'm going to eat I know there's
pumpkin seeds have zinc. So, I'm going
to have like 14 pumpkin seeds a day and
I need 200 micrograms of selenium. So,
I'm going to take four Brazil nuts a
day. And she went on and on like I I
know I need this nutrient. So, I'm going
to have this much liver a day. And so,
she she was able to figure it out, but
it's not easy. No. So, it sounds like
magnesium getting a gram of EPA omega-3
um 3,000 IU minimum of D3 per day. Um
some iron, some zinc, selenium. Sounds
like the the basics. Yeah. Yeah. And
would that be true for teens? Well, for
example, you're an older guy, you don't
want to take a lot of iron because
you're not get rid of it and you can get
iron toxicity. So, if you're a
menstruating woman, you need more iron.
So, but but what what I think is the key
is figure out what's right for you. Test
don't guess. Most people don't know. And
some people may need, you know, 10,000
units of vitamin D to get the same blood
level as somebody else with 1,000. And
that's because there's different vitamin
D receptors and they're genetically
determined. And you can't know by just
guessing, right? I totally agree, but I
also totally know that a lot of people
won't blood test. So, the argument
against supplements has always
been you just are creating expensive
urine, which which is a silly one
because that's based on water soluble
vitamins only, right? And by the way,
it's a stupid argument because you're
like, why drink water? I just pee the
rest out of I mean like why I'm creating
it's silly. It's a silly one. But so,
but the list that we just talked about,
D3, omega, magnesium, maybe some iron if
you're not an older guy, um, zinc,
selenium, it seems to me those would be
good things for most everybody to add to
their already healthy diet that has
enough prebiotic um, you know,
postbiotic fiber. That's and we're
seeing iodine. Interesting. Because
people are eating the iodized salt. So,
we're having sea salt and Himalayan
salt. We got too fancy with our salt and
table salt. We're not eating iodiz salt.
Now, iodine is not normally found in
salt, but it was added to salt. It's a
fortification to prevent goiters or
thyroid problems. But a lot of people
have thyroid issues. One in five women
and one in 10 men have low thyroid
function and 50% are not diagnosed. And
sometimes just a little iodine
supplementation can help. Or you can eat
seaweed, you know, or fish, but a lot of
people don't eat seaweed or fish. So,
you know, that's that's how you would
get iodine otherwise. So, I think I
think people need to kind of figure out
what's going on with themselves and
based on their diet and their
preferences. And if you're a vegan, I
mean, you know, I I think, you know,
we're we're we're seeing tremendous
deficiencies in vegans if they're not
supplemented. We hear a lot nowadays
about methylated B12. I decided to just
start taking methylated B12. Is there a
danger to taking methylated B12 if you
quote unquote don't need it? If you're
not a poor methylator, it depends how
much you're taking. mostly not, but you
you you you can overmethylate or
undermethylate. And so you don't want to
be doing too much of either or the
other. And there's genetics that are
involved in actually assessing how your
methylation pathways work. So the
genetics around B12, around B6, around
folate, and you have multiple genes that
regulate all these different pathways.
So it depends is the answer. Um and and
uh but for most people taking a good
multivitamin, and when I say good, I
mean it doesn't have any fillers or
binders or additives. It's not blue.
It's doesn't have titanium dioxide in
it. It has forms of the nutrients that
actually can get utilized and absorbed
better by the body. We talked about
magnesium oxide versus glycinate or
citrate. Um, and that you that you uh
make sure the company has integrity,
that they've third party tested for the
purity and the potency, meaning if it
says a thousand units on the label, it's
a thousand units, not 10,000 or 2,000 or
and that it hasn't have any
crosscontamination with additives or
chemicals. So sometimes, you know, you
get something with an herbal product
that comes from China. The the company
didn't realize it was full of lead or
whatever, you know, like now we're
seeing all these plant proteins with
lead in them. Yeah. I want to make sure
that we talk about the impediments,
things like mold, air, um, water,
cleanliness, things of that sort, but I
want to spend just a little bit longer
on this um, supplement thing. Um, maybe
because it's so near and dear to my
heart and because it's has sparked a lot
of confusion for me. not supplements per
se, but the reaction to them by
traditional medicine or Yeah. Why is it
that
supplementation has received um so much
push back from the medical community and
yet I would argue that since 2020 you're
going to find vitamin D3 and omegas
uh essential fatty acids and
magnesium in many many more people's
kitchens meaning they're taking it than
prior to that. Yeah. And and this
reminds me of yoga, resistance training.
You know, yoga was for yogis. Resistance
training was for bodybuilders and people
in the military. Now everybody knows men
and women, maybe even young people
should do it. Is there some argument
that they should? Um I have my thoughts
about young people lifting really heavy.
But um in any case, the breath work, you
know, there's a lot of science now.
Meditation, there's tons of science. So
these things that at one point were
considered niche, biohacking, woo, and
unsafe. Yeah.
Inevitably have be seemed to become uh
mainstream. And I think supplements is
starting to happen now. Yeah. Well, it
was interesting. When I got to Cleveland
Clinic in 2014, I said, "Let's do a
survey. There's 3,000 physicians. Let's
do a survey of the physicians about
their beliefs,
practices, desires, goals, needs around
supplements.
I was shocked. We got a lot of answers
and I I'm I'm not remembering the exact
percentages, but I'll give you the sort
of ballparks. Like it was over like do
you take supplements yourself? Like over
70% of the doctors did. Do you recommend
supplements to your patients? Probably
like 20% or less did. Would you like to
have a source where you knew the quality
and had recommendations about the
safety? Yes, we desperately want to do
that. Would you prescribe them to more
patients more if you did? No. like and
it's used if you look at every medical
specialty cardiologists are using CoQ10
right and fish oil and you've got
gastronologists using probiotics and
obviously OBGYN recommend supplements
for prenatal vitamins and you've got you
know pediatricians recommending certain
vitamins for kids and so you look across
all the specialties and you're like well
they're already kind of integrated kind
of on the margins but integrated into
their practices. I think there's this
kind of weird thing where you'd go to a
conference and I would do this doctors,
how many people recommend supplements to
their patients and you know a few hands
would go up. How do you guys take
supplements and like most of the
audience would raise their hand and I
thought that was so peculiar because in
medicine we're told from a scientific
perspective that they're probably
expensive urine and yet most doctors
personally want to take them for
themselves. That says a lot. does say a
lot. And I think we're entering an era
where I think there's more and more
science. We're understanding more about
the complexity of individuality and
biochemical individuality. And this was
this is, you know, this personalized
precision medicine. This is where we're
all headed, right? And uh one of the one
of the fathers of sort of the thinking
in functional medicine was Roger
Williams who discovered pantaththenic
acid or vitamin B5. He wrote a book
called biochemical individuality. And
actually his book was the one that got
me interested in this in college because
I live with a nutrition PhD student who
was talking about the basically the gut
flora of cows when he was studying to
understand fiber and the microbiome and
he gave me a book called nutrition
against disease by Roger Williams and it
was this is like in 1980 and I read it I
was like oh wow this is nutrition is
such an important thing. So I think
doctors are beginning to understand the
value of nutrition the value of
nutritional uh sort of supplements the
value of testing for nutrients. It's
still slow, but you know, I think I
think we're gonna get there. There's a
whole generation of physicians and
scientists that I do think in the
current shift in funding for science,
different conversation entirely, are
going to retire. And um I'm not sure
it's a bad thing. I I I don't mind
saying this. I I I'm don't mind saying
it. I think they've done a really
wonderful job and and now it's time to
pass the baton. the younger generation
and the
forwardthinking, you know, uh people in
their 60s and 70s are changing the game.
It's a very different game now and I
think it's hard for them to understand
that and um and it's got to be scary. Um
but the younger generation is much more
versed. I will say I actually would like
your reflections on something for
someone that's listening to this
conversation. They think, "Oh goodness,
now I have to buy organic foods and buy
all these supplements." And let's say
somebody has a limited budget. Yeah.
Yeah. Do you think it's fair to say,
okay, if you have a limited budget, you
would be very wise to get cardiovascular
exercise at least three days a week, do
some resistance training, uh, which can
be done with body weight. And could you
say eat, you know, eggs, fish, meat,
fruits, and vegetables,
and olive oil, and you and you're there.
Yeah. Right. And if you look at the cost
of buying food out versus that, you're
you're probably coming out ahead. Cuz
I'm thinking about the college student.
Yeah, I'm thinking about me in college
or as a posttock or a graduate student.
So, I think for for people that have
more disposable income, it makes sense.
You know, you you eat as well as you can
organic, you supplement, you do you
blood test. And I want to talk about
those things. Let's talk about some of
the impediments. And um I I do want to
keep budgetary uh restraints in mind
because I think people fall into the
category of poor, some disposable income
and lots of disposable income. And all
too often in the bio, you know, the
biohacking sphere, we're talking about
that last category. And we don't want to
we don't want to lose anyone along the
way. So air, we had fires here in Los
Angeles. It was dreadful. The beach now
all the way down to Marina del Rey. I
ran down there yesterday. It was
completely littered with chunks of
charcoal. They mow it under the sand.
It's going out to ocean.
Um, most people don't listening to this
probably don't live in Los Angeles. How
bad is our air in the United States,
Northern Europe, Australia, like like is
is there any clean air left? I mean,
yeah, maybe in the mountains in
Colorado. Okay. So, so the air is dirty.
I think I think you know compared to
what is the answer? Like if you go to
India or China or some of these
developing nations or not even
developing anymore, the air is so bad. I
mean they have all kinds of
petrochemical products they they burn.
They have coal factories. I mean it's
just it's really bad. So in America I
think the air quality in general is much
much higher. I think when you have
things like wildfires it's a different
ballgame then just the wood smoke itself
if it's just a trees burning is bad
enough but then you burning houses and
batteries and plastics and fire. You've
got PAS chemicals and we actually found
that those chemicals go up on their
function testing in people living in LA
who've actually been in the fires. Yeah.
I need to get tested again since because
I haven't been tested since the fires. I
mean, I feel fine. Yeah. But I got out
of town. I drove up to St. Louis
Abyispo, parked myself at a um at a big
pink hotel called the Madonna Inn and uh
looked looked at the horses and worked
on my boat. That's good. Uh the air felt
clean. Yeah. But is the air clean when
there isn't a fire? I mean, not
necessarily. I mean, for example, in
just just help people understand that
air air moves. It's not like there's
just LA air or, you know, Colorado air.
In Seattle, they had a big mercury
problem in the air because of China
because northeast China like Beijing and
Harbin in the winters, they just burn
huge amounts of coal and it goes up in
the air and it goes across in the in the
Gulf Streams and the and the the air
streams or whatever they call them.
Uhhuh. and it gets all the way to
Seattle and it rains, heavy metal rain.
And so no matter where you live, you're
you're kind of exposed to the collective
air. There's some for sure areas that
are much cleaner, but but I think that
you most people if they have an air
filter in your house where you spend the
most of your time, you're probably okay.
So is it a separate unit air filter or
not? You can get one for your house or
which most houses have. Make sure you
change the filters or you can get a
special HEPA air filter if you live in a
more, you know, urban area or more
environmentally toxic area. I love to
exercise outside is running and
breathing harder outside in LA or in
general. Well, I like to do that
wherever I go, but like when when I'm in
New York City, I love to run along the
the freeway. Yeah. Um probably breathing
in a lot of junk. You are. Yeah. I mean,
and the question is what what's going to
be a problem for you? Like all of us are
toxic soups, right? So, it's just the
amount over time that builds up and then
eventually sometimes things can happen.
It causes cardiovascular disease. It
causes dementia. It causes cancer. It
causes diabetes. So toxins are direct
causes of these things among other
things, diet and other things. So I
think, you know, you can't go crazy
about it. I mean, we living in the 21st
century. We are where we are unless you
want to move to like some remote island
in the South Pacific or something.
Looking pretty nice. Is looking good.
Yeah. I mean like Greenland seem to be
the 51st state maybe. Is that going to
happen? I don't know. I'm just joking.
I'm making fun of it. But I mean, you
know, like there are places, but I I
think for most of us, we have to just
manage it and like we filter our water.
I think, you know, I wouldn't drink tap
water. There's an average of 37 or eight
wastewater contaminants, including
drugs, including pesticides, including
glyphosate. I mean, in hor like
hormones, if women are taking the pill
or taking hormone replacement therapy,
where does that go? There's some amount
that gets excreted in the urine. It goes
into the water treatment plants. They
don't filter that stuff out. I mean,
they get the the bugs out, but you're
getting all that stuff in your water.
So, having a reverse osmosis water
filter is a good idea, but I think the
cost thing is really important, Andrew.
