Body Language Expert: How To Overcome Awkwardness | Vanessa Van Edwards | EP 565
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Vanessa Van Edwards, a behavioral researcher and Harvard instructor who identifies as a recovering awkward person, explains how soft skills like body language can be systematically learned rather than relying solely on natural instinct. She highlights that anxiety often triggers specific non-verbal cues known as the "trifecta of awkwardness," which include shrinking posture or turtling, vocal tension leading to reduced volume, and uptalk where sentences end with a rising inflection. These signals are frequently misinterpreted by observers as indicators of immaturity, submissiveness, or a lack of credibility, particularly for high-achieving individuals who possess strong intellectual skills but fail to convey them due to social anxiety or an overemphasis on IQ at the expense of emotional intelligence. Edwards argues that while people often assume non-verbal cues reflect deception, they usually stem from anxiety about one's presence rather than a genuine lack of competence.
To overcome these challenges and project both warmth and competence, several key strategies are essential for navigating social interactions effectively. Establishing trust requires displaying high-warmth signals such as smiling, open palms, and appropriate eye contact within the first thirty seconds to signal safety and openness before transitioning to discussions about strengths or goals. This transition is difficult because standard small talk scripts often trigger autopilot responses that do not build genuine connection; therefore, using positive primers like asking "What's good today?" instead of generic questions can help break these patterns. Additionally, one should avoid self-touching behaviors which signal anxiety and disengagement, opting instead for purposeful gestures and leaning in when making important points to demonstrate clarity of thought without the need for notes or long-winded explanations that suggest a lack of knowledge.
Successful negotiation and professional interactions also depend on mastering specific mechanics like greetings and handshakes while respecting personal space zones to avoid discomfort. When greeting others, it is crucial to be the assertive party by clearly signaling a desire for contact through an open palm or verbal cue, rather than forcing touch if the other person shows fear cues like wide eyes which can cause stress; similarly, offering hands vertically with a firm but not painful grip and maintaining moderate eye contact sets a professional tone. Beyond physical gestures, adopting a mindset of gratitude for opportunities instead of viewing them as mere luck helps overcome self-consciousness, while framing requests to authority figures around being a problem solver who takes burdens off their plate rather than begging for favors shifts the dynamic from supplication to offering value. Ultimately, effective success requires lubricating competence with warmth so that others feel safe opening up while recognizing one's contributions, ensuring that hard work is communicated clearly and individuals are not overlooked by peers who may take credit for collective efforts.
Read the full video transcript
[Music]
Why don't you study for people like you
study for chemistry? Why don't you study
conversation and body language just like
you study for subjects?
>> Vanessa Van Edwards is a behavioral
researcher, a best-selling author, an
instructor at Harvard University, and a
self-described recovering awkward
person.
>> I know I'm a recovering awkward person.
I am the person that I try to help. Soft
skills can be learned even if they don't
come naturally to you. The amount of a
pause, how long should a pause be, how
many pumps in a handshake. You're an
expert in non-verbal communication, so
size me up.
[Music]
Vanessa Van Edwards is a behavioral
researcher, a best-selling author, an
instructor at Harvard University, and a
self-described recovering awkward
person. She's the author of Cu's Master
the Secret Language of Charismatic
Communication. And her YouTube videos on
body language and social skills have
received more than 70 million views. We
spoke to her today about decoding body
language, overcoming awkwardness, and
putting your best foot forward.
So, Vanessa,
tell me about my
posture and seating in this to begin.
You're an expert in non-verbal
communication. So, size me up.
>> Well, first of all, I love that we are
angled towards each other. I have a
little bit of a pet peeve when people
are angled halfway. You know, have you
ever seen that where they have the setup
where they're angled away? The the brain
loves when we're on parallel lines. So,
I love that even through a camera. Also,
a a distance that most people don't
think about is the distance between our
ears and our shoulders. It's my favorite
distance. And the reason for that is
because when we're anxious, when we're
afraid, we tend to take up as little
space as possible. You'll see people
will turtle where they sink their head
down and they tend to creep their
shoulder Exactly. They tend to creep
their shoulders up. It's a cue that we
don't think about. In fact, we often do
it in first impressions. We say, "Hey,
nice to see you."
>> Right. Right. Compressed like that. E.
