Essentials: Optimize Your Exercise Program with Science-Based Tools | Jeff Cavaliere
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of Huberman Lab Essentials, Andrew Huberman and Jeff Cavaliere discuss optimizing exercise programs using science-based tools for physical health and performance. Cavaliere suggests a foundational 60/40 split between strength training and conditioning, recommending that individuals aim to train at least three days per week with weightlifting on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, while dedicating Tuesday and Thursday to cardio or other conditioning work. He emphasizes that workouts should generally be kept under an hour unless specific goals require otherwise, noting that as people age, the duration of a workout becomes more problematic than its intensity if proper warm-ups are performed. While various splits like push-pull-legs exist, Cavaliere stresses adherence over theoretical perfection; he prefers grouping similar muscle actions together to maintain focus but acknowledges that "bro splits" can still be effective for those who enjoy targeting single muscle groups and achieving a pump. The conversation delves into the integration of cardiovascular training with resistance work, where Cavaliere advises placing cardio at the end of a session to avoid compromising strength performance or intensity. He advocates blending conditioning elements directly into strength workouts through drills like footwork ladders or bodyweight movements such as burpees and push-ups, which provide anaerobic benefits while keeping engagement high. A key concept introduced is the "Cavalier test," where one flexes a muscle to the point of discomfort or cramping before loading it; this indicates strong mind-muscle connection and neural recruitment necessary for hypertrophy. Cavaliere explains that muscles naturally shorten during recovery, particularly at night, so stretching should be timed carefully—dynamic stretches are used pre-workout to prime the nervous system without disrupting motor patterns, while passive stretching is best done later in the day or away from training sessions when performance isn't critical. Addressing biomechanics and injury prevention, Cavaliere highlights the importance of external rotation for shoulder health, warning against movements like upright rows that force internal rotation under load, which can lead to impingement over time. He offers a safer alternative called "high pulls" where hands are held higher than elbows to maintain abduction benefits while preserving external rotation mechanics. Similar principles apply to other joints; he notes the body functions as interconnected bands of tension and warns against gripping bars with fingertips during pulling exercises, which strains the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle at the medial elbow—a common cause of golfer's elbow or tennis elbow. He recommends deepening one’s grip so weights rest in the palm rather than drifting toward fingers to reduce strain on these vulnerable tendons and muscles. Nutrition is framed as a sustainable, non-exclusionary approach centered around Cavaliere’s "plate method," which divides food intake into three sections: fibrous carbohydrates like green vegetables taking up roughly half the plate (from 9 o'clock to 12), protein sources such as fish or chicken occupying another quarter, and starchy carbs like sweet potatoes or rice filling the remaining portion. He cautions against rigid diets that may not be maintainable long-term, emphasizing enjoyment and consistency in food choices for lifelong adherence. Regarding pre- and post-workout nutrition, he takes a pragmatic stance: whatever allows an individual to perform at their highest level—whether water with caffeine before training or protein afterward—is the optimal choice, dismissing dogmatic timing rules that might hinder performance if digestion becomes sluggish or energy levels drop. Ultimately, Cavaliere underscores consistency as the backbone of any successful fitness regimen, whether in programming splits, stretching routines, dietary habits, or recovery monitoring via grip strength tests taken daily to gauge systemic fatigue. He encourages listeners to experiment with different methods—be it total body workouts versus split routines or various nutritional strategies—to find what works best for their unique physiology and lifestyle. The dialogue concludes by reinforcing that while science provides valuable frameworks like understanding muscle mechanics or neural adaptation, personal experimentation often reveals the most effective path forward, empowering individuals to build resilient bodies through deliberate practice and informed choices without fear of failure if they adjust along the way based on feedback from their own bodies.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials,
[music] where we revisit past episodes
for the most potent and actionable
science-based [music] tools for mental
health, physical health, and
performance.
I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine. And now,
for my discussion with Jeff Cavalier.
Jeff, such a pleasure for me to have you
here. I'm glad to be here. It's amazing.