I think I think one of the people
problems people think about is that, oh,
it's expensive to be healthy. And I
think that's a myth. I think you
mentioned a lot of foundational things
like eating real food, exercising,
getting enough sleep, managing stress,
breath work. These are things that are
free. Your breath is free. You know, you
can move your body. You know, you can do
body weight if you can't even, you know,
afford bands. Food is interesting
because the food industry has been very
good at brainwashing Americans that they
need highly processed, cheap junk food,
not accounting for the actual cost of
that food, which is $3 for every $1 you
spend on that food. You're going to
spend $3 in collateral damage to your
health, to the economy, to the
environment, to social fabric. I mean,
this is a Rockefeller report on the true
cost of food. But if you actually just
look at the the actual price of the
food, uh if you eat real food, it
doesn't have to be expensive. Now, you
might not be getting a $70 ribeye that's
grass-fed from New Zealand. You might be
getting like a short ribs that, you
know, that aren't organic or grass-fed.
That's okay. Like whole grains, beans. I
mean, I I'm I'm grew up, you know, like
poor and we used to like, you know,
have, you know, liver and onions, you
know, which is like the cheapest. I
mean, that's chicken liver. Chicken
liver. Yeah. Chicken, chopped liver. You
know, what are you kidding? chicken
liver not. But you know, there's been
studies that it may cost the same or
maybe 50 cents extra a day to eat well.
And there's a guide from the
Environmental Working Group called Good
Food on a Tight Budget, which is how to
eat well for you and for your wallet in
the planet. And there, you know, we we
grew up we have borched like it was was
short ribs, which is like the cheapest
kind of meat, onions, cabbage, carrots,
tomato, can of tomatoes. It's pretty
darn cheap and you could feed your like
a family of like six for a few bucks,
you know? So, and there's been a lot
written about this, but the food
industry is great at convincing us that
it's elitist, that it's expensive, that
it's all organic. Forget about organic,
non-organic, regenerative,
non-reenerative. If you don't have a lot
of resources, just focus on eating real
food and and you will do better and feel
better and be more productive and walk
around not feeling like crap. Do you
think that one of the reasons food and
nutrition is so complicated in this
country is that with the exception of
the hamburger, the hot dog, apple pie,
and ice cream, that there isn't really
an American cuisine, you know. What's
wrong with all that? Years ago, hot
dogs, hamburger, apple pie, ice cream,
right? Well, years ago, I I uh I I had a
a girlfriend who was from the south of
France. Um she did she grew up very uh
modestly did not have um wealth at all
but her family ate very well. They put a
lot of effort into food. They put a lot
of time into food and she knew about um
she was in her early 20s. I was in my my
mid20s and um she knew probably 200
recipes for soups and soulets and like I
mean it was like it was amazing. I ate
very well. So I feel like one of the
things that's really missing in this
country is a sense of pride in the
healthy food that we can produce here.
And there's never really been a history
of it. We have kind of a picture of the
farmer and the rancher and then on the
west coast you have more of the kind of
like natural food movement, the healthy
food movement. Um uh Alice Waters and
Michael Pollen and that kind of thing,
but that's considered kind of hippie-
dippy. I lived in Berkeley so I can say
that. And so and and they've made great
effort to try and um popularize that.
But I think that's one of the reasons
that we've commoditized food now. And so
American food is junk food, cotton
candy. True. But you know what what
happened was and it was the after the
World War II and because my mother and
grandparents were pre that generation.
So they had an incredible food culture
of real food. You know, my grandmother
tells me stories or told me story she
died of, you know, plucking chickens at
the local butcher so she could get a
nickel to go to the movies. You know,
but I feel like that came by way of
people's ethnic past because they were
first and second generation. Fair
enough. Fair enough. But still, like
what happened was the industrialization
of the American food system. So after
World War II, there was all these bomb-
making factories and all these
biochemical biological warfare
factories. So they got turned into bomb
factories got turned into fertilizer,
which was nitrogen. And the bio
biological weapons were pesticides and
and herbicides. So basically pesticides
are biological weapons. They're
neurotoxins. That's how they kill the
insects. They or sterilized. And then we
thought everything industrial is good.
You know, remember in the 60s, you
probably remember they had like better
living through chemistry through Dupant
and didn't realize it was killing
everybody, right? And the World's Fair
and I mean I I grew up in Queens and in
the World's Fair was in Queens in 1965
and I went and I I didn't obviously
remember that skit, but I've seen things
about it. So the the the
industrialization of the food supply,
the agricultural industrialization with
mechanization, the destruction of the
soil, the the growing of starchy
carbohydrate crops to feed a growing
hungry world. We we we wanted that like
we now produce 500 calories more per
person in America than we actually need
to eat and we export a lot of that. So
the industrialization was a thing and
then in the 50s the food industry
started to make a lot of processed food
and they were completely taken off guard
because there's this woman named Betty
who was an home teacher who was part of
the federal extension workers that was a
paid for federal program to send people
out to young families to teach the
mothers how to and it was sexist because
it was the mothers how to cook and how
to garden and how to grow their own food
and how to be independent and how to eat
real. It was like really great. And
there was a big meeting of in in in
Minnesota around that time, General
Mills sponsored, but all the big food
companies came and they decided
convenience had to be king. And we had
to make that a value. They invented
Betty Crocker, not a real person, Betty
Crocker cookbook. You might remember
that cookbook, but it was like, oh, add
one can of Campbell's cream of mushroom
soup to your casserole or add one roll
add one roll of Critz crackers to your
broccoli casserole. So, they insinuated
that. And there were TV dinners and I
grew up in that area. And then there was
like you know the food of astronauts
like Tang and Fleshman's margarine
better than butter and so a cup of
noodles. Yeah. Yeah. We basically got
this whole culture of like convenience
and then you deserve a break today from
McDonald's. And we basically
disenfranchise people from their
kitchens. We we have whole generations
of Americans who don't know how to cook,
who don't know anything about shopping
or where vegetables come from. I mean,
Jimmy Oliver done a whole television
show series in West Virginia where kids
didn't know what a tomato was if they
saw a tomato or a carrot or they
couldn't name a vegetable, right?
Because they had never seen one. And and
and now most of America is like that.
And so they have succeeded in
disenfranchising ourselves from our
kitchen. We need to they've hijacked our
kitchens, our brain chemistry, our
metabolism, our hormones. We need to
take it back. And it's like the body
snatchers. like we need to take our
bodies back, own our own biology,
understand that we're in charge,
understand that we shouldn't abdicate
our health to anybody else, including
the doctor. You have a doctor as a
partner, as an adviser, as a
collaborator, but like they're not God
and they don't know everything. And and
now with the advent of, you know, self-
testing, like like function health is
like a$137 a day. It's still money, but
it's affordable for most people. And our
a lot less than a than a latte. Yeah.
It's like, and we do $15,000 worth of
tests for for $4.99 a year. And you get
a panel of tests that tells you what's
really happening. And people can own
their data and own their biology and be
proactive and preventive and actually
understand what's happening way before
they get into real trouble. I'd like to
take a quick break and acknowledge our
sponsor, AG1. AG1 is a vitamin mineral
probiotic drink that also contains
adaptogens. I started taking AG1 way
back in 2012, long before I even knew
what a podcast was. I started taking it
and I still take it every single day
because it ensures that I meet my quota
for daily vitamins and minerals and it
helps make sure that I get enough
prebiotics and probiotics to support my
gut health. Over the past 10 years, gut
health has emerged as something that we
realize is important not only for the
health of our digestion but also for our
immune system and for the production of
neurotransmitters and neurom modulators,
things like dopamine and serotonin. In
other words, gut health is critical for
proper brain function. Now, of course, I
strive to eat healthy whole foods from
unprocessed sources for the majority of
my nutritional intake. But there are a
number of things in AG1, including
specific micronutrients, that are hard
or impossible to get from whole foods.
So, by taking AG1 daily, I get the
vitamins and minerals that I need, along
with the probiotics and prebiotics for
gut health, and in turn brain and immune
system health, and the adaptogens and
critical micronutrients that are
essential for all organs and tissues of
the body. So, anytime somebody asks me
if they were to only take one
supplement, what that supplement should
be, I always say AG1 because AG1
supports so many different systems in
the brain and body that relate to our
mental health, physical health, and
performance. If you'd like to try AG1,
you can go to drink
AG1.com/huberman. For this month only,
April 2025, AG1 is giving away a free
one-mon supply of omega-3 fish oil along
with a bottle of vitamin D3 plus K2. As
I've highlighted before in this podcast,
omega-3 fish oil and vitamin D3 plus K2
have been shown to help with everything
from mood and brain health to heart
health and healthy hormone production
and much more. Again, that's
drinkagg.com/huberman to get the free
1-mon supply of omega-3 fish oil plus a
bottle of vitamin D3 plus K2 with your
subscription. The confusion for me has
been the push back on self-directed
health. Yeah, you know, it's I I had
something come to mind as you were
saying all this, which is that I do
believe that until health becomes a
point of national pride for Americans
that we're going to become the sickest
nation in the world. No, we are really,
you know, well, well, we're going to
continue to be, right? But there's this
thing that happens when you start taking
care of your health. And I know this
because in college, I decided to stop
drinking as much as everyone else around
me drank. It was it was insane. It was
unbelievable the amount of binge
drinking and just the frequency like
Wednesday, Thursday, Fridays. I was
like, "This is crazy." And and I got
really into working out and sleep and
studying and you know, I had to be a bit
lonely in order to preserve that life.
But I got teased a lot for being
healthy. Yeah. But the point being
that it still takes
some self-confidence, rigidity, and um
kind of determination to push off the
people like, "Oh, it's so self-focused
to, you know, focus on your health." You
know, you're spending money on these on
vitamin D3, you know, um or oh, you
can't have a slice of pizza. It's like,
no, you can, but the point is maybe you
don't want to because you have a certain
amount of of self-ride, not because
pizza can't be amazing. There are some
amazing pizzas by the way, but most
pizza's crap and some pizza is amazing
and it's worth it to wait for the
amazing pizza in my opinion. So the I
guess the idea here is what we really
need it seems is a it's kind of a
psychological cultural
uh medicine revolution and a true
revolution given the way things are
going with the obesity rates. And so I
do want to talk about MA, make America
healthy again. I'm not formally involved
in Maha. Um I know people um involved in
it and know people who know people who
know people. I know people who know
people and and and I I am in discussions
with them. They've asked questions. I've
provided answers where I could provide
answers. But the push back on maja is
what I'd like to understand because you
and I sit from a unique vantage point
and you in particular where you have a
lot of colleagues and understanding of
the traditional med medical community.
So as they they always say like uh
that's not the guy you got to get. You
don't need to get the guy that's like
watching podcasts and and taking
supplements and um but what about the
guy or gal who is like I don't know my
doctor says this is crazy. They want to
like get rid of vaccines and they want
everyone doing push-ups and you know and
they don't want to take and you know and
so maybe because I see you Mark as
somebody who can potentially bridge this
divide. Um knowing people on both sides
I really see you as somebody who can do
that. I'm not saying that just because
you're sitting here and large part
you're sitting here because of that. So,
how do you change millions of people's
mindset about health when now maja has
become a red label thing? Yeah. How do
you do it? It's crazy. Either
Republicans are going to get healthy and
Democrats aren't. It's crazy to me. Or
or there's an opportunity here. And and
I do think that they're I know they're
drawing you in for this and I'm so glad
they are because I do think that you're
somebody who really believes in in
inclusivity in the real sense of the
word. So, what do you think it's going
to take to make America healthy? And
this is not Maha propaganda. This is
just can Maha do it? What do they need
to do better? What do they what can what
can you do? What can we all do? It's a
great question. And you know, it's funny
to me. I was thinking as you're talking
about how, you know, when Michelle Obama
started her Let's Move campaign, it was
a blue issue. A lot of the people who
were like pushing this agenda was
Shelley Pingry who's a Democrat from
Maine or uh McGovern, Jim McGovern who's
from Massachusetts or Cy Booker
introduced all these bills about food
safety in the last Congress and all of a
sudden it's like it flipped and became a
Republican issue which is staggering to
me and we now see bills in you know a
few dozen states or more actually. Now
every day I hear about new bills that
are helping push forward an agenda to
fix our food system. And before you dive
in, I will I just want to seed this
answer with one thing. Forgive me
audience. They don't like it when I
interrupt.