Yeah. You see people standing up
sometimes when they do that. They'll go,
"Hi." And they use that up uplift. Is
that what it's called?
>> Up talk.
>> Yes. So there's
>> Yeah. Up talk. There's this trifecta of
uh I would say awkwardness that can
happen in a first impression and they
all are related to each other. First,
we're a little nervous in that first
impression and so we take up as little
space as possible. We turtle down. We
shrink up. That immediately shortens my
vocal power, right? I it it has less
oxygen. I have more tension in my neck.
I also tend to clench my jaw which then
creates a little bit less volume which
then makes me sound nervous. And then I
use as you said upt talk. So good
morning. I'm so happy to be here. And
what the brain does when it hears the a
an accidental question in flection, it's
called a question in flection. So, my
name is Vanessa. I'm here to talk about
body language. When you hear me
accidentally use a question in flection,
your brain goes from listening to
scrutinizing.
The reason for this is because liars
often accidentally use the question in
reflection because they're asking, "Do
you believe this?" So if I say to my
daughter, you know, did you take the
cookie from the cookie jar? And she
goes, no.
>> Right. Right.
>> That movement, it subconsciously, even
if you're not lying, it triggers the
part of our brain that goes, "Uh-oh,
something's off here." And we don't like
to hear people who are questioning
themselves cuz we don't want to feel
that we're questioning. And so I think
that that trifecta in that first
impression, and you do it, you did it
beautifully. Maximizing this distance,
that's the most important one. Second, I
can see space between your torso and
your arm right now. And that is a very
subtle signal of you're comfortable
enough that you're not trying to block
or protect your torso. Anytime we're
tight to the side or tight exactly when
tight to the side, that signals I feel a
little bit discomfort. I want to protect
my vital organs. Even if we're just cold
and so what I say to people is you could
be doing this because you're actually
nervous. But you could be doing it out
of bad habit. And a lot of our
non-verbal pet peeves are bad habits or
because you're cold or because you're
allergic. It doesn't matter your reason.
All that matters is the people who are
watching you. They're making a very
quick impression of you. And it often
happens, I'm sad to say, less in less
than a second. I'm quickly seeing are we
aligned? He's taking space here. I see
space. He's not protective. Oh, and we
see a lot of vocal flexibility in that
very first word. And our verbal first
impression usually happens on hello.
>> H. So that that uptalk I I see a lot of
people doing that and it seems to me
that that's a sign of appeal to
authority. It's a sign of difference.
It's a sign um it's also a way of
signaling harmlessness because children
use uplift
a lot uptalk a lot. What it indicates to
me when I see someone doing that is it's
either a prolongation of immaturity
or it's it can be manipulative, right,
to to mask yourself in a way that so you
appear much more harmless than you
actually are. Um, it's I suppose
it's it's a way of also
force stalling aggression
because if you signal that you're
immature, then what you're doing is
you're asking for support from other
people.
>> Yeah. No, I think that's right. I I see
any kind of negative non-verbal cue and
cues are all contextual, but let's use
uptalk as an example. There's actually
two factors. There's external and
internal. External is exactly what you
just mentioned. Maybe you're trying to
show difference. Maybe you're trying to
show submissiveness, right? You'll often
have people who they're asking
permission or they're trying to show,
I'm not a threat to you. Those are
external reasons. You also might have
external reasons that someone makes you
very anxious or nervous. And so you're
with a boss or you're in a negotiation.
I hear uptalk a lot in sales contexts
where someone asks their price. So,
they're on the phone and they say, you
know, we'd we'd love to work with you
and the price of this service is $5,000.
Now, what what they did there is they
are internally thinking, I'm not sure
about this number and neither should
you. Or are you going to say yes to this
number? I'm worried you won't. And so,
that gives away your vocal competence
because you're saying to this person,
there is room to negotiate here. or we
ask a boundary because we're nervous
about the external source. The internal
reasons though, and this is I think
where it gets more interesting, is if
you don't feel worthy, if you have
self-doubt, if you feel like you don't
belong or you have imposter syndrome,
which so many people do, you use uptalk
regardless of the outside. And so you go
into a presentation or a meeting or a
date or an interview and you ask your
name, you ask your value, you ask your
salary, you ask your answer, and people
go, "Uh, I can't trust this person." But
it actually has it's not a decept it's
not being deceptive. They're literally
just so anxious they cannot deliver with
vocal confidence.