I'm a long-time consumer of your
content. I've learned a tremendous
amount about fitness and both in the
weight room, cardio, nutrition, things
that I've applied for over a decade. One
of your mantras is you know, if you want
to look like an athlete, train like an
athlete. And I think that's something
really special that sets aside what you
do from what a lot of other
very well-qualified people do. What's
the sort of contour of a basic program
that anybody could think about as a
starting place? I I think it's like a
60/40 split, which would be leaning
towards uh weight training, you know,
strength and and uh
and then, you know, the conditioning
aspect be about 40%. So, if you look at
it over a course of a training week, I
mean, 5 days in a gym would be a great
task. And obviously not in the gym, it
could be done at home, but 3 days
strength training, Monday, Wednesday,
Friday, conditioning, Tuesday, Thursday,
you know, 2 days. It's a it's a pretty
easy roundabout way to split that up. Of
course, depending upon training goals
and as you said, the aesthetic goals,
like that will shift dramatically. But,
if you want to see the benefits of both,
that's probably the
the effective dose for strength training
and the effective dose for conditioning
at the bare minimum level. We try to
keep our workouts to an hour or less, if
possible. Now, depending upon the split
that you're following, if you're on a
total body split, there's just going to
be more that has to be done in a given
amount of time. But, in general, when
you're not focused on that one aspect,
but the overall health picture, then
you can get the job done in in under in
under an hour. And again, I always say,
on top of if if you want to look like an
athlete, train like an athlete, is you
can either train long or you can train
hard, but you can't do both. As you
start to get older, it's the length of
the workout that actually causes more
problems than the intensity of what
you're doing. Particularly if you're
warmed up properly, like you said. I
have found personally that my warm-up
has had to become more of an integral
part of my my workout than it ever has
before. In terms of splits, you
mentioned splits. And so for those who
aren't familiar with this uh term
splits, it's really uh which body parts
are you training on which days? I've
seen you discuss, you know, 3 days a
week whole body workouts. I've heard of
splits like a pushing one day, uh
pulling another day, legs another day, a
day off, repeat. I mean, there's so many
variations on this. What's governing the
the split? Uh for me, the first rule is
will you stick to it? I don't
particularly like full body splits. I
don't necessarily like to have to train
everything. Now, of course, the volumes
will come down per muscle group, but if
you don't like to do that, and you
actually don't look forward to your
workout because you're dreading having
to do everything and feeling maybe too
fatigued by the time your workout's
over, or the fact that those generally
do take a little bit longer and don't
fit into your schedule, I don't care how
effective the split is, a split not done
is not effective. So, you need to find
one that fits. So, maybe you go into an
alternative option like uh um a
push-pull legs like you mentioned. That
can be done either one cycle through the
week uh on a Monday, Wednesday, Friday
split, or it could be twice in a week,
so you're actually training six times.
You know, where we where you repeat it,
you know, pull, push, legs, pull, push,
legs, or or, you know, uh you know,
however you want to do it with with
either a day off in between the 3 days
or at the end of the 6 days. Um and
again, that actually impacts your
schedule. I've broken that down before
where it's, you know, if you put it in
between the 3 days, it's good because
you're giving yourself an extra rest day
in between, but it starts to shift that
day off every week as we wrap around.
So, for those guys that were choosing
that 7-day schedule out of convenience
in our heads, you know, it starts to
mess with that off day. So, others like
to just keep it predictably, let's say
on a Sunday, and train 6 days in a row.
Um
But, that's a But, that's a a a better
way to maybe group similar muscle
actions together, which I think I I
definitely prefer that because if I'm
going to be training, you know, pulling
movements, at least there there's a
synergy between them, and I feel like
I'm looking to achieve one goal that
day.
Um and then, I mean, quite honestly, you
can go back to the bro split days. And
this Those still work effectively.
There's a reason why they worked in the
past. Like I think that science shows
that there's smarter ways to do them
these days. Like you can You can come
back and hit a related muscle. So, you
could do, let's say, biceps on one day,
and then come back 2 days later and do
back, realizing again synergy between
the the exercises there. Your biceps are
going to get restimulated again. So, you
could figure out ways to make that work.
But, the thing that I think is is
effective there is that tends to be one
of the ones that people like the most
because they can go in, they get their
pump, they feel good, they it's it's
pretty solely focused on one muscle
group. Is that the definition of a bro
split? One One
>> group a day, yeah. I see. So, it's very
much geared towards strength and
aesthetics, really maximizing Yeah. So,
probably probably more more aesthetics
than strength, yeah. In terms of
the mixing up of cardiovascular training
and resistance training. Um same day,
different day, which one should come
first, which one could should come
second? So, again, I I I think that the
you know, the bare minimum is probably
twice a week in terms of cardiovascular
if you want to have some semblance of
cardiovascular conditioning. But, I
think most people who actually need it
more or want to pursue it more than that
are going to need more time to do that.
So, um at some point, it can't just be
relegated to a day off or a day off from
the from the weight training workouts.