But the goal of the left, if I may,
seems to be to make anyone associated
with health and maja on the right a
jock, not a scientist. Yeah, that's what
I'm seeing. They're trying to take away
their science credential. Yeah. And make
them a jock. Now, Bobby Kennedy is not a
formerly trained scientist, but um the
scientists that are going into NIH
directorships, who I can't share who
they are besides Jay, it's been
announced the other ones, but you know
who they are. These are serious
scientists. These aren't jocks. No,
these are people that may or may not
lift weights. These are people, but but
there seems to be this effort to say
we're going to we're going to strip Maha
of its power by making it a bros science
biohacking jock thing. Real science is
about reductionist stuff. And I just
say, listen, it's all it's all valuable.
Yeah. And so I'm I'm fundamentally
frustrated and it hasn't even begun. So
educate us. I mean, listen, you know, my
friend Rick Warren said, "I'm not
leftwing or right-wing. I'm for the
whole bird, otherwise you'll fly around
in circles." I like that. Who said that?
Rick Warren. Yeah, we did. Rick Warren
is a head of Saddleback Church, which is
an evangelical church in Southern
California. I we did a whole program
with this church where we got auh 15,000
people to lose a quarter million pounds
in a year by doing health together in
groups and it was it was amazing
actually. I love that quote. It was a
great quote and and you know health
isn't red or blue or purple. It's like a
human issue and it's to make but to make
it partisan. It doesn't make any sense
to me. And yet we live in a partisan
world and anything the Democrats do the
Republicans going to hate. Anything the
Republicans do the Democrats are going
to hate. It's like, "Hey guys, can we
just talk to each other and have civil
discourse and agree on the things we can
agree on and disagree on the things
we're going to disagree on?" And I and I
know that I know behind the scenes
there's collaboration bipartisan on
these issues. There's bipartisan caucus
that Well, on the psychedelic issue, I
was at a meeting where, you know,
Governor Rick Perry, former Governor
Rick Perry, Texas, like who describes
himself as a knuckle dragging
Republican. Those are Rick's words, by
the way. Rick's a very nice guy. And
there were several members of the the
Dems there. And you got Rick Doblin who
was like a you know counterculture uh
conscientious objector during the
Vietnam War and they're all up there
being proponents for psychedelics for
the treatment of PTSD and veterans. So
they've joined hands. Yeah. I think
that's one area that's very exciting.
It's not happening in nutrition. No,
it's not happening on this thing of get
exercise. Those have become red labels.
Yeah. It's unfortunate because you know
Americans are suffering. You know,
Americans are really suffering now. 93%
of us have some metabolic dysfunction.
Psychiatric illness is on the rise in
both kids and adults. Autoimmune
diseases are skyrocketing. Obviously,
obesity is a huge problem. Diabetes is a
huge problem. You know, heart disease
deaths are going down, but the incidence
is going up. Meaning, you're there's
more people getting it, but because we
have better treatments, they don't die
from it. Same thing with cancer. So,
we're not winning on the health front in
the war on on chronic disease. we're
losing disastrously and so we have to
come together as a country to solve this
and it's unfortunate been polarized. I
think I think the good part about um
COVID was that people became aware that
this edifice of science and medicine had
cracks in it and that they needed to be
more empowered around their own health
and to start questioning things. And I
think that's part of the genesis of this
bigger wider movement around make
America healthy again and why Bobby
Kennedy was able to catalyze huge base.
He was Democratic candidate at first,
then he was independent, now he's in a
Republican administration. It doesn't
mean he's shares all the ideology that
they have, but he cares about this
issue. And so I think I think what's
happening and behind the scenes is that
there's a lot of bipartisan interest in
how do we begin to address this? Look,
the healthc care bill is $5
trillion. Of that, the government,
federal government pays 40%. It's one in
three federal tax dollars. So one in $3
that you paid for your taxes goes to
health care. Of that 80% is mostly for
chronic disease that's either
preventable or reversible through
intensive lifestyle therapy and and you
know some things around the margins. If
insurance is private, how does that
work? Like how is it that my money is
going to take care of somebody who has
heart disease? For example, like like if
you get on to Medicare Advantage, that's
that's a government program, but it's
administered by Humanana or by Sigma or
by these insurance companies kind of
deploy federal resources to deliver
healthcare. But if you actually look at
the end to end, whe it's Medicare,
Medicaid, Indian Health Service, the
federal employees, children's health
program, you just add up all the things
that the government pays for, it's it's
almost $2 trillion a year for for health
care. And most people don't realize
that. So the government has enormous
levers. And when I was sitting in my
office treating my patients who are, you
know, just endless stream of people with
chronic illnesses coming in, diabetes,
obesity, autoimmune disease, this that
the other thing, I'm like, why is this
patient sick? Well, it's mostly because
of the food they're
eating. And if that's the problem, then
what's the cause of the food they're
eating? Well, it's our food policies.
And what's the cause of our food
policies? It's the food industry that
has pressured our government to into
creating a food system that's harming
us. And we have very different policies
than they do in Europe. For example,
they don't allow many GMO foods or
glyphosate. They don't there's 10 high
fructose corn syrup. They have it there,
but it's limited. I mean, more limited
the toxins. There's 10,000 additives to
food in America. There's 400 that are
allowed in Europe. Okay. Let me ask you
a question about toxins because I've
been watching this very closely online
recently. And folks who are more of the
traditional science background who are
kind of like to spend a lot of their
time trying to debunk folks like you um
or people that talk about food additives
say that these are infantestimally small
amounts of these dyes that the amount
required to kill a rat like the you know
is 3,000 times higher. My stance on this
is the same as going through the x uh
you know the x-ray machine at the um uh
at the airport which is true. you can
walk through and not get cancer. But
dose frequency, but if you're going but
if you're going through it multiple
times per per month or year, then you
know and it's compounding with other
things. So it's it like you said dose,
frequency, and duration and the
interactions like you know when these
things are studied they might be studied
one at a time but what if you put
thousands of them together whether it's
environmental chemicals or food
additives and I don't think the food
added themselves although there are many
that are problematic that are linked to
cancer linked to allergy linked to ADD I
think there are there are a lot of data
about this but the real issue is where
do you find these you find these in
extremely low quality quality health
destroying foods that are ultrarocessed
foods that are high in starch and sugar,
high in refined oils, high in these
additives, right? They're not creating
orange stakes. Yeah. You're not like
you're not getting these chemicals when
you order broccoli at a restaurant,
right? So, how do you tease out all of
it? How do you do human trials on this?
It's very hard. But in in Europe, they
have the precautionary principle was you
have to prove it's safe before we add it
to the food supply. Krisco is a great
example. Krisco was invented in 1911. It
was shortening because there was a
butter shortage. And so they basically
created this product which is blowing
hydrogen atoms into liquid vegetable oil
that makes it act like a like an animal
fat like lard or butter. And it was
cheap and it was good. It was so it was
in the supply from 1911 to 2015.
It wasn't until 50 years after the data
be started to become clear that this was
a cause of heart attacks that this was
very dangerous. We shouldn't be eating
margarine. I remember a tub of that in
our cupboard when I was a kid. I grew up
on flesh's margarine, you know, and and
it wasn't until the scientists who've
been studying for 50 years, who was 90
years old at the time, sued the FDA and
forced them to really do something about
it that it got taken off the generally
recognized as safe list, which is called
the grass list. Now, you asked about
maha. One of the first things Robert F.
Kennedy did and I helped advise him on
this was to help address the grass
problem because there's something called
the grass loophole. If you're a food
company, you can go to the FDA and says,
"Hey, I got this great new chemical. We
checked it out. Totally safe. Not a
problem. We're going to add it to the
food. Just take our word for it." And
the FDA goes, "Great. No problem. You go
right ahead." Imagine if a drug company
did that and said, "Oh, we have this
great new drug. We've done all our
tests. It's perfectly safe. It's very
effective. Can you please give us
approval? And we're not going to give
you any
data. That's exactly what happens in
America. Now, that's different than in
Europe, which they do the opposite. You
have to prove that it's safe before it's
added to the food supply. Here, you're
you're innocent until proven guilty,
which is fine for humans, but not for
chemicals we put in our food. The other
day I saw something on X that if true,
and I'll put a link to it, uh was
probably the most troubling thing I've
ever seen in public health discourse.
And um and I want that to lead to a
question for you. Um this was an example
of a a hearing in Washington where a
young woman um I believe she's from
Austin who's a kind of like health
health food advocate. Yeah. advocate but
with training uh from uh university down
there uh was lobbying against soda in
the um government funded lunch program.
Lunch or food stamp um SNAP program.
SNAP is the food stamp. Okay. It's
called supplemental nutrition assistance
program, but there's no N in there.
Okay. Our goal is to put the N back in
SNAP. Got it. Okay. Because just to just
clarify, food security is having enough
calories. Nutrition security is having
enough nutrients. We provided for food
security, meaning you can get all your
calories from soda and, you know, sugar,
but that doesn't mean you're have
nutrition security. And we see many of
the people who receive these federal aid
programs are the ones who are most sick,
right? The most using our healthare
system. Thanks for that clarification.
Uh, this young woman advocating for
healthier food was, uh, arguing for
getting sugary soda. This wasn't diet
soda, sugary soda out of the SNAP
program. Mh. and she made her case. It
was terrific case. Well, well
articulated, I think, and was
wellreceived by both the um blue side
and the red side of the room. Yeah.
Yeah. And then someone tapped into the
microphone. This was a gentleman
representing the American Heart
Association. Oh. The American Heart
Association and he proceeded to say that
he opposed the removal of sugary soda.
Do you know why? I thought, okay, this
has got to either be AI generated, it's
fake. But then one of the women who on
the panel who was listening, okay, one
of the people making decisions or at
least running it up the flag pole for
decisions said, "Wait, wait, do you
realize what you're saying?" And he just
kept repeating this like a broken
record. And I thought, "Okay, the
American Heart, if it was the American
Soda Association or Beverage Association
or Hydration Association even, I would
have thought, okay, maybe there's
something here." But but he was there
representing the American Heart
Association. I have no skin in this
game. Okay, I don't drink sugary answer
that question. I was shocked and I will
provide a link to this in the show not
captions. I was shocked. He shouldn't
be. He shouldn't. And I thought to
myself, this guy's arguing for sugary
soda on on behalf of the American Heart
Association. And these are sugary sodas
that the American taxpayer is paying to
try and help some of the least healthy
and lowest income people in the country
drink more soda. And it wasn't like take
away soda and don't replace it with
anything. It was, you know, replace it
with some other there's double bucks for
fruits and vegetables or even water,
right? So, um, I was shocked. Yeah. I
verified it's real. Yeah. And Okay. So,
I'd like your thoughts on that, but I'm
guessing what they are already, but
here's what I want to know. Is the FDA
and our government so strongly impacted
by these food companies? You hear this,
but it always sounds like a bunch of
conspiracies. Is General Mills like and
um really like like lobbying behind the
scenes? I mean, is it is there really a
network of of people trying to harm us
for profit? 100%. Yes. So, I was telling
the story I was in my office seeing
patients with diabetes. I'm like, what
caused the food policy? And then I
started to go down that rabbit hole and
I wrote a book called Food Fix: How to
Save Our Health, our communities, uh,
our economy, our communities, and our
planet one bite at a time where I mapped
out from field to fork the problems with
our food industry, how it's making us
sick, how it's costing us trillions of
dollars, and how to fix it. And then I
started a nonprofit where I've been in
Washington doing this work over the last
5 years, way before it was Maha was a
thing. And you know what you just
described is part of a large cohesive
strategy by the food industry to
undermine science under on manipulate
public trust and information to control
the government and academic institutions
and many things. So I'll just kind of
lay it out for you. Sounds conspiracy.
It sounds like it is. And it it kind of
it's kind of I won't say it's a
conspiracy. It's just their business
strategy, right? Which is to circle the
wagons. Okay. They fund the American
Heart Association. So the food and farm
industry spent
$192 million that they give to the
American Heart Association. What does
the American Heart Association do with
it? They educate people about nutrition.
They hold meetings. They have scientific
panels. But what is the basis for sugary
soda? Like there can't there's no single
argument for sugar. If you get if you
get $20 million from the soda industry,
I mean it's like that. Andrew, I'm think
diet soda of all. Then we could we could
argue artificial sweeteners, but at
least we know it can help people lose
weight. They're ingesting less sugar and
no this is like 40% of the academy of
nutrition and dietetics, which is the
National Nutrition Organization comes
from the food industry, the American
Diabetes Association, the American
Academy of Pediatrics, the American
Family Practice. This has to change. I
mean, there was a there were Coca-Cola
gave a multi-million dollar donation to
the American Academy of Family Practice,
and there were family doctors that quit
in droves because of this. When did this
start? I think it's been growing. And
so, so there's multiple strategies they
have. One is massive lobbying. Two is
funding professional. Was this in the
80s, the '9s? I think it's been slow
creep over the since probably the 70s is
my guess. You look in the 60s and the
beach pictures like there's nobody
overweight, right? When I was growing
up, there were probably two fat kids in
school. Yeah. Yeah. They've done all
these strategic things around lobbying
around funding professional
associations, funding academic research,
12 times as much academic research on
nutrition as the federal government
spends. They co-op uh social groups like
NAACP and the Hispanic Federation so
they won't oppose things like uh things
that they care about or they'll oppose
things they care about like soda taxes.