>> Do you think that assessing the
situation that way? So people are going
to make their assessments based on those
non-verbal cues. Hypothetically,
the assessments evolved and have
function just like the behavioral
demonstrations. And so
I one of the things that I was
considering when I was reading I I was
reading Q's master the secret language
of charismatic communication.
I I was curious. You lay things out very
explicitly
and it's hard for people to learn to
change their behavior as a consequence
of mere explicit instruction too. But
why would we presume that there's
actually a gap that needs to be closed
between how someone is presenting
themselves and the inference? Like why
shouldn't I just assume that if someone
is
adopting a prey position P R E Y prey
and they're
indicating anxiety and they're using up
talk why shouldn't I indicate why
shouldn't I conclude
that what that non-verbal behavior is
telling me is actually correct now you
you talked a little bit about
about bad habits
And that maybe that's part of the
answer. So
>> yes, um this is such a great question.
Bad habits is one, but I actually have a
bigger one and this is I think the
reason why I wrote this book. Most
people have very very good ideas.
They're very wellprepared. They have a
lot of competence or books smarts and
they have no idea how to share that. So
their competence is there, their ideas
are very good, but when they get in the
room, they have social anxiety, they
have awkwardness, they're not sure how
to read cues, and so the prey behavior,
the uptalk, the the bad non-verbal
habits come into play because they are
anxious about their presence but not
their ideas. So my what I makes me angry
is when you have someone who has a
brilliant idea, a great presentation,
they'd be a great hireer in an
interview, but they show up and they
have no idea how to answer the
questions. Even though their competence
is there, they're so nervous about their
presence, they can't show it.
>> These are questions that take cultures
thousands of years to answer. During
answer the call, I take questions from
people just like you about their
problems, opportunities, challenges, or
when they simply need advice.
>> How do I balance all of this grief
responsibility? How do you repair this
kind of damage?
>> My daughter Michaela guides the
conversations as we hopefully help
people navigate their lives. Everyone
has their own destiny. Everyone.
[Music]
Okay. So your primary target, let's say,
is people who subvert themselves
unconsciously
and
portray themselves as less competent
than they actually are. And so that
would be likely associated with high
trait neuroticism.
>> My favorite personality trait.
>> If you
if you if you look at what predicts
success, this is something else I wanted
to talk to you about. You talked about
warmth and and competence and the best
marker on the personality side for
competence is conscientiousness.
But warmth is more ambiguous I would
say. And so we should delve into that
because
the literature that I read on management
styles suggested that or management
personality suggested generally that
less agreeable managers are more
effective. Now, it's a hard thing to
parse apart a because that immature
self-presentation you described, that
could be a consequence of neuroticism,
but it could also be a consequence of
agreeableness that's too high, right?
And so, if you're agreeable, you don't
want to come across as a threat.
And so, you can revert to behaviors that
indicate that you're harmless. Okay. And
so,
all right. So, we're going to talk about
people who are
undermining their own ability to
progress forward because they're they
lack what do they lack? They lack social
skill
>> or they're just unconscious of the way
they're presenting themselves.
>> It's a it's a bad combination of, you
know, I I call them high achieving
awkward folks, right? Like they really
want to do well, very smart. So it's uh
uh yes it can be a lack of social skill.
It also could be an overemphasis on IQ
over PQ where they're they were so
focused for so long on developing test
scores and books smarts and studying and
they focus a lot on the data. I work
with a lot of engineers very highly
technical folks and they're very very
hyperfocused on their numbers but they
get in the room and they have no idea
how to make eye contact. They have no
idea. So, that's a lack of knowledge
where as long as if they're told, "Hey,
here are the cues for warmth and
competence. I only want you to try cues
on that actually work for you. I'm I'm
there's 97 different cues I've sort of
identified, and there's some that work
for people and there's some that don't."