So, at some point, it has to occur on
the same day, you know? And in that
case, I just like to put it at the end
of the workout cuz you don't want to
anyway compromise the weight training
work workout. The intensity of those
workouts is important. I just like to,
you know, put that at at the end
realizing that even if my effort level
is lower, my output is lower, if it's
still placing a demand on my cardiac
output to get that conditioning effect
because I'm fatigued, it still has a
demand on my cardiac output. So, it's
still achieving its goal, but it didn't
interfere with my main goal of being
able to increase my performance in the
gym. And in terms of the form of
cardiovascular training, I've seen you
um do a number of
I have to say uh very impressive uh
high-intensity interval type work rather
than uh on the treadmill or out jogging
for 30-45 minutes. Is that because you
prefer higher intensity um higher heart
rate type um training?
>> If we could blend
function across these realms and not
have such a delineation between this is
my weight training and this is my
conditioning, but figure out a way to to
blend them together. I always think that
you've got you've got a better
opportunity to get that more
well-rounded result. And I like to kind
of mix up that straight conditioning
work and also some of the footwork, you
know, drills. Like we have we we have
some high expectations for guys that
come into our programs. Like to just do
some footwork drills. Like ladders.
>> Like ladders or or line drills or
something. And you know what happens?
People become intrigued and interested.
Like, I've never I've never tried this
since uh high school, you know? And
they become interested in just the
challenge of it. And then as we become
almost distracted by the challenge,
we're now like finding ourselves
conditioning, you know? And and I always
think that's an important part that
sometimes you got to draw people in um
to get to show them what they might be
interested in. And from the output or
the effect of it, I just think that when
you're able to blend some of some you
know, still maintain some of that
strength training into the exercise. So,
as you mentioned, let's say I'm doing
some kind of a push-up or a burpee. I
mean, there is there is a
um an anaerobic component to that that
is going to be helpful um that that
rather than just walking or just
jogging. Um Not just not to say that
that isn't an effective means for strict
cardiac conditioning. It's a it's one of
the ways that we've had for, you know,
centuries, you know, to do it. But, I
just think that if we can blend it, then
it becomes maybe a little bit more
interesting and you get some of those
crossover benefits and it doesn't become
so segmented in terms of what we're
trying to do. One of the most important
things I learned from you so over the
years was that if you can flex your
biceps to the point where it hurts a
little bit, like it almost feels like a
cramp or a cramp where you can flex your
calf to the point where it really cramps
up a little bit, almost feels like it's
knotting up, that's a pretty good
indication that you're going to be able
to stimulate that muscle well under load
if you're doing the movement properly.
Right. How did you arrive at this kind
of cramp test, the Cavalier test as I'll
call it? During my
uh workouts even as a as a young kid
just starting out, I wanted to know what
was supposed to be doing the work.
Once you do that and you start to seek
that out and say, "Okay, well, the bicep
is what's supposed to be doing the work,
then I want to make sure the bicep's
doing the work, right?" So, I would seek
out ways to make that happen better. And
when I was able to do that, I could feel
the stronger contraction. I was no
visionary. I just felt like I I knew
that that was going to be better for me
if the muscle I was trying to grow was
being stretched more. When I was
attempting to do this across different
exercises, I would notice that what I
could do potentially on a
curl where my arm is up, you know, where
you asked me to flex my bicep, that
position, I couldn't do if I was, you
know, doing a concentration curl or I
couldn't carry over to a cable curl. And
that shouldn't really change, right? Cuz
the function is still largely the same.
There's still elbow flexion, there's
still supination. Like, why am I not
able to do it there? And that's when it
sort of clued into me that like you your
mind-muscle connection on not just your
mind with one muscle, but on every
exercise matters and it varies from
exercise to exercise. There's a term I
like to call muscularity, you know,
which is a difference, right? It's the
level of sort of resting tone in the
muscle. That improves dramatically. You
know, if you can learn how to just start
to
engage that muscle better,
the muscularity, the the resting tone of
that muscle is harder, it's more alive.
That's all driven from being able to
connect better neurologically with the
muscle that you're trying to train. When
you're trying to go and create muscle
hypertrophy or even this muscularity
that I talk about, you need to seek ways
to make it feel more uncomfortable,
right? If you don't feel the discomfort,
then you're doing something wrong. And I
struggle to this day on certain muscle
groups to still do that even knowing
what I'm trying to work. It's very
difficult for some muscles and for
certain people to do this on certain
muscles, but
as you mentioned, practice does help.