And they fund fake science groups like
the American Council on Science and
Health. It's attacked me, maybe attacked
you, too. I I'm sure they will have
unbiased science, unbiased science and
all these great sounding organizations
that are simply front groups for for
misinformation, crop life and and so
they have a whole strategic approach
that is very detailed and and I map the
whole thing out in in my book and and
how it's so insidious and how it
happened while everybody else was
asleep. And I know personally now that
the the some of these big uh
associations that are the lobby groups
for these big food companies and a
companies and sea companies that they're
circling ranks that they're creating a
war plan that they have a complete
strategy of how to put forth mis mis
kind of I would say manipulative
science. They they have grassroots lobby
efforts where they're activating fake
grassroots movements. They're lobbying.
They're look looking at how to pressure
state governments to not do what they're
doing. I mean, I know personally the
governor of West Virginia who's has a
now there's a state bill to actually
which probably hopefully passed by the
time this podcast comes out that gets
rid of uh chemicals and the food in West
Virginia, which is the fattest state in
the nation. And they know the amount of
pressure, millions and millions of
dollars of pressure they're putting on
him to not do it. It's going to destroy
their businesses. It's going to destroy
the economy. It's going to create the
people of West Virginia suffering. I
mean so much pressure on politicians who
don't actually understand these issues
and so they're like and you know I
remember what's confusing even as
somebody who is fairly versed in health
and nutrition like I'm I'll give you an
example I mean it's not confusing I'll
give you an example. So, so I was
working on a bill that was uh with Andy
Harris, who's a doctor in Congress, to
do a pilot study to see the impact, not
to change policy, just to say the impact
of what would happen if you took soda
off the list of acceptable things you
could buy with food stamp dollars, just
to do a pilot in a couple of states. You
think, well, let's just do a scientific
study and see what happens. The
Democrats were completely opposed to it.
They shut the whole thing down. On what
grounds? The hunger groups. It's based
on this idea of like we're going to take
care of the poor. It's discriminatory.
It's aggressive. It's going to hurt the
poor. And the hunger groups that are
these big groups that that that try to
deal with hunger in America are funded
by and their boards of directors are
staffed by people from big food. So it
if you just follow the money, you see
how it all is connected and how it all
flows together. And what are big food?
So like what are the companies? Okay. So
there there are companies you know
about. There's even things like Primal
Kitchen which you think is like a great
natural brand and started by Mark Sis
and it's salad dressings and ketchup
without high fructose corn product. It
was they're all bought up by the big
food companies like Manderlay or by
Craft Craft Hind for example bought
bought that or Hugh Chocolate which
thank God will stay the same forever
because Jason Carp was a friend made
sure they would but they bought Hugh
Chocolate which we think is a natural
brand. It's the biggest selling premium
chocolate in America. So they buy all
the other companies. So it's Nestle,
it's Gun Lever, it's the known, it's
Manderlays, it's Craft Hinds. So it's
it's a few companies that that really
probably 10 or so companies that
basically are the big companies and then
there's all the A and seed and chem
companies. It's all consolidation. So So
there used to be like hundreds of seed
companies. Now there's five. There used
to be like dozens of fertilizers
companies. Now there's just a few. If I
take a step back from this, I say, okay,
well Mark I haven't tried Primal
Kitchen, but I hear good things, right?
I Mark seems like a very healthconscious
guy. So Mark Sison, right? So if his if
his brand was bought up by one of these
major companies, why aren't they
promoting the healthier foods in in
their catalog? Well, they do. They do,
but also without if there's like Jason
Carp with Hugh Chocolate made them in
the contract promise they would never
change the ingredients ever. I see. And
and when you often get these other
products that have been bought up by
these big companies, they modify the
recipes, they make it cheaper, they
squeeze their margins to be bigger. So
it's it's not like you're going to get
like, you know, Amy's whatever pizza or
whatever sounds like great healthy
pizza, but they modify it. I see. And so
I I think, you know, as a whole, they
still get most of their profit margin
from their legacy products of junk,
right? So they don't they don't want to
cannibalize that, but they also want to
suck up the rest of the market. So they
have a monopoly. I see. And but it's but
it's there's probably a few dozen cos
that c that that uh are in control of
everything from what seeds are planted
to what chemicals are sprayed to the the
uh food companies that process the food
to the fast food companies. It's not
that many companies and it's a few dozen
CEOs that control the biggest industry
in the planet that employs more than
everybody else because everybody eats.
It's like 16 trillion dollars. Are you
and Bobby going to change the uh the way
that works? I mean that's the goal. I
mean, the idea is is to to raise
awareness, to create transparency, to
help people understand what's what, and
to take the the veil back and say you
can choose whatever you want to eat.
We're not taking away your McDonald's.
We're not taking away your soda, but
like at least you should know what's
going on. If you go to South America,
you're from Argentina. I'm sure you've
been there. Not in too recent past. You
know, if you pick up something that's
not good for you, it tells you on the
label. It's like black warning signs and
hazard signs and stop signs and well
there the opposite problem exists. You
know as as the child of a first
generation immigrant my dad always said
you know the United States is the one
country where the poor are overweight
because calories are cheap. You go to
Argentina and you see these
neighborhoods are t of immense poverty
right and people are not overweight.
People are struggling to find food. Some
are, some aren't. Like if you look at
there was a whole series in the New York
Times a few years ago about how for
example Nestle went into the the the the
ghettos of of I think Peru and Colombia
and they they were just Brazil and they
were just pushing through local like
community members and reps would drive
around like with little carts or push
the carts around where there's not even
a street to sell all this crappy
processed food to people for pennies,
right? And so that's what they that's
what they've done. They've infiltrated
everywhere in the planet. So it was far
back as
1986 and I did a public health
expedition with Johns Hopkins to Nepal.
We got off the plane at some remote
airport on a grass strip and then we
walked for a week up into the almost to
Tibet and you know there were no roads,
there were no cars, there was no
electricity, there was no running water,
but there was Coca-Cola. And you see
these these sherpas literally with like
probably I don't know 100 200 pounds of
Coca-Cola on their back climbing up the
mountains bringing into every little
village, right? I mean I there's even a
TED talk on this by somewhere Melinda
Gates or something about how Coca-Cola
is a business model for how we, you
know, get safe stuff around the world
because they they had the incredible
distribution. So even where you can't
get water, you can get Coca-Cola where
they actually need quality. Protein is
what's scarce. It's often cheaper than
water in many countries like in Mexico.
So I think I think we we we have to face
the fact that we've had had this sort of
unadulterated uninhibited run from the
industry and now there's somebody
talking about why they need to think
about doing things differently, how they
need to reformulate, how they need to be
partners. I mean there was a big meeting
with the Consumer Brand Association and
Robert F. Kennedy last Monday in in the
White House where he said to them
essentially, "Here's what you need to
do. Do it or we're going to make you do
it." you know, get the crap out of the
food and let's get focused on the harm
that this is causing in terms of the
amount of starch and sugar and
processing and products in there that
are not good for human health. And and
if you don't, we're going to do
something about it. They they they can
create better front of package labeling
to trans to transform people's
perception of what's good or not. And
labels are super confusing in this
country. I mean, I know how to read
them, but you have to be a PhD or study
this your whole life to understand how
to read a nutrition facts label, how to
read an ingredient list, what it means,
what the serving size is, what the
calories are, what the this and that is.
It's like, you know, it's not easy for
the average American. It should be easy.
Like, it's intentionally confusing.
100%. Well, single ingredient or minimal
ingredient foods solve that. I'd like to
take us from one controversial topic,
and thank you, by the way, I I should
say before moving on from that, um, for
being involved and staying involved. I
know your uh inherent goodness and your
desire to keep things nonpartisan and to
do what's best for people um and to keep
it out of the politics as much as
possible. So these are these are not
these are things I've been working on
for years and so I'm just whether you
I'm just being me whether it's medically
tailored meals or raising the awareness
around chronic disease or the effect of
toxins in our environment or the role of
sugar and starch in our metabolic
crisis. I mean these are things that are
not new. I've talked about these for
decades. Now all of a sudden it's a
political issue. I don't understand why
you're not putting on a new hat. uh
you're not putting on a new hat.
Government's putting on a new hat,
getting involved in these things. I'm
I'm hopeful. Um they've always been
involved, but they just have been
involved unknowingly by by allowing
policies to be implemented that support
things like soda and junk foods. If you
look at other countries food food
assistance programs, you can't buy that
Right. Right. Let's talk about
something almost as controversial one
something that I have kind of a neutral
opinion on um that I think is a
beautiful scientific story um which is
GLP1 agonist. Yeah. Um you know
discovered on the basis of the the Hilo
monster which doesn't need to eat very
much over um or synthesizes a lot of
this peptide which limits its hunger and
uh it works at the level of the brain
and at the level of the gut.
Um there are however lots and lots of
cells including neurons outside the
appetite system that um use and bind
GLP-1. The drugs that increase GLP1. We
had a guest on here. So um Zachary
Knight came on here beautifully
explained how the drugs that increase
GLP-1 increase it many thousandfold.
Yeah. Above natural levels to have it
exert its effect of um of reducing
hunger. It is reducing obesity. Yes,
people lose muscle. They're break it
down for us. Let's assume that somebody
has just had a terrible time losing
weight. They don't even feel like they
can exercise for either motivational
reasons or they're structurally. Let we
all know they should exercise and maybe
they'll get there, one would hope, but
although you can't exercise your way out
of a bad diet, right? Right. Um do you
think there are use cases for GLP1 that
warrant its prescription? And what's the
controversy with GLP-1 all about? Is it
the dependence, the the insurance? I
mean, we don't have three hours to parse
this, but I can give you the quick Yeah.
What's your view on GLP1? Because I
think, you know, some people have
clearly benefited from it. Other people
probably don't need it all. I don't take
it. I wouldn't take it, but I'm pretty
good at regulating what I put in my
mouth. So, look, I mean, I think that
like you said, this is a molecule that
the body naturally makes to regulate
appetite, but is being given at doses
that are far greater than that which our
body naturally makes. And when you
overdo something, there are downstream
consequences. Insulin is a
peptide. Ompic is a peptide. GP1 these
drugs are peptides. These are small mini
proteins. Think of that as what a
peptide is. And insulin if you take too
much of it will kill you. Like literally
you you'll go into hypoglycemic shock.
So when you start messing with big
doses, it has not side effects. We call
these side effects. These are just
effects we don't like and we call them
side effects. They're effects of the
drug and they can lead to everything
from things you mentioned like muscle
wasting which is a big problem because
you lose the weight and you lose muscle
and fat and if you lose half it is
muscle then your metabolism slows down
because muscle burns seven times as much
calories as fat and when you gain the
weight back if you stop which over 65%
of people do. Is that right? Yeah.
People who come off it gain the weight
back 100%. They just start eating more
again and they have lower muscle mass
and then you're in a worse situation
because you have a lower muscle mass. So
you could eat literally the same amount
of calories as you were before you lost
weight and gain weight because your
metabolism is messed up. What if they
exercise using resistance train? I
personally think it should be illegal to
prescribe these drugs unless they're
combined with a nutrition consult to
educate people about their protein
requirements that are increased and with
an exercise or a trainer physiologist or
trainer to help them develop a strength
training program and then I'd be more
okay with it. And I think doses also, do
we need the doses that people are
prescribed through pharmacologically
approved drugs or there's a whole black
market of GLP-1 peptides you can buy for
20 bucks a month, not 16 or 1,700 bucks
a month. People are starting to discover
those. They're very inexpensive. They're
very inexpensive and you know you have
to know what you're doing and you have
to probably get the guidance of the
physician and there are doctors who do
prescribe these sort of subfarmacologic
doses that that are being given and they
work and they can be that can be a
useful tool but they're a tool like
anything else and I you know I I was
mentioning my nonprofit food fix you
know the woman who's working with us
there lost 112 pounds in the last few
years working with me without GLP1s you
know I've had literally probably dozens
and dozens and dozens of patients who've
lost 100 pounds or more without these
drugs and naturally keep their weight
off and regulate their appetite when
they understand how to use food as
medicine to regulate their hormones,
their peptides, their brain chemistry,
their microbiome, all of which regulate
our appetite and weight. So, there's
ways to do it. It's harder and some
people are stuck and I'm not opposed to
using these drugs, but we have to
understand they come with risk and they
they they have, you know, increased risk
of bowel obstruction, increased risk of
pancreatitis, increased risk of
potentially thyroid issues, of kidney
issues. And I think people need to if
they're monitoring their cells, fine.