Okay, you try on a couple of cues that
work for you. Here's the recipe of
warmth and competence. If you add those
cues, people are more likely to believe
your data. And this comes directly from
the research. So, Dr. Susan Fisk is sort
of the pioneer in it's called stereotype
content model right the warmth and
competence model and this she said that
competence without warmth is likely to
leave us feeling suspicious
and suspicious that is the killer
because what happens is someone gets in
the room they're over hyperfocused on
the numbers and and the idea which is
which is great but they get in the room
they think my ideas will speak for
themselves I don't need to add warmth
and then they don't even know what
warmth be. So, even when they get in the
room and they can feel, uh-oh, people
are suspicious of me. They're asking me
really hard questions. They're making
not making eye contact. They're they're
not believing my slides. Then they're
like, what do I do? What do I do? And
so, then it creates this horrible cycle
of awkwardness where it gets even worse.
>> Right. Right. So, people will note from
the non-verbal behavior of the audience
members that they're not being attended
to. Right. So, they lose the audience.
So, let me tell you some things that I
do when I'm lecturing. and you can
comment on them if you would. So I never
use notes.
So and my my sense of that is that if
you have to use notes,
then you actually don't know what you're
talking about. And then
someone might say, well, I have to
discuss some very complicated material
that I'm not I haven't fully mastered
and so I need the details of the notes.
And my response to that usually is pitch
at the level that you're able to, right?
And so then I I also try to remember
before I go on stage that I'm happy to
be there and that I'm pleased that the
audience is there. So, I'm making a real
effort not to regard them as adversaries
or judgmental adversaries because I
believe that people can tell if that's
your assumption pretty much the moment
that you walk on stage. Your non-verbal
cues indicate fear of the audience. And
then the audience is wondering what the
hell you're doing there if you're afraid
of them. And then I also make eye
contact with people continually when I'm
speaking. So I'm never or seldomly
speaking to the crowd. It's one person
at a time with eye contact. And the
advantage to that is that you can tell
by watching the person that you're
making eye contact with whether they're
receiving the message.
There's also a a chemical component
there that's going to help any presenter
which is, you know, we talk about
warmth. Well, what does warmth mean?
It's one of the harder ones. I agree
competence tied to conscientiousness.
Yes, warmth is hard because it's tied to
chemically speaking oxytocin. Now, we
know oxytocin is very complicated. Does
a lot of things in our bodies. But the
way that we produce it socially is two
major ways. Touch, so handshake, high
five, fist bump, or eye contact. In
fact, research even shows that you and I
can make oxytocin even through a webcam.
As long as I can see your face and you
can see mine. So, when you get on stage
and you're trying to very quickly build
trust, your competence is there. You're
going to speak without notes. Great. The
way that you physically, physiologically
produce warmth is by trying to make eye
contact with individual people in the
audience. And I will add a little tip on
top of yours cuz I agree with you. I
make eye contact with my nods if
someone's in the audience.
>> Oh, yes. That's a good one. Yeah,
>> I find
>> Yeah. Yeah. You want to make eye contact
with people that are paying attention.
>> Paying attention. And I know I'm a
recovering awkward person. Okay. I am
the person that I try to help, which is
a high achieving awkward person. If I'm
on stage and I sense
negative doubt, someone who's not on my
side, I can get in my own head and then
all of a sudden my non-verbals are off,
my confidence is off. But if I find my
ners, I know I'm with people. They are
with me. And so I make eye contact with
them. It's a gift to them. I'm gifting
them oxytocin. But more importantly,
it's a gift to me. I get oxytocin which
makes me feel connected, belonging, and
calm, right, which I need on stage. So
eye contact with individual people and
your nauts is extremely important. The
second thing that you mentioned was or
one of the things you mentioned was not
having notes. So I'm going to add a
nuance here. I very much agree that your
notes are distracting for the audience,
right? If you're shuffling around flashc
cards or you're trying to look at notes
in your podium, it's the audience is
going to wonder, well, why where is
their competence? Why didn't they why
don't they know this so well they can
deliver it to me? I would add though,
it's really important to reduce your
audience's cognitive load.
I I think just like you, I'm presenting
some very complex topics. You know, I'm
going very fast on stage. I know that if
I'm just delivering to them with one
mode verbal, they're having to take that
all in just by listening. So, I will
sometimes have notes for myself, but
also really for the audience with
visuals or um bullets behind me. So, my
slides are kind of my notes in terms of
how I want to pace myself, but also I'm
lowering listeners cognitive load by
saying, "Hey, warmth and competence is
82% of your impressions." And then
behind me I have a giant slide that says
82% of our impressions are warmth and
competence. That does two things. One,
if heaven forbid I forgot the number
because I got nervous, it would be
behind me, but I know it. But more
importantly, they see that with a visual
of how much that is in a pie chart and
it doubles up the layer of
understanding. The other thing I'll note
here if we're talking about cognitive
load is the importance of hand gestures.