And the more you become,
you know, consistent and deliberate with
what you're trying to do, the more of an
of a result you actually get. How do you
assess recovery at the local level,
meaning at the level of the muscles? So,
we'll talk about soreness and getting
better, stronger, more repetitions, etc.
And then at the systemic level, at the
level of the nervous system. Different
muscles recover at different rates. You
might have a bicep that's able to be
trained that can be trained again
the next day.
You know, and then the next day. And
then maybe you need a day off after
that. That can vary from person to
person for sure and it can vary from
muscle to muscle in that person over the
course of time. As you mentioned, cuz
the systemic recovery is going to impact
all those muscles anyway, but let's say
you're systemically recovering,
every muscle itself is going to have a
recovery rate and I think that using
muscle soreness as a guideline for that
is is one of the only tools we have in
terms of the local level. Well, that's
the one that most people can relate to
and easily identify and then use that as
a guideline and if you're training when
you're really sore,
it's probably not a great idea. But as
far as the the the systemic, you know,
recovery, grip strength is very very
much tied to performance and recovery.
And when I was at the Mets, we used to
actually
take grip strength measurements as a
baseline in spring training all the
time. Now, obviously, as a baseball
player, you're gripping a bat, you're
pitcher, you're gripping a ball. Like,
you know, grip having good grip strength
is important. So, if we noticed somebody
had a very weak grip, it's just a good
focal point of a specialized training
component for the program.
>> day with those guys? No, we would do in
spring training we'd do sort of a
baseline entry level measurement and
then we would we would measure it
throughout the season, maybe once every
2 weeks or 3 weeks. And and and you
know, the the idea there was to measure
the recovery. We have found that with
with one of those scales, those
old-fashioned bathroom scales, it's a
great tool for just squeezing the the
the the scale with your hands and seeing
what type of output you could get.
Imagine the last time you were sick or
that when you or just try this, you
know, the next time you wake up in the
morning. When you first wake up in the
morning, you're still groggy. Try to
squeeze your hand. Try to make a fist as
hard as you can. You're going to sit
there angry at your fist because it
won't contract as hard as you know it
can. You don't have the ability to just
create the output and that is because in
that state you're still sleepy, you're
still fatigued, you know, you're you're
not even awake at the you know, the the
whole level at this point. So, when you
start to measure that on a daily basis,
you can get a pretty good sense of where
you're at. And I think when people start
to see a drop off of 10% or so or or
even greater of of their grip output, um
you really should skip the gym that day
because I don't think there's much
you're going to do there that's going to
be that that beneficial. Even if it is
the day to train legs or whatever day it
is. I mean, there certainly are more
sophisticated tools to as a as a PT, you
know, we have a
hand grip dynamometers, you know, we can
we can measure one side at a time. Tell
me what that comes the cost of the
pretty expensive devices, but if it's
Listen, if you're an athlete, you know,
the the 200 300 bucks it cost to have
one of those would be well worth, you
know, the added investment.
>> When's the best time to stretch for
particular types of results? And maybe
you could define some of the different
types of stretching. In general, the two
basic forms of stretching are active
stretching and passive stretching. And
your passive stretching is done with the
goal of trying to create an increase in
the flexibility of the muscle. So,
whether you're actually increasing the
length of that muscle, well, you know,
more so what you're doing is increasing
the resist or decreasing the resistance
of that muscle to want to stay at a
certain level of flexibility. When we
can sort of take the brakes off and
allow that muscle to to allow us more
range of motion, we're inherently in
increasing flexibility without
necessarily having to increase the
length of that muscle. That is usually
done at a time far away from your
workout because there is a period of
recalibration that is needed after doing
this because you're disrupting the
length tension relationship of the
muscle that causes you to not
necessarily be able to rely on these
I've talked about before stored motor
engrams in your mind in terms of this is
the pattern for how I swing a golf club,
say, you know, and
now introducing a little bit of
flexibility or added flexibility or
range because of the stretching I did
before, it takes maybe a hole or two or
three to match up again
Oh, this is the this is what he's trying
to do that golf swing thing I that I
remembered again. Like it's not
remembering that every component like I
have to bend my right wrist back 10° and
then I have to bend my elbow and I have
to bring Like your body stores these
patterns for motor efficiency. So, and
when I have to start matching up that
stored pattern with what's feeling new
because of the increased range, I can
impair performance. And again, it could
happen even in a a gym workout where
you're talking about your first second
set third set um where it maybe the
repercussions aren't as big cuz I'll
just do a few extra sets. But in
performance, if you screw up your first
three rounds, you play on a PGA tour and
you shoot, you know, you're you're
you're six over after three, you're
you're you're done, you know? So, we
relegate that, as I mentioned, sort of
towards the end of the day, when it's
not going to impact performance, but
even maybe have the additional benefit
of creating the the feeling of length or
the increase or decrease in resistance
to this length, um at a time when I know
my body is going to try to tend to heal
and heal shorter. Never longer, but heal
shorter. So, if I can introduce a little
bit of that extra uh length or or
decrease resistance to to that length,
it's a better time to do it. So, I think
it promotes a
a better recovery. I'm intrigued by this
concept of heal shorter. So, part of the
healing and recovery process means a
shortening of the muscles. This is the
tensing up in sleep. Could you elaborate
just a bit on that?