You should get a DEXA scan before and
during and after. You should be checking
your kidney function test and your
amalayise and your lipase because it can
cause pancreatitis. You'll be checking
what happens to your other hormones and
to happens to your liver function tests
which can be affected by these drugs.
And the longer you take them, the more
the side effects are. So for example,
initially we're seeing very little data.
And then the data started coming in. And
for example, if you're on it for four
years, your risk of bowel obstruction
goes up by four and a half fold. That's
by
450%. Or your p risk of pancreatitis
goes up by
900%. That's that's you know it seems
like a lot. It is a lot but pancreatitis
is a more rare condition. So but it does
have an adverse impact and a lot of
people have nausea, vomiting, all kinds
of other side effects that are sort of
more mild, not as serious but but they
come with side effects. So I think can
they be used as part of an overall
strategy with nutrition counseling,
exercise counseling, and and integrating
lower doses and modifying the dosing
regimen? Yeah. But I don't think most
people need it if they understand how to
change their hormones and their brain
chemistry and their biology without
that. And that's the power of food is
medicine. And when I say food is
medicine, I'm not saying that as a sort
of a general, oh food can be healthy or
not healthy. I'm saying food literally
can be used as a drug and different
foods have different properties and
again you don't use the same drug for
every disease. You would prescribe
different diets for different problems
for such as for example if you look at
the the crisis in mental health in this
country. We have a severe mental health
crisis and and we've used uh ketogenic
diets and neurologic conditions like
epilepsy in medicine for decades. We now
know, for example, that ketogenic diets
can be very effective for schizophrenia,
for things like autism, for Alzheimer's,
for people with bipolar disease or
depression or anxiety. And and this has
to do with its effect of the metabolism
and and the way in which affects our
brain, our mitochondria. And and I wrote
a book about this ultra mind solution. I
say this, I wrote a book about
everything. I pretty much have. You've
written a lot of books. I've written
like 20 books. So it's like I'm
impressed. I'm you know, you're working
on one. Yeah.
I mean I mean it's it's uh it's uh big
enough to serve as a a workout for
lifting. No, it's not that thick, but it
doubles as a advice book and training
training. It's got a it's got a lot in
there. It's got a lot. But um you have
an impressive catalog of of really
terrific books. Uh but the Mayo Clinic
just got funded over $3 million to do
research on the role of ketogenic diets
and serious mental illness. You
mentioned Stanford has a department of
metabolic psychiatry. At Harvard, they
have a similar department of nutritional
psychiatry. What about other diets? So,
ketogenic, a lot of people um think of
that as high protein. It's really more
high fat, moderate protein, very low
starch, right? Um what about for um
cancer and cancer avoidance? Again, you
know, when you look at the data, cancer
rates are going up and it's because our
metabolic crisis is going up and many
cancers are obesity related. colon
cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic
cancer, many, many prostate cancer, and
they're driven by insulin resistance.
And we know the cancer has a metabolic
capacity to only burn carbs that can't
burn fat. So, if you stop carbs and you
eat fat, you can often change the
trajectory of cancer. Is that true for
all cancers? Are there any cancers that
react negatively to Yeah, I I don't
think that's true for all cancer. For
certain lymphomas, I probably don't
think it is, but Sedartha Mukerji, I
don't know if you've had him on the
podcast, but he's an incredible giant in
the field of medicine. brilliant
scientist at Colombia who's actually a
oncologist who wrote a book called The
Emperor Balm Malades and he wrote that
book. Yeah, he wrote that book. He wrote
the cell. He wrote That was a book about
cancer. Yeah. He wrote a book called The
Gene, the Cell and that and and he talks
about his research on ketogenic diets
for reversing stage four melanoma, stage
four pancreatic cancer. Very impressive
stuff. Yeah. You probably could like a
connection. Well, I remember the emperor
of all maladies. I I um I read that and
I read the eighth day creation in the
same roughly the same time period. both
super impressive books. I didn't realize
he was involved in a ketogenic diet.
Yeah. But there's a whole metabolic
theory of cancer. So I think that's
that's key. And certain cancers like
brain cancer responds incredibly well.
If you have a glyobblastoma, which
there's really no treatment for, it can
be very effective. Yeah. I'll tell you,
having lost some friends to cancer,
pancreatic cancer and glyobblasto are
the two I I mean I want any cancer, but
those are the two I really don't want to
get. These are all super important
topics. It seems to come back over and
over again to these pillars of health.
Food, circadian rhythm, meaning sleep
wake cycles. Obviously, um the last 50
years in this country were characterized
by like smoke less or don't smoke. Um we
now know alcohol is problematic for
cancers and other things. Not to say
that one can't enjoy a um drink every
once in a while, but you know, I I I
don't personally drink, but I I don't
have a propensity for alcohol either.
So, it's easy for me to say. I've had to
become a little bit softer on my stance
on this because I think like if you told
me that caffeine was bad, I'd tell you
I'm drinking it. I'd say, "How long do I
have?" Yeah. It's like Martin Buffett
says, "I don't care if I eat the
Makes me live a couple years less. I'm
still going to do it." Right. So, you
know, some people like a drink now and
can and I'm I sure I always say do do as
you do as you want, but know what you're
doing. Um, but I'd like to talk a little
bit about markers that are an outgrowth
of this conversation about food. So,
blood markers. So, APOB is one that gets
a lot of attention nowadays. For years,
all we heard was you want your HDL high,
you want your LDL low. Um, now we also
realize that elevated APOB can be
problematic. Yeah. And I and many people
I know who eat some meat, it's not meat
heavy diet, but some good quality meat.
We're not talking about deli meats and
things like that. Um, fruit, vegetables,
and
limit starchy carbohydrate intake to
some extent, maybe not completely, but
to some extent have observed elevated
APOB when we do that, including olive
oil, butter, coffee, yerba mate, this
kind of thing. a healthy diet, um,
largely anti-inflammatory diet, noticed
elevated APOB as compared to when some
of that red meat, even if it's grass-fed
meat, is replaced with things like fish
or chicken and so on, which makes me
wonder if there really is a red meat,
again, quality red meat, apo link. Yeah.
And should I worry if my apo is
elevated? My apo is a little bit
elevated, but I haven't yet gone on any
prescription drug to lower it. I'm
taking some other approaches. Yeah, it's
a great question and I learned that from
function and yes, they're a sponsor of
this podcast, but I hadn't had an APO
test and that was the problem. I go to
the doctor, I get a blood panel and it
didn't include AP. No, you get like your
19 tests and they the same old stuff and
you get your regular cholesterol like
height, weight, you know. I mean the
regular cholesterol panel is what most
doctors use to manage cardiovascular
risk which is your total your LDL HDL
and triglyceride levels that's just like
so 20th century the way we look at
cardiovascular risk now is way more
complicated and we need to look at the
quality of the cholesterol which is the
particle size and number and we were
talking earlier about sugar and starch
insulin resistance. Insulin resistance
is essentially a metabolic state where
your body can't respond like it normally
should to insulin and you need more and
more insulin to keep your blood sugar
normal. That has secondary consequences
which causes your cholesterol to become
abnormal. So it may not raise your LDL
per se, but it'll lower your good
cholesterol trigly or HDL which there's
good and bad HDL. It's a little more
complicated than that, but it'll raise
your
triglycerides and it will raise your apo
B. It'll raise your particle number of
of LDL particles and it'll make the size
of those particles small. These are all
things that people should be testing. Do
all these biomarkers including Apo B.
But Apo B if all you can get is an Apo B
from your doctor. Even the American
Heart Association recognizes this as a
better predictor of your risk of having
a heart attack than your LDL
cholesterol. And yet they're trying to
include soda. Sorry, I had to go back.
And the way I think about the way I
think about Apo because there there's
really cool tests now. You can use
massspec to look at C peptide and
insulin and look at your insulin
resistance, which is really cool. But if
you can't get that, you can ask your
doctor for an APO because it's it's a
sort of a surrogate marker for every
non-good type of cholesterol particle.
So what do you advise somebody if
they're if their APO is 90 or above?
Yeah. So you can test yourself.
Everybody's in one. So the next thing I
was going to say was that we treat all
lipids as sort of a uniform approach
which is everybody should drive their
LDL over 70 that under 70 that's what
cardiovascular uh recommendations are
exercise nutrition can be diet can be
exercise can be drugs do you are you a
fan of statins? Uh not a big fan but
they're a tool like am I like am I a fan
of like hammers? Well yeah when I need
one you know like but but not for
everybody. And I I think the key thing
to understand is that if you're looking
at your cardiovascular risk, you have to
look at the quality of these cholesterol
particles. And there's also a large
amount of variation or heterogenity in
the population in the response to the
exact same food. And I'll just tell you
a quick story. I had a one patient. She
was overweight, couldn't lose weight,
pre-diabetic, inflamed, and she was
really struggling. And I said, "Well,
look, you know, let's try a ketogenic
diet. There's good data on it. Let's see
what happens." Her cholesterol dropped
100 points. Her triglycerides dropped
200 points. Her HDL went up 30 points.
She lost 20 pounds. She felt great. Her
inflammation levels normalized. She did
great. Another guy heard about a
ketogenic diet who was in his 50s. One
of my patients, elite athlete, was like
riding his bike 50 miles a day. He was
in his mid-50s, super fit, thin, lean.
He He said, "I want to try it. I heard
it's good for performance." I'm like,
"Okay, but let's monitor your numbers."
And we did. And the opposite happened.
He his uh total cholesterol went through
the roof. His LDL went through the roof.
His particle number went up through the
roof. I'm like, "Wow." Same diet,
different response. And I've talked to
Ron Krauss about this. He's from
Oakland. You might know about him. He
discovered the particle size concept. He
basically used MRI machines and now he's
got a different technology which
measures the quality and the the number
of your cholesterol particles not just
the weight of them which is what you get
with a regular test. And and so we saw
this variation and we realize now in the
population it depends on who you are. So
there's a whole category of people
called lean mass hyperresponders. you're
maybe one of those where you're fit,
you're healthy, you're athletic and you
eat saturated fat and boom, you know,
your numbers kind of go wacky or you
could be an overweight diabetic person
and they do the opposite like you'll
lower your LDL like this woman. So, it
depends on your metabolic type, on your
level of insulin resistance, on your
overall health and people can switch
over. So, let's say you're an overweight
diabetic and you become ripped and
healthy and fit, then the same food
might have an opposite effect on you at
that point. And it all has to do with
cholesterol transport, cholesterol
synthesis in the liver. It's kind of a
little complicated scientifically. I
know you might have a guy named Nick
Norwitz from Harvard on the podcast
who's great. Who's he can talk about
this all day long. Nick has great online
content. Folks should check out Nick
Noritz's uh ex Instagram handle. Very
smart kid. Very smart kid. Very
spirited. I've encouraged him from from
the first time I saw his content to keep
going. He's great. Yeah, he's like he's
a Oxford PhD in metabolism. He's got
Harvard MD. He's graduating medical
school this year. not afraid to go
against the grain. He just goes with his
experience and the data. Yeah. You're
explaining about about different diets
for people. He had colitis and almost
died. He went on on a carnivore/ keto
diet and actually ended up curing it and
is fit and healthy now. Right. And and
but his cholesterol, his LDL went up to
500. Is that where it sits now? Yeah.
And and so there's a whole group of
these people that have LDLs that are
through the roof. It would make most
cardiologists have a heart attack just
looking at the number. So what do we do?
Let's say someone takes a apo test
function or from their doctor and and
they've got an APO that's like 110. What
do you do? Well, the NIH basically is
great. They now said that the N of one
research is among the highest quality
research and that what that means is you
compared to you, right? I don't want to
compare myself to a 70 kilogram white
male from Kansas or some, you know, a 5
foot tall woman from like, you know, I
don't know, like Afghanistan. Like we're
all different. And so we we need to see
what happens to our biology. That's why
I believe test don't guess and do
something follow it up and track it. You
know how often depends on what you're
doing. Lipids change very quickly.
Typical typical person. Lipids can
change within a month. So I'd give
people a month of changing a diet or
changing a lifestyle or behavior to see
what happens. Vitamin D can take longer.