I think as a presenter and I don't know
how much you think about this on stage.
I think it's important that we Dr. Susan
Goldwin Meadow is the researcher behind
this that the more gestures you add
especially if they're explanatory
gestures the more information is
conveyed. So if I say to you you know
Jordan I have uh five diff I have three
different ideas and I hold up five. It's
even hard to to misalign them and I hold
up the I hold up five but I say I have
three. Your brain is like no no no
Vanessa it's five. you're actually more
likely to believe my gesture over my
words. Or if I were to say, "Today I
have a really big idea and I hold up
like I'm holding a little penny." Your
brain kind of goes, "No, it's a small
idea. It looks so small." So if you can
demonstrate concept phase one, phase
two, we have three different things.
That's like giving notes to the
audience. And so I think that notes is
an interesting um you can be you can be
playful with it with visual notes, but
also even gesture notes.
You know how HIPPA protects your medical
information? Doctors can't share
anything without your consent. Whether
it's diabetes, surgery, whatever, that's
federal law. But here's the problem.
Every time you search online for medical
information, data brokers are tracking
it and building a profile on you. Then
they sell that profile to whoever pays.
And just like that, your HIPPO
protection is worthless. And insurance
companies, they buy these profiles and
then use them to raise your premiums.
And there's no law stopping this. Until
one gets passed, there's really only one
way you can protect yourself.
ExpressVPN. ExpressVPN sends all your
online activity through encrypted
servers. Nobody can see what you're
browsing, not your internet provider, no
data brokers, not anyone trying to
profit off your medical history. Your
information and activity is yours alone.
Both our hosts and production teams here
at the Daily Wire use ExpressVPN to
reroute all their daily activity through
ExpressVPN secure encrypted servers to
hide their IP addresses each and every
day. They can browse freely without
feeling like they're under surveillance.
Plus, all it takes is one easy click and
it works on all your devices. You can
even use it on eight devices at once.
And right now, you can get an extra four
months free when you use our special
link. Head over to expressvpn.com/jordan
and get four extra months of ExpressVPN.
That's expvpn.com/jordan.
[Music]
>> Mhm.
So I tend to gesture a lot when I'm
lecturing and I get parodyied for that
which is fine but I'm bringing that up
because it indicates that it's
noticeable. Now you said that you're a
recovering awkward person but you
gesture quite a lot and so how much of
the persona that you have did you
develop like consciously?
>> Yes. I mean, you come across, let me
see, you come across your,
let's how would I say? Well, your
shoulders are are back. So, that's
that's relevant to that concept of
fronting that you described. So, you're
not closed off. Um, you're you're very
attentive in terms of eye contact and
you use a lot of non-verbal gestures.
Now, my suspicions are that that would
be rare among someone who's
awkward. And so, how did you would you
say that you learn to let yourself use
hand gestures or did you learn did you
actually practice? How much of the way
that you're presenting yourself would
you say is a consequence of conscious
practice?
>> You know, awkwardness shows up a lot of
different ways and this is one of my
favorite topics. The stereotype about
awkwardness is still less gesture, less
attentiveness, lack of eye contact. But
that's only one way that awkwardness or
even social fear shows up. There's also
awkwardness in bigger, more gestures,
over-the-top gestures. And in fact,
that's where I skew.
So I skew quite high on um the gestures.
In fact, there's in non-verbal, I like
to say there's there's always too much
of a good thing. So, I love a gesture,
but if I had hand gestures for every
single word, it would be interpretive
dance. I love nodding, but I actually
nod too much. I'm an overn
gestures, movement, nodding. So, I've
had to just just dial down a little bit.
So, it's always when people work with
me, I'm like, "Okay, we got to figure
out where are you? Are you on the low
end where we have to dial up to your
comfort level, but we have to add a
little more gesture? Are you too high?"
So I when I was for example let's take
nodding nodding in western cultures
actually most cultures except Bulgaria,
India and Pakistan uh this vertical nod
is a yes and a horizontal nod is a no.