>> Basically, you know, what what's been
shown is that when I'm when the the
repair process, muscular repair from,
let's say, strength training during the
day, the repair process usually results
in a muscle that is slightly shorter
rather than increased in length. You
know, muscles prefer to sort of ratchet
their way down into that that uh
contraction. So, when you're sleeping,
it it tends to err on the side of
shorter rather than longer, when ideally
we don't really want that. We want to
maintain as much of that length, because
with more length, we actually have more
leverage. So, again, it's just making it
a conscious choice to do it at a time of
the day that makes a little bit more
sense. Dynamic stretching is really not
done for that purpose of trying to
create any type of increasing the the
potential length, as you said, of the
muscle, but more so the readiness of the
muscle to perform. And
increasing, you know, exploring the ends
of that range of motion in a more
dynamic way, so you're not hanging out
there and disrupting that length-tension
relationship, but just sort of touching
the ends of those barriers, so that you
when you feel movement again, it feels
looser, it feels more ready. And at
obviously at same time, warming up,
blood flow, all the benefits we get from
just warming up in general. So like, you
know, that's that's the series you
probably seen a bunch of times, but
like, you know, leg swings and butt
kicks and, you know, lunge walking
lunges and those are the drills that
people will do prior to training that
are both excitatory in terms of just the
nervous system, but also helpful for
just the general warm up the body cuz of
the blood flow, but from a muscle
readiness standpoint, not impairing the
performance while at the same time
exploring the increased ranges. When I
was working with Antonio Brown, I
remember like he would spend 20 minutes,
30 minutes on all dynamic work. And I've
never seen anybody spend that long on
their dynamic work, but like
he said he just didn't feel right and
ready to go unless he did a lot of that.
And I mean, you know, his his dynamic
stretching routine would be a workout
for most everybody. There's one exercise
and one particular motion that I'd like
to discuss for a moment because I
believe that
learning about this cautionary note from
you
is one of the reasons that I've
maintained steady training for 30 years
with no major injury, knock on wood.
And that's the upright row. I learned
from you that the upright road
compromises
some important aspects of our shoulder
mechanics and could be actually sort of
a dangerous movement in some ways. But
so I've always made it a point now on
the basis of this advice to really
strive for external rotation. Please
tell us about internal external
rotation, why this is so important, not
just for weight training,
but as in terms of posture and mechanics
and and not looking like a melted candle
or partially melted candle. The shoulder
has the most mobility in the body of any
of any joint, but it's also got the
least stability, right? There's always
that trade-off of mobility and
stability. So
your stability comes from, you know, a
certain muscle groups. And one of the
ones that the only muscle group that
actually externally rotates the shoulder
is going to be the rotator cuff, okay?
And unless you are devoted to training
through external rotation and exercises
that are going to externally rotate the
shoulder, you're not training that
function. And it's so easy for us in
everyday life, especially those that
aren't training, to not ever really
undergo any of those stresses that could
be beneficial to counteracting what
happens freely and naturally, which is
internal rotation. So, when you think
about the imbalance created just by
nature and how we live our lives,
internal rotation far, far, far
outweighs external rotation. So, you
need to address it. And the reason why
you need to address it is because you
need to normalize those biomechanics of
the shoulder if you want their long-term
health. And one of the functions of the
shoulder is to raise our arm up over our
head. And if we do that from an
internally rotated position,
we're going to have a higher likelihood
of creating stress inside that joint. In
order to get normal mechanics and free
up the joint maximally inside, you need
to externally rotate as you raise the
arm up. So, if your muscles aren't
firing and they're not necessarily, um,
as strong as the internal rotation bias
that pulls them in, you're asking for
trouble every time you do that. Well,
this exercise is literally putting you
in elevation and internal rotation. And
if you were to walk into a PT office and
someone said, "I think he's got
impingement. Will you diagnose him?"