If you're low, it can take up to three
months to rebuild. If your iron is low,
it can take three months to rebuild your
iron. So it depends on the test. But but
you know you can quickly see changes in
your insulin resistance in your insulin
levels and your blood sugar levels in
your lipid levels by changing diet and
but you have to be systematic, right? I
mean yeah I mean I I had a patient who
was was I have a program called the
10day detox diet which essentially is a
whole foods diet which eliminates a lot
of the inflammatory foods that are
problematic for people and it creates an
incredible uh like quick response. Like
I I call it setting your body back to
its original factory settings. And she
was like, "I want to check my blood
after 10 days." I'm like, "No, it it's
going to be a waste of money. We
shouldn't do it. Your numbers aren't
going to change that much." But she
insisted and I was like, "Okay." And she
did. And the numbers just dramatically
change your lips, her insulin, her blood
sugar, inflammation levels. The body is
like a you change the inputs and the
outputs change dramatically. So I think
it's really about finding out what's
going on for you. So Andy, I say, "Well,
try to go off of meat and see what
happens to your AOB or try to add more
this kind of fat." I started eating more
tuna and eating a little bit less beef
and then I did a function test and I
discovered my mercury was elevated. By
the way, I learned something the hard
way also a few years prior to that,
which is I know this sounds crazy, but
check your dishwasher. Some of them have
mercury thermometers that are that are
leaky. Yeah. Now, I was told the mercury
from the mercury thermometers in
dishwashers is is biologically inert,
but I'll tell you, it's not pleasant to
see a bunch of little mercury beads
floating around in on on your dishes. I
mean, considering it's the most potent
toxin known to humans other than
plutonium, I would probably avoid all
forms of mercury. So, do you eat tuna?
Rarely. I love tuna sushi. Raleigh.
Okay. But I I I actually, you know, have
little hacks where you can take a
keelating drug after you go to a sushi
restaurant. Like what? What's it? DMSA.
It's FDA approved drug for heavy metal
keilation. Prescription. Prescription.
DMSA. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. What what
dosage? Uh, depends. You can do like 500
milligrams or you'll take that after you
go out to sushi. Yeah. I mean, that it's
kind of like a doctor hack I can do
where you can ask your doctor for it. I
don't I don't recommend it. It's like,
you know, well, as long as we're on
this, I Let's talk. I like I love the
range of topics we're touching into
today, by the way. By the way, I almost
died from mercury poisoning. So, I know
how to manage it, how my body works.
I've checked my genes and why I don't
detox. This was from the China. Yeah. I
know how to upregulate my detox pathways
through food, through supplements. Are
you a fan of sulforophane? When I did
the episode on microplastics and pases,
I started taking sulforophane and
increasing my cruciferous vegetable
intake. upregulates glutathione which is
the body's main detoxifying compound. So
do you also take um an acetylcyine? I
do. Yeah. Daily. Daily. Yeah. How much?
600. 600 mill. Okay. I'll do uh three or
four times that if I feel a cold coming
on, but I don't take it daily. I should
probably take it daily. Well,
considering we live in a toxic soup.
Yeah. I mean, we just can't get away
from it in the air, the food. An
acetylcysteine. We already talked about
the omegas and the basics, magnesium,
etc. Um what are some things that when
people start to hit their 40s, 50s, 60s,
um that you think they should add in for
their health? Um and is there anything
uh female specific or male specific? For
sure. I mean, you know what's really
frightening, Andrew, is that because of
the diet we have, which is hormonally
regulating sugar and starch tend to
screw up both men's and women's
hormones. It makes women more like men
and men more like women. So, you get
PCOS in women, which is hair growth on
your face, loss of hair on your head,
and and androgens androgen. Yeah. And
then for men, their testosterone goes
down. The bigger your belly, the lower
your testosterone. So when you start
your sugar, you get belly fat. So I
mean, young young men have low
testosterone. I I would have I would
have said if you asked me 20 years ago,
I said, well, you know, you start
checking in your 40s and seeing the
changes that happen, but now I think we
got to start looking earlier. And a lot
of guys are get are getting on TRT
young. I I'm on a bit of a campaign now
to discourage that. I think that if
they're doing everything right, like
eating right and exercising, and that
doesn't mean overex exercising. if you
overtrain, like if you're running
running, your testosterone is going to
be um going to be diminished for sure.
But encouraging them to do everything
they can with behaviors and include
nutrition and some supplementation
before getting on TRT because of the
reduction in sperm count um that comes
from TRT unless you offset it with hCG.
Yeah. So, you know, I I I've said before
in the podcast, I I take 25 milligrams
of cipionate every other day, staggered
with hCG, 600 IU every other day. I had
been open about that for from the
beginning at but I started at age 45.
Yeah. And I do freeze sperm every year.
Um just because there's some age related
effects on sperm and like why not? It's
very inexpensive to crowd preserve. But
I think young guys are are um it's scary
that their testosterone is so low. Yeah.
Especially if they're not overweight. So
what's going on? Well, also there's
endocrine disrupting chemicals. So her
heavy metals, pesticides, a lot of these
are what we call xenobiotics. Mh.
meaning they're foreign kind of
compounds that are biologically active.
And there's a whole book on this that I
read like almost 30 years ago called Our
Stolen Future by Theo Coburn which lays
out it was kind of like the Rachel
Carson silent spring version of a few
years ago which talked about the
reproductive effects of these
petrochemical toxins that are everywhere
in our food and our water and our air
and they affect fertility rates. they
affect birth rates in terms of Shauna
Swan is was on this podcast and gosh, if
it wasn't for her and her incredible
work and the fact that she's such a
skeptic of any data that I don't think
people would um respect the uh the data
on pesticides as much as they do because
I think it took somebody with her kind
of front-facing image to you know she
she's not like she talks a lot about the
environmental working group and the real
hardcore science types are like oh they
They're anti-environmental working
group. I was shocked to learn that a lot
of people in the scientific community
are like anti-environmental working
group. I thought, how could that
possibly be? They call it woo science. I
mean, the politics and all this are
really complicated. But, um, what do you
do to remove heavy metals? Just to
answer your question about what you
should be testing. I think most people
should be testing, you know, depending
on where you are and what age you are,
but your hormonal panels on a regular
basis. So sex hormones uh male would be
free testosterone, total testosterone,
estradi, DHT as well, DHEA, DHT.
Sometimes we have hair loss that can be
treated for men. For women, same thing.
They need you know FSH, LH, uh sex
hormones like estradiol, progesterone,
testosterone for women as well, DHA
sulfate, which can be indicator of PCOS.
And we seeing with our function because
we've had 150,000 members now. We have
literally tens 150,000,000. We have tens
of millions of biological data points
and we can see anonymized data showing
the trends in the population and it's
not good and and then the good news is
you can do something about it. Can
insurance cover a blood test like
function? Yes. If you get your health
savings account or your FSAs, you can
use those for function health testing.
But you you if you don't have that and
you can't use that, regular insurance
doesn't cover it yet. I'm hoping we're
going to change. Yeah. Is that in the is
that in the cards? That's in the road
map for sure. Um because once we can
prove that we create value and we're
seeing this when people use function,
they get their lab test done and then we
follow them for you know every six
months and we can see the changes in the
biomarkers toward the positive. How many
people go from abnormal to normal and
it's not just by knowing their tests and
there's tens of thousands of pages of
content that have been highly curated
and scientifically referenced on what to
do if you have this or that normal
biomarker. So you ask me yeah what do I
do for mercury? Yeah. If you get a
positive mercury and you double clicked
on that, you would get a very deep
analysis of what you need to do. Here's
the way to reduce your exposures through
your water and air. Here's how you
reduce your exposure through food by
reducing these kinds of fish, eating
more of these kinds of fish. Are you a
fan of using charcoal as a chilator? I
don't think charcoal is great for heavy
metals. No, I think I think it's good
for binding anything. So, we use How do
you How does one take charcoal? I've
been a little bit cautious about taking
charcoals. When I was in the ER, though,
we used to use it if people came with a
drug overdose. We'd make him drink a cup
of charcoal. Literally, their teeth
would turn black. It was awful. So, if I
you try to kill yourself, then it's
punishment for trying to kill yourself.
Um, this is gallows humor that only a
physician could could could laugh at
this. I know enough physicians and they
all have this gallows humor. I think
it's a survival tactic. You have to you
have to because you're like in
situations, but you're maybe you
otherwise go crazy. Let's say I want to
um remove some heavy metals and toxins
from the body. I could take a charcoal
tablet. No, you can take a tablet, but I
wouldn't do that. What I would say is
one, reduce your exposure number one. If
you're eating tuna, big fish, you know,
it's basically the bigger the fish, the
more the mercury. I don't eat much tuna
anymore. Yeah. So, so small fish, s I
call it the smashers. While small wild
salmon, mackerel, anchovies, sardines,
and Harry fish, all
your but is there anything I can take?
So, here's what I would do. I would I
would, you know, there there are there's
a and I don't have any relationship with
this company. It's called Ctopia.fish
fish. It sources fish around the world
from regeneratively Yeah, I've seen
their stuff regenerative fish farms. So,
it's farmed, but it's healthy and it
doesn't have all the heavy metals and
you can get good fish. Uh there are some
small tuna farms that are like smaller
tunas where they actually do this too.
Um but they don't source from there.
Second is I would I would upregulate all
of your indogenous detox pathways. So
this your body has a system of
elimination and doctors say detox is
Baloney you poop, you pee, you
breathe, you sweat. Like this is your
your liver has a whole series of
pathways that are detoxification
pathways. Your kidney does, your gut
does. I mean this is what your body
does, right? Your poop, pee, sweat, you
know, all these things. So you have to
upregulate your body's own system. So
you need to take foods that upregulate
your liver. You mentioned eating more
cruciferous vegetables. You could add
more garlic. You could actually juice
cilantro is a great hack for getting rid
of heavy metals. Really? Yeah. It
doesn't taste very good. I like
cilantro. But juicing like a couple of
bunches of that every day will help
bring it down. Um and then there are uh
things like fiber to help bind it. So
you talked about charcoal, that's a
binder, but just f eating a higher fiber
diet will help you eliminate things
faster through your colon like heavy
metals. And do you believe in in gut
cleanses? There's this uh this I don't I
want to just talk about it. There's this
um fermented plum uh product someone
gave me. No, it it comes in a beautiful
packaging like this orange and black
packaging. It's a fermented plum or
pomelo that uh a friend of mine said,
"Listen, you have to stay home the next
day, but you take this before you go to
sleep. You drink a like, you know, 16
ounces of water. You go to sleep. You
wake up in the morning and you're not
going anywhere that day except a few
trips to the bathroom, but you it
completely empties your digestive tract.
I think you got a colonoscopy and get
that too through the prep. Yeah. So,
it's not something that I Well, I tried
it because I was like, "All right, I'll
give this a try." Is it healthy or
unhealthy or um neutral to do a complete
uh digestive tract uh I mean, I think
you you you it depends how you do it and
what's causing it like you know, but it
can it can disrupt your gut flora. So
you you your gut will really repopulate
often with the flora that it had. But
you know part of the reason we're so
sick is our gut flora is so harmed by
C-sections, antibiotics, lack of
breastfeeding. The infant formula itself
is a microbiome harmful compound for
many reasons. Not saying women shouldn't
use formula, but there's better formulas
and worse formulas. And and so we we've
kind of like had a lot of gut issues.
We've taken antibiotics. We've eaten
food that's harmful to our microbiome.
We exposed to toxins. somebody might
want to flush their system. I think it
can be helpful and and for example we do
this for example if people have uh liver
failure and you're an alcoholic and you
have liver failure now liver failure
comes mostly from eating sugar and
starch non it's they changed the name by
the way from non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease to metabolic associated fatty
liver disease which is just kind of tell
you and so those people if they come in
with liver failure they get crazy
literally it's called hpatic and
sephylopathy they get delirium they are
seeing things they literally go nuts.
The treatment, you give them a
sterilizing antibiotics. You kill
everything in their gut called neomy.
And then you give them laculose, which
makes you poop your brains out. And then
they they basically flush all that out.
And all the toxins that you can't
metabolize from your microbiome get
flushed out and you come back to normal
cognition. Wow. And it's a standard
medical treatment. It's like basically
what you learned in medical school. So
there there is an argument and I've done
this with autistic kids who've had gut
issues with certain different issues.
Parkinson's if you're constipated goes
up by your risk goes up by 400% and
that's a toxin related neurological
disease. Well this is this thing is a
hammer. It was sort of given to me as a
joke and I thought all right well this
is going to be no you're going to be
fine. Don't worry. Yeah. No, I only did
I only did it uh twice um on separate
occasions and I was like, "Okay, that
wasn't um super pleasant, but um I just
wanted to know is it a valuable tool?"