There's a test called the Hawkins
Kennedy test, and I would put you in the
position I know we're not visible at
this point through the podcast, but I'll
put you in this position here, where I
have your arm elevated and your hand
pretty much under your chin, pushing
downward on that to create that internal
shoulder rotation. Pretty much the exact
position that we're in when we're
holding a bar in in an upright row.
Some will say, "Well, just don't go so
high. Go only up to the level of the
chest, but you're still in this
internally rotated position.
The The thing that I think frustrates me
the most about the exercise is that
I have an alternative, and the
alternative does the same thing in terms
of helping the muscles grow by simply
fixing the biomechanics of the exercise
but just allowing the hands to go higher
than the elbows. So, instead of the
elbows being higher than the hand, which
drives you into internal rotation, if
the elbow is lower than the hand, the
hand being higher here, I'm in external
rotation. And I could do something
called a high pull and still get the
same abduction of the arm and still get
the same benefits of the shoulders, the
delts, and the traps without having to
undergo any of the stresses that would
come from the somewhat awkward movement
of an upright row. Now, people will
argue, this is the way they argue, that
"I've done this for 30 years and I've
never hurt myself." And I always say,
"Yet."
Yet. Like I listen,
>> [clears throat]
>> the goal is to not hurt yourself ever.
So, even if you It's sort of like, you
know, the
championship game. You know, you might
play the game of your life, but if you
lose, you lost. And when you get into
the end of the you know, the record
books, you're still lost. So, even if
you had the game of your life, you lost.
I don't care if you do it for 30 years,
no pain, you're still doing it and
there's no pain. I'm giving you an
option that's going to give you the same
results in the exercise that you're
seeking. That's why you're doing the
exercise.
Without the the possibility of having
the you know, the the the bad outcome
come from it. The body is like a mirror
image. The hip is like the shoulder,
right? The ankle is the wrist. The foot
is the hand. Like they're they're they
function The knee is the elbow. They're
two hinge joints. They function that
way. Well, with the shoulder, you've got
that mobility that comes from having all
that freedom of motion, but the
stability is lacking. Well, the same
thing with the hip. Like you've got
mobility, but if you don't fully
stabilize it by training all of the
muscles of the hip, and if you don't
strengthen the external rotation of the
hip, then, you know, you've you're
you're going to have issues. Like it's
not biomechanically going to work the
same way. If you think of the body as a
series of, you know, bands, you know,
pulling in different directions at
different levels of tension, you know,
you're being pulled into one direction
or the other just by the balance of
tension from one weak area to one
dominantly tight area, and you need to
make sure that you can sort of balance
this out in order to eliminate some of
the adaptations and compensations that
happen. One of the great uh tools that I
I I picked up from your content, which
has benefited uh I know a a huge number
of people is I think I used to hold uh
weights sometimes in the in the tips of
my fingers as opposed to in the meat of
the palm of my hands, and I had elbow
pain. Turns out towards the end of my
pull-ups or my bicep work, I was letting
the weight or the bar drift into my
fingertips. And the mere um
shift to making sure that my knuckles
were well over the bar or that the
weight was really in the meat of my
palms has completely ameliorated that
for reasons that you point out, and
maybe you could just share with us why
that is. When you grip a bar, whether it
be through a curl or whether it be
through And and this is mostly pulling
exercises because the tendency for the
bar is going to be to fall out of your
hand, not like with a pushing exercise
where it's kind of, you know, you're
you're pushing your hand into the bar.
So, on a bench press, say.
Um that bar can drift
just by gravity, you know, doing its
thing, or fatigue of the
the hand grip strength, can start to
drift further away towards the the
distal digits, right? Through those
through those last couple knuckles that
we have on our hands. Though our hand
can still hold it there, the muscles are
not equipped to handle those types of
loads. And it could start at dumbbell
weight, you know, 40 lb, 30 lb, you
know, even 25 lb for some, depending
upon their overall strength levels.
But then when you start to apply it to
something like
your body weight with a chin-up, right?
Cuz that's natural for the bar to
somewhat kind of float down towards your
fingertips. And it actually is a little
bit easier to perform the exercise with
that sort of like false grip little hook
grip at the end of because you're not
going to engage the forearms into the
exercise. You're not going to start
pulling down.