And I wasn't interested in taking a drug
and it's like this fermented fruit or
something like that. I I did hear that
um from a colleague at Yale who studies
the microbiome that if we fast or if we
evacuate our digestive tract in kind of
an aggressive way like that that the
healthy microbiome needs some time to
replenish itself. It's not like you like
when you fast you start eating away at
the unhealthy and healthy microbiota.
They or they they aren't fed, right? And
so it's not not across the board a good
thing necessarily. Yeah. So you want to
be careful of that. But I I mean I think
um in terms of answering your question
about metals. So you you want to
upregulate you reduce your exposure. You
want to upregulate your pathways by food
and then you can upregulate the pathways
by nutrients. So we talked about an
acetylcysteine. So anything that boosts
glutathione lipoic acid all the
methylating B vitamins B12, folate, B6,
making sure you have enough protein
because a lot of the phase 2 pathways in
your liver that help you detoxify are
dependent on amino acids like
gluconation and glutathione. It's it's a
an important detoxifying compound and
you want to you want to basically open
up all the pathways to get rid of. So I
have a very specific detox protocol for
heavy metals includes all that and
sometimes DMSA and binders but I I use
silica. I use algenates from seaweed and
others. I don't use charcoal for that.
But you can safely remove metals from
your body. That's what happened to me. I
I was able to do it and I you know I'm
not demented anymore and I don't have
like chronic fatigue syndrome. And if
you looked at pictures of me in my 30s
you're like wow you look terrible. Well,
I met you 10 years ago. Yeah.
And you truly have aged backwards and
you looked great then. You look super
vibrant then. Like you have a ton of
energy. I mean, I think you you embody a
lot of the things that people would like
for healthy aging. And I I know you also
exercise and you you do all the things.
Um I'd like to talk about some of the
kind of more um cutting edge things that
are happening that I've not tried but
that I'm curious about. Um and you want
to know if I've done them or not? Well,
or maybe or just what I've tried
everything pretty much. Let's let's
actually um something I have tried but
that I'm not an expert on but we've done
a couple of podcasts about but I'd like
your thoughts on peptides. Yeah. What
are some of the peptides that you think
can be useful to people if they can
afford them and work with a doctor where
they can get it safely? Let's just
assume all that. Um what are the
peptides that you think are of of real
value to to people who aren't like
really sick but are doing everything
they can? Optimization. Yeah.
optimization and just yeah generally
trying to point all the boats in the
direction of health and it depends on
what your needs are what's happening
with your health and like anything
you're using it should be used for a
purpose right and and peptides are
simply many proteins uh that have
biological effects and I think of them
as this the your body's super highway of
information and connectivity that drives
everything so they regulate your sex
hormones your growth hormone your
metabolic health nerve function I sexual
desire. I mean there's million peptides
like GLP-1 is a peptide. Insulin is a
peptide, right? So there's tens of
thousands of peptides that are made by
the body that are used to regulate
everything. And so there's a number of
them that have been available that have
been studied well. Some of them are on
the market like you know ompic or
insulin or by ly which is something
called PT41
for hyposexual hyposexual women. Yeah.
For women but you use it for men. It
works for but it's FDA approved for
women. It's FDA approved for women. It
works for men, too. Is it kissepin? Is
that what No, it's not kissepin. It's a
I'm going to butcher the name. It's like
starts with a blem tide or something
like that. Okay. And and you know it it
does make you nauseous. So, you need to
take a be careful. You want to you don't
want to throw up while you're having
sex, but definitely not not too sexy,
but uh it does work. Um but there's a
number of depending on your needs. For
example, if you're athletic and you're,
you know, in the gym a lot, you want to
increase recovery and repair, there's
peptides like BPC 157 and TB500 and uh
GHK that are regulatory peptides for
tissue repair and healing. There are
peptides that you can use for immune
function like thyos and alpha 1, which
is great if you're getting a cold or you
have an immune issue or you have COVID
or what's the pathway for thymus and b
alpha thymus and alpha? Um I we don't
have to go through every biochemical
step, but is the logic there that you're
increasing the number number excuse me
of T- cells and B cells? Yeah. So
basically you you know when you're born
you have a giant thymus gland which like
takes up your whole chest and as Yeah.
If you look if you look at a baby just
you take a Google image and put up there
it's like basically like your whole
sternum. It's like this big, but it
involutes or shrinks as you get older
and it kind of becomes smaller, but it's
still a source of your immune function
and it helps with building your immune
resilience and it and as we age, it gets
worse and worse. And so the thyus one
does increase your your white blood cell
function and and number and it helps
improve that. Um, then there's peptides
that are like a great like PT41 for
sexual function. There's peptides like
that increases testosterone. There's
ones like epomorlin that intestine that
may help growth hormone. Do you do you
take it? Um you don't have to share what
you take, but do you um think any of
these are kind of mainstays for people
over 40 if they can afford them? Some of
them I think, but you have to be careful
because they're they're they're not like
just taking a vitamin. I mean, if you
take an overdose of vitamin D, yeah,
you'll get in trouble. Or if you have
other fats soluble vitamins like vitamin
A, you get in trouble. Most water
soluble vitamins, you're not going to
get in trouble. Although B6, you have to
be careful with an overdose. That and
magnesium, if you take too much of it,
you just poop your brains out.
and vitamin C the same thing so your
body can manage but peptides are very
powerful compounds I mean look at ompic
I mean look at insulin I mean these are
very powerful compounds not to be messed
around with no so you really need
someone who's educated and it well and
they should be usually a doctor or some
licensed professional who has studied
and understands this and they should be
used with monitoring to the side effects
the effects effects on your lab work and
hormones what about cycling them yeah so
so you don't want to ne always take them
all the time and you want to do cycle
them particularly ones stimulate things
like growth hormone. You don't want to
be on that all the time. I worry about
BPC57 because in my experience it is
effective at treating uh minor injuries
and things like that, but people now
just take it continuously and it
increases angioenesis
um growth of capillaries and vessels and
things like that. And if you have a
tumor, you do not want to increase
angioenesis to the tumor. Exactly. You
just wouldn't know if that was
happening. There's no way to know until
that tumor, you know, starts creating
problems, right? Although that that's
another thing cancer screening are is so
antiquated right we do such poor jobs of
cancer screening with you know a
colonoscopy pap test what's a better
cancer screen there's a new technology
that was been developed using fragments
of DNA
uh that are released into the
bloodstream from cancers way before it
ever shows up on a scan or an imaging
which you can pick up cancers a year two
or three before they ever show up on any
kind of test and it's called Gallery. It
screens uh 50 of the most common
cancers, many of which there's no
screening test for. And uh it the false
positive rate, which is what you worry
about, is very low, like half a percent.
That means it shows you have a cancer
when you actually don't, which can be
very terrifying. It it's about 75%
accurate and finding the cancer if early
if you find it. And it's great. I mean,
we we've picked up so many people with
issues. One in 1888 of our members
who've tested with this test have a
cancer that they wouldn't have known
about otherwise and they can catch an
early stage before it it kills you. The
push back on this early detection was
surprising to me. Not this one in
particular, but like a few years ago I
paid for a penovo scan. Yeah. Yeah. Then
I started seeing some of the push back
on whole body MRIs um from people in the
standard medical community. So I asked
my good friend at neurosurgery at UCSF,
Eddie Chang. I said, "Hey, what do you
think of these whole body scans?" And he
said, "I get people coming in all the
time who have identified brain tumors
and aneurysms and issues that they were
completely unaware of that they would
probably be dead in the next 5 to 10
years." And by the way, I don't get paid
by Prouvo. I I don't have any deal with
Prouvo or any other of these whole body
imaging things. And I realize there's a
cost. So, I think the implication is
from the people that give push back
like, "Oh, these things are expensive
and we and we're going to kind of push
back on them as a tool because we don't
want people to feel badly if they can't
get them. We want we don't want to um
they're going to become commoditized.
They're going to become cheap just like
we're able to get like $15,000 test for
$4.99. We're going to be able to get a
whole body scan for 300 bucks. It's
happening. It's not it doesn't have to
be 3,000 bucks." So that's coming and I
think we're going to lean into that in
function in the future. But it's really
uh it's really important to understand
that you want data on your body as much
as you can have and as much as you can
afford and the healthare system should
pay for it. They don't because they
don't they don't understand the value of
this because they they don't see the
benefit as they people transfer
insurance companies so regularly and
jobs so regularly that they figure oh if
I invest in somebody's health then the
next guy's going to get the benefit. You
know if I'm United then Etna will get
the benefit or signal will get the
benefit. I see. You know, it's kind of
like a it's it's a perverse incentive
system, but I I I think, you know,
datadriven healthare is the future
really. Imagine imagine a place where
you can have all your personal health
data. And this is where we're going.
where you can have all your biomarker
testing, where you can have all your
wearable data, your full genome, your
microbiome, all imaging data, not just a
whole body scan, but looking at your
body composition, looking at AI heart
scans that tell how much plaque you have
and and and much more with your medical
history with all the world scientific
literature informing it with knowledge
experts also overlaying their knowledge
and expertise onto it in a platform that
allows you to query it. So, think about
like an AI chatbot that's just based on
you. Like it's your data. And what what
now in medicine is so amazing is we try
to like make diagnoses and understand
what's going on with people with such
limited data sets about them about them.
They're so antiquated. And so you've got
guys like Lee Hood who's literally
measuring thousands and thousands of
data points on patients and he's using
his project called the phenome project.
I think it's called phenome health where
he's he's been able to say, "Oh, geez, I
can detect this from a few molecules in
the blood. I can see what's going on
with your microbiome or a few molecules
in your blood. I can see if you're going
to be at risk for Alzheimer's." And now
we offer this for for you think there
was no test for Alzheimer's, right? You
had to do a brain biopsy or you had to
wait till you got, you know, you forget
your, you know, name of this or that or
the other thing. And now we can through
blood testing look for things like PTA
217 and amaloid 4240 made amaloid 4240
ratios. What can you do in response to
that? Let's say somebody That's a good
question. That's a good question. I mean
Alzheimer's is a tough one. I've
followed this this field for a long
time. I had people working in the bench
right across from me as a postto. There
were there have been so many hypotheses.
Not just the plaques and tangles thing.
Um not just the beta amaloid hypothesis.
But I I'll tell you, my friends who are
neurologists are not optimistic. They're
not, but they're not looking at the
problem the right way, right? It's it's
sort of like the blind man and the
elephant. They're looking at their one
thing and they don't see an answer. But
you guys guys like Richard Isacson who
was at Cornell and now he's in Florida,
who who if you haven't had on your
podcast, you should. who was a who's a
neurologist studying Alzheimer's and
looking at deep diagnostics and
personalized approaches to address the
root causes and seeing remarkable
outcome reversals. He had a special on
uh was I think CNN with Sanjay Gupta
where they looked literally showed that
you can take these biomarkers and if you
find them early enough you can intervene
and again I've done this with dozens of
patients who had dementia who were able
to stop or reverse it. I have more with
diet not just diet it's everything. So
Alzheimer's is is like it's like saying
um it's like just saying you can't
remember stuff like you know we have all
these fancy names we give to diseases
and then we say oh I know why you can't
remember things you have Alzheimer's no
Alzheimer's is the name we give to
people who can't remember things it's a
certain specific type of problem but
then the question is what causes it and
there are multiple causes it's called
type two diabetes of the type three
diabetes of the brain or it's caused by
insulin resistance we know diabetics
have four times the rate of Alzheimer's
could be caused by environmental tox
toxins like heavy metals. It could be
caused by mold or it could be caused by
Lyme disease like Chris Kristofferson
had or it could be caused by changes in
the microbiome or by nutritional
deficiencies. I had one woman who was
like diagnosed with early dementia and
she had she was older, brilliant woman
but was starting to lose it. Turned out
she had severe methylation issues and B
vitamin deficiency and folate deficiency
and I treated her with a vitamin B12
shot and some B vitamins and she came
right back. So it's a multi again
multicausal multimodal treatments. You
got to figure out all the causes and you
got to treat all the problems. If
someone has mercury issues and mold
issues and they have Lyme disease and
they have gut issues and they have
pre-diabetes and they have methylation
issues, you got to treat all those
things and then you can see real change
in people's biomarkers. Ketogenic diets
have been affected. But it's not like a
keto diet will fix everybody with
Alzheimer's or that keation will fix
everybody with Alzheimer or that fixing
their diabetes will fix everybody with
Alzheimer's. You have to find all the
things and treat all the things. Like if
your roof have has 30 holes in it and
you plug 25 of them and it rains, it's
still going to get wet in your house,
you know, and that's the opposite of how
medicine's practiced. And I I ran into
this at Cleveland Clinic and we were
trying to study Alzheimer's and we had a
guy who really wanted to look at the
black box of functional medicine. People
come in, you do personalized care out
the other side, what happens? And the
the head of science there was like, "No,
no, we can't do that. We can only study
one thing at a time. Vitamin D, we'll do
that study, then we'll do fish oil
study, then we'll do diet study, then
we'll do exercise study, then we'll do
whatever study." I'm like, "That's not
how the body works. You need, you know,
if you want to grow a plant, you can't
just say, I'm just going to give it
water and soil but no uh light or I'm
going to give it light but no soil or,
you know, like it just doesn't make
sense." So, the whole context, yeah,
functional medicine is really about
understanding this model and how do you
apply it in a personalized way and
Richard Isaac has done it. Dale
Bredesen's done it and their their
results are amazing. And I and I
personally have seen this in in my
patients where they either stop
progressing or they reverse it. Now,
sometimes they do progress and it's
hard, but I've had patients who've done
incredible for years and years and
years. Well, about a year ago, somebody
who's probably one of the finest
cardiologists in North America contacted
me of all people and asked, "What do I
know about ketogenic diet for the
treatment of Alzheimer's?" And I said,
"Well, this I've known him since I was a
kid." because he's a family friend, a
phenomenal cardiologist. And I said, um,
you know, this is an odd moment because
I remember years ago I said I was going
to go into neuroscience and he said,
"Why would you go into neuroscience?
Like there's nothing to like
neuroscience is a ridiculous field. Why
would you do that?" Uh, the joke the
joke about neurologists is you diagnose
an adios like there's nothing to do. You
could diagnosing problems, but you can't
do anything about it. So, exactly to
that point. So um but he was very
curious because his father had
Alzheimer's and um he was exploring the
ketogenic diet for the treatment of
Alzheimer's for his dad and he was
observing some really impressive
results. So here's a a cardiologist
among the best asking me what I've seen
about this and I said well I know of
Dale Bredesen's work and um and I'm I'm
learning as I go and we will cover this
on the podcast. This is very
informative. Um I want to make sure that
we hit the other kind of cutting edge
things. I'm curious if you take anything
to augment NAD. I take sublingual NMN
every day. I don't get paid by a company
that makes NMN. I take it. The most
noticeable effects that I've observed
are increased energy. My hair grows
super fast when I take NAD and my nails
grow super fast. Those are not effects I
was trying to achieve, but that's what
what what I've observed. Do you take NN
NR or do you do NAD infusions? Yeah, I
do. And why? I think you know when you
look at the data and I I wrote a book
called Young Forever I talk about
longevity and the pathways and when you
look at the fundamental regulatory
systems in the body around cellular
repair healing renewal
regeneration we have a built-in healing
system like everybody understands that
if you cut your skin you don't go oh
would you please heal and please recruit
these you know stem cells and read this
andis factors and bring cytoines over
here to do that your body knows what to
do same you break a bone it's like got
an it's got a its own healing system. So
in the body there's I call these
longevity switches and but they regulate
not just what longevity but they
regulate chronic disease and and much
more and they're embedded ancient
pathways that exist from worms to humans
uh mTor MPK sertuins and insulin
signaling pathways and and NAD in the
body works to activate one of those
longevity switches called certuins which
are involved in DNA repair. So when you
get a 100,000 hits a day to your DNA as
it's unraveling and rerolling and it's
kind of gets damaged, you need an army
to go out and like you fix it, right? A
bunch of carpenters kind like repair
that broken DNA. NAD stimulates that. It
also stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis
forming new mitochondria, improves
mitochondrial function, improves insulin
sensitivity, improves mTor uh autoph
induced autophagy. So it there are a lot
of redundancies in these pathways, but
it's really quite amazing when you see
how the body's organized. And so NAD is
one of the things it's not going to make
you live forever or cure every disease,
but it's a it's an it's an optimization
tool because as you get older, NAD
levels decline, and so your mitochondria
decline, your energy declines, and it's
it's great for all of that. So I take
it, and I I I think How do you get NAD?
I get I get a thousand I get 1,000
milligrams of NMN. Okay. So you take
that daily? Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Yeah, I do
the sublingual in a man and occasionally
I'll get an NAD infusion, but it's so
unpleasant as it goes in. It's like
you're getting stomped on by an
elephant.
Slowly slowly, but you do feel great
afterwards. Um,
exoomes. Yeah. Have you had them? I've
had them. I've given them. What are they
and why would you get them? So again,
the body has this amazing healing system
and it's part of the body's healing
system. And this whole deal you're
talking about, whether it's peptides,
whether it's exoomes, there's NM, it's
part of this field of regenerative
medicine. How do we regenerate and heal
and repair by activating our body's own
built-in systems which are way better
and way stronger and work way faster
than most medications if you know how to
use them. So exoomes are essentially the
little packets of healing information
that are inside stem cells and there's
thousands of them and and they get
released. Think of like little kind of
like you know when you blow bubbles when
you're a kid. It's like these little
bubbles of stuff that go out into the
body and then they go to where they're
needed and they release the packets of
information that contain growth factors,
healing factors, anti-inflammatory
factors, tissue repair factors. Uh and
that's how the body tends to repair and
heal. And so uh I remember once uh I had
CO really bad and I afterwards I I've
never really felt depressed. I mean I've
been sad obviously in my life and lost
parents and had things happen. There
were you know life issues but I felt
physiologically depressed like my brain
felt terrible. I couldn't think. That's
how I felt with cognitive issues. I was
like I'm an idiot and I'm depressed and
I want to kill myself and my higher self
is like this is not me. like and I I
took a load of exosomes IV. I just got
them because I'm a doctor. I can get
them and I gave them to myself and
literally within hours I was
resurrected. It was it was amazing.
Yeah. And I've used it for my knee. I
have a miniscus injury. I've used them
in my knee. I've used them in my back.
So I think they can be very effective. I
used them introvenously for Is it done
in the United States? You can you can
give extra something. So it's FDA
approved. Yeah. But uh you know uh
they're approved for skin issues or this
thing. So there's like an off label uses
what they what they use them for. Uh a
lot of things like stem cells you have
to go out of the country to do it and
there's a regulatory issues or safety
issues. I'm still scared to do stem
cells. I understand. I mean it's it's
you want to not play with this stuff but
you also you know can be they can be
used effectively. Like my wife for
example was a runner and she kind of
tore her knees up and had
patellofhemeral syndrome and couldn't
walk. And I mean she's younger than I am
and she she shouldn't be feeling that
like she's 80 years old in her knees. We
went to Costa Rica to a very reputable
center and I knew the, you know, the
founders of it. I inspected the
laboratory. I went with the scientists
who, you know, harvested them, who grew
them, what they did, their testing
practice. I did my homework and she
ended up having no knee problems after
she got her stem cells in her knees. And
I was like, that's amazing. And this is
like, you know, probably close to two
years later. That's awesome. I mean,
I've heard great things from many
people. I I haven't felt a need to do
stem cells, so that's why I haven't done
it. But I'm curious about exoomes and
been um you know cautiously exploring
the peptide space. We talked about some
other supplements. Look, Mark, we've
covered a ton. Uh it was a whirlwind and
um and at the same ADD I'm like we No,
no. At at the same time, I mean, we
talked about food as medicine. Yeah.
Talked about core supplements that
people really should perhaps not even
think about as supplements anymore, but
that's sort of up to the that's in the
the ear of the beholder. My joke on that
is this. I said, "People say, "Do you
need supplements?" I'm like, "No, you
don't need supplements, but only under
certain conditions. You drink pure clean
water. You breathe pure clean air. You
wake up with the sun. You go to bed with
the sun. You have no chronic stress.
You're exposed to no environmental
toxins. And you're only hunting and
gathering your own wild food. If that's
you, you don't need any supplements and
it's the 1930s, right? So, yeah, things
like D3, omegas. I like that answer.
magnesium, selenium, iodine, a case you
made a case for table salt in addition
to all the fancy salts that we all enjoy
or just having seaweed and fish, you
know, seaweed and fish, but not tuna.
Um, and thank you for touching on uh air
and uh lack of cleanliness and air uh
heavy metal poisoning. Um things to be
cautious about there is ways to detox
and and for uh illustrating that that
detoxification is possible through known
pathways that anti-aging, longevity,
whatever you want to call it, and bodily
repair pathways are inherent in us. And
so we're we're it can encourage them.
Um, and I also really want to thank you
for being willing to wade into the
swamp, the swamp that is the uh public
health debate right now, but especially
the corner of the swamp that is um, for
lack of a better way to put it, the big
food relationship and what you and Bobby
Kennedy and others. I hope that they
will recruit from from the left. I know
Cy Booker's been actively involved in
this. He's on the he's on the left
clearly. um and trying to clean up the
food supply, give people options. What I
heard is that it's not about forcing
things, but it's about giving people
options and knowledge, transparency,
education. So, like I I really
appreciate you and the entire population
of people that care about their health,
whether they realize it or not, they
appreciate you because you're a real
pioneer in this field and you've touched
some really challenging waters. And I
happen to know and I feel very good
saying that it is your uh inherent good
nature. I think that's allowed you to go
through one swamp after another after
the other with your like optimism and
your your kindness of spirit intact. So,
you know, thanks. You're a real role
model to everyone who cares about their
health and who's trying to help others
care about their health. Yeah, I'm a
pathological optimist. But the good news
is optimists live longer, even if
they're wrong. Well, I was thinking
about this the other day. I met your new
dog. And forgive me for saying this, but
but Lenny's got a great attitude. You
know what my first thought was? He's
kind of like Mark. He like came in
there. He crawled up on my lap. Although
you didn't crawl up on my lap. I just
want to make the point that he he has no
stranger danger. He was very but but
he's a he's a really wonderful and
beautiful dog by the way. He's a
impressive dog. Um and you just have
that good nature about you. And I know
you want the best for people. I just
don't like people suffering when they
don't need to. I feel like I'm I'm have
a glass of water. They're thirsty and
there's a giant glass wall between us.
And that's why I've been working my
whole life to kind of get the message
out about how people can heal whether
it's on their own or whether through my
books or through free education, my
podcast, like your stuff. I mean, it's
it's it's a public service because
people are suffering and they don't need
to.
I feel that. I know everyone listening
feels that. And um thank you for
everything that you've done and again
for being such a pioneer and keep going.
Thanks. Thanks, Andrew. Thanks, Mark.
Thank you for joining me for today's
discussion with Dr. Mark Heyman. To
learn more about Dr. Heyman's work and
to find links to the various sources
discussed during the course of this
episode, please see the show note
captions. If you're learning from and or
enjoying this podcast, please subscribe
to our YouTube channel. That's a
terrific zerocost way to support us. In
addition, please follow the podcast by
clicking the follow button on both
Spotify and Apple. And on both Spotify
and Apple, you can leave us up to a
fivestar review. and you can now leave
us comments at both Spotify and Apple.
Please also check out the sponsors
mentioned at the beginning and
throughout today's episode. That's the
best way to support this podcast. If you
have questions for me or comments about
the podcast or guests or topics that
you'd like me to consider for the
Huberman Lab podcast, please put those
in the comment section on YouTube. I do
read all the comments. For those of you
that haven't heard, I have a new book
coming out. It's my very first book.
It's entitled Protocols: An Operating
Manual for the Human Body. This is a
book that I've been working on for more
than five years and that's based on more
than 30 years of research and
experience. And it covers protocols for
everything from sleep to exercise to
stress control protocols related to
focus and motivation. And of course, I
provide the scientific substantiation
for the protocols that are included. The
book is now available by pre-sale at
protocolsbook.com. There you can find
links to various vendors. You can pick
the one that you like best. Again, the
book is called Protocols, an operating
manual for the human body. And if you're
not already following me on social
media, I am Huberman Lab on all social
media platforms. So that's Instagram, X,
Threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on
all those platforms, I discuss science
and science related tools, some of which
overlaps with the content of the
Huberman Lab podcast, but much of which
is distinct from the information on the
Hubberman Lab podcast. Again, it's
Huberman Lab on all social media
platforms. And if you haven't already
subscribed to our neural network
newsletter, the neural network
newsletter is a zerocost monthly
newsletter that includes podcast
summaries as well as what we call
protocols in the form of 1 to three-page
PDFs that cover everything from how to
optimize your sleep, how to optimize
dopamine, deliberate cold exposure. We
have a foundational fitness protocol
that covers cardiovascular training and
resistance training. All of that is
available completely zero cost. You
simply go to hubmanlab.com, go to the
menu tab in the top right corner, scroll
down to newsletter, and enter your
email. And I should emphasize that we do
not share your email with anybody. Thank
you once again for joining me for
today's discussion with Dr. Mark Heyman.
And last, but certainly not least, thank
you for your interest in science.
[Music]