But at the same time, while it could
help you to perform them better by
getting the back more activated, if you
have weakness in these muscles cuz it's
not a it's not a thing that happens to
every It's not one of those upright row
type things where I think this is
happening to everybody. This is
happening to people that have these
inherent weaknesses in in this these
muscles. You or or haven't done enough
of the gripping in the four in in the
meat of the hand, you know, for long
enough. But it starts [clears throat] to
put that stress on these muscles that
are ill equipped to do this and it to
handle this and it starts to
particularly on that fourth finger, you
know, which is part of the muscle we
call the FDS, the flexor digitorum, that
is just too much for it to handle. And
that comes all the way down and meets
right at the medial elbow, right on that
spot that you can say feels like
someone's knifing you right in the
middle in that medial elbow. And and
medial epicondylitis or they call it
golfer's elbow is something that
a lot of us deal with in the gym. It's
one of the most common inflammatory
conditions people get from the gym and
it all comes from this positioning of
the dumbbell or barbell or hand on a
pull-up bar over time. So, the easiest
thing to do is just grip deeper so that
what you're doing is you're using you
know, more leverage from the palm to
encapsulate the bar or the dumbbell or
whatever and you're not putting that
pressure really distally right on that
last digit because that's where the that
FDS muscle is most strained. So, you
you're just almost eliminating that from
the equation. And And And it's one of
those exercises that the load can exceed
its capacity pretty quickly. So, that
like, you know, maybe it's only capable
of handling 30 lb and then when you're
doing a chin-up and it goes and it
drifts so far that it's Now, you have to
say you're a 200-lb guy, you've got
let's say 100 lb through one arm and 100
lb this is simple simplified math that
obviously is offset by other muscles,
but 100 lb through one arm, 100 lb
through the other one, 100 lb off of a
muscle that can handle 30 is not going
to take many repetitions to strain it
and you're going to feel that maybe by
the time that set's over or certainly by
the time that workout's over or the next
day you wake up and you've got that
notable stabbing pain. Whenever someone
feels that, the best thing would be to
determine, okay, what exercises was I
doing that were pulling and where the
bar could have drifted deeper there into
further from the meat of my palm into my
fingers and figure out a way to deepen
that grip. When that happens though, the
best thing to do with most of these
inflammatory conditions is not do any of
that stuff for a little while. There's
so many other options that you can do
that will train similar muscles or even
the same motion and not cause that
stress. So, I mean a cable curl would be
much easier to do that on than let's say
a chin-up where you don't have the
control over the weight like you do by
moving a pin on a stack. I do have a
question about precision of record
keeping. Do you keep a training journal?
Uh do you recommend people keep training
journals? I think that anything you can
do to increase your awareness of your
performance and also give yourself some
objective goal. Whenever we have an
objective goal, it's a lot easier to
actually obtain it. When you're just
there to get a pump and you're just
there to lift how you feel that day, um
you have to be incredibly disciplined in
all other aspects of your workout in
order to make that effective. Anything
you can do to increase your awareness of
it and keep you on track with that is
like I'm endorsing fully. If we could
talk about principles around nutrition.
What tends to work? What tends not to
work? And um yeah, how should we think
about nutrition? My approach is like
I've always been sort of a low sugar
lower fat guy. That is the best approach
for I believe, again, in my opinion
personally for the overall big picture
because though the people can take
exclusionary approaches to nutrition and
taking carbs out or you know, you know,
eating only fats and proteins or
again, I'm not saying it doesn't work
for you and if it's the first thing that
actually allowed you to gain control of
your nutrition to the point where you
actually saw results and got to a
healthier weight, then I always say then
do it. Then do it, but just make sure
it's something you can do forever and
doesn't bring upon other repercussions.
I think that non-exclusionary approaches
to diets are the
the most sustainable for the rest of
your life. And when I and all I'm
interested in from a nutrition
standpoint is something that's
sustainable. In terms of what you do
eat, how do you structure that um in
terms of when you look down at a plate,
you've done these described this before,
but I think it's just a beautifully
simple description cuz I think a lot of
people don't want to do calorie counting
and all this and I have what I like what
I call plate method and it's just it's
just simple cuz it works for me. When
you have your plate, you just simply
look at it as like a like a clock,
right? And um if you just make a 9:20 on
the clock, so one arm goes over to the
nine and one of the arms goes over to
20. Cuz you're going to make a line
towards 12:00, too. And the largest
portion is going to be your fibrous
carbohydrates. So that's the the you
know, the green vegetables, all right?
So whether it be broccoli or Brussels
sprouts or asparagus. Those are the ones
that give us a lot of the micronutrients
we need. They're the ones that are
generally, you know, accepted as more
healthy. Um and they're also going to
provide the fiber that's going to be
both beneficial in terms of its impact
on insulin and also just through filling
you up, right? And then I take the next
largest portion of that and I devote
that towards protein. And I think it's
really important, especially for anybody
active. Um the more active you are, the
more you embark on trying to build
muscle, you're going to need to have
protein in every meal. So I have that.
And again,
you know, we're talking cleaner sources
of protein. But like I I am you'll never
find like boiled chicken on my plate.
I'll have some sort of fish or chicken
and but I they'll it will be it will be
cooked in a way that's that's like, you
know, it's got maybe some sauce on it or
it's got some maybe it's tomato sauce or
it's anything to just make it a little
bit more palatable and interesting
without blowing the value of the meal.
And then that last portion is where I
put my starchy carbohydrates. And again,
that's the part that some people will
say exclude them entirely cuz they're
not healthy or they don't work for you
or they're not, you know, beneficial
long-term. For me, like most people, my
body craves those carbohydrates. I
choose things like sweet potatoes, which
is my favorite, you know, or I'll have
rice or I'll have pasta. I will have
those things. I'm not excluding them,
but I don't put them in the portions
that you would generally find. No plan
is going to work if you're eating stuff
you don't like. It's not going to work
forever. Nothing will. You have to
really enjoy what you're eating. As long
as these these
uh
variations of this meal are something
that you really enjoy and there are
limited versions of them, the
reproducibility of that is simple. If
everyone listening to this podcast can
figure out their nutrition issues, this
whole world would be different. That is
like one of the largest sources of
disease and and pain and discomfort
because people really struggle with
nutrition. What are your thoughts in
terms of the the nutrition science, the
train the training-related effects of um
the post-training meal? Is it something
you think people should pay attention
to? I'm not very dogmatic about what
specifically to eat pre or post, you
know, workout, but I do think you should
have protein
um surrounding your your training,
whether that be ahead of time or after.
Protein could be a little bit
hard to digest for some people. So, if
you do that pre-workout and then you're
finding your workouts slogging because
you don't feel good, then suddenly you
put that after your meal. But, this
whole concept of the urgency of time has
thankfully been removed and we can just
learn to eat a little bit more uh
you know, responsibly and even as far as
pre-workout supplements. a lot of people
don't take them. A lot of people don't
like them, they don't take them, they
don't like they're not necessarily even
being used as the new nutritive side of
the pre-workout, they're just more new
used to fuel the workout. Um, for
me it's water and some form of caffeine.
Yeah, I mean it's whatever, you know,
again, I think it's important, I do
think it's important to maintain a high
level of output. So, if your pre-workout
nutrition requires a stimulant in order
to help you do that, or if your
pre-workout nutrition is
causing you to have a harder time to
train because you're feeling full or
stomach ache or something else, then
then that that's not achieving what
you're trying to do. The ultimate goal
is to still be able to perform at the
highest level. So, whatever your
nutrition is required to allow you to
still do that, that is probably the most
important factor of all of it. I hate to
say but it's a lot less scientific than
we want to make it, and as it seems to
be coming back often times like the
thing that works for you is really the
most important thing because ultimately
getting your ass in there and doing what
you do is is really the thing that
provides the best benefit. I think when
you hear things like this that like,
"Hey, that will work and that will work
too and that this will work too." You
know, rather than the dogmatic one way
only approach, um, which could be become
discouraging for people. Um, then I
think it becomes a little bit uplifting
like, "Well, I've never tried that. I've
actually never tried a total body split
or I've never tried, you know, that
style of eating." Like,
it becomes encouraging that you might
want to explore and then you might
finally get locked in and say, "I really
like this." And then you're off and
running. On behalf of myself and all the
listeners, I really want to thank you.
And what I love about all of this
knowledge that you've given us is that
there's a there's a backbone of logic,
you know, and and some consistent themes
indeed about consistency and but the the
the logical backbone I think is what,
um,
will enable people to really show up to
the table and stay there, uh, for
training consistently over time.
>> I'm happy I was able to make it work cuz
I really have been watching your stuff
for a while and I really I love the
science of it. I like the way you think.
I'm just really fortunate I was able to
do it. Well, I feel very gratified in
hearing that and and honored to have you
here. So, thank you [music] so much.
Thank you.