So we recognize this in those cultures
as being affirmative or agreeing. Also
if the research shows that if I triple
nod while you're speaking you're likely
to speak 67% longer. So, if I want you
to open up and I go, "Mhm. Mhm. Mhm."
That tells you, "I'm here. Tell me
more." But if I'm in conversation with
you and the entire time I'm uh-huh,
uh-huh, uh-huh, it actually takes away
my competence. It makes me look like I
am too agreeable or a people pleaser.
So, I've had to replace
the nod with a head tilt because it's
physically impossible to do both at
once. So I had some awkward moments
there where I was like I have to nod
less even especially if I don't agree
with someone. So what was happening for
me on a personal note is I was over
nodding. I was over gesturing. I had too
much movement and it was distracting and
I didn't even agree with folks. I was
just so nervous about being liked. I so
wanted to be liked that you know I would
yes Jordan please like me. You know I
would be nodding to you. And I realized
that was not serving me because it
actually made me look too too trusting,
too open. And so what you see in front
of you is me with calmed
calmed gestures and calm nodding. I also
try really hard to not fake a cue
because I think that you can't fake it.
I think that people pick up on it. They
are inauthentic. So if I don't actually
like something, I will not smile. As a
recovering awkward person, I would smile
by default all the time because I wanted
people to like me. So the other way
awkwardness dresses up is that sort of
fake smile. Do you like me? And we read
that as inauthentic. And so I have also
if I I have the tendency even with you
to smile for you like I want to smile
and say this is good. But if I'm like
nope, I only smile if I actually feel
excited about an answer or if I actually
feel excited about something. So
awkwardness kind of dresses up in two in
in two different extremes,
>> right? So that triple nod, that seems to
me something like I get it, then I think
about it, then I agree. Maybe that's the
signaling of the trifecta.
>> Oh, I like it. I never thought about
that before. Maybe it's um I hear you,
right? Like that acknowledgement. Yes.
And Yeah. And then you're internalizing
it. Ah, yes. I agree with that. Yeah.
And then it's like keep going.
>> Ah.
>> Yeah. and you're signaling it.
>> And then, by the way, look at the
difference. So, non-verbal is so
interesting. A slow triple nod,
interest, curiosity, engagement. A fast
triple nod, impatience. So, watch the
difference. So, we go, "Tell me more."
>> Yeah. Right.
>> Versus, "Uhhm." Mhm. Mhm.
>> Yeah. Get on with it. Right. That's an
indication to mimic my speed and to move
more rapidly towards your goal,
>> right? To be the same as this. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Mhm.
>> Mhm. So that that smiling too.
>> Yeah.
>> That is a proclivity of women more.
>> Yes.
>> Cuz if you look at men and women are
approximately equal in extraversion, but
you can break extraversion down into
assertiveness and
um
and enthusiasm.
>> Outgoing. Yeah. Enthusiasm. Yeah.
>> And women score women score higher on
enthusiasm. So they're signaling more
positive emotion as a general rule and
so they'll they'll smile more as well.
So
that
up uptalk
and the hunch
combined with nodding that definitely
signals subordinate status,
right? And I suppose it's those are
appeasement gestures in some way because
if you signal that you're harmless or
you're signaling even though you don't
know it that you're like a child, then
you're going to
present yourself as an inappropriate
target of aggression or perhaps even
competition.
And so maybe you want that in some
circumstances, but if you're attempting
to market yourself as competent, that
seems like a bad approach. I wonder, you
know, there is this
trope which is mostly false that women
are underpaid
compared to men, let's say, in the same
position. Now, most of that's rubbish or
can be accounted for by factors other
than sex, but I've always had the
suspicion that some of that might be
agreeableness, right? Because women are
higher in agreeableness than men. And it
isn't exactly obvious that the proper
way to negotiate a raise, let's say, is
through excess agreeableness. Because
what you're signaling is that you'll
pretty much put up with anything because
you're dependent. All those things we
talked about, the uplift, the the
condensed body, too much nodding, too
much smiling, that all indicates a
state. It's signaling dependency. And
you that's not appropriate if you're
trying to sell something.
And it's not appropriate if you're
trying to bargain for a raise or a
promotion. It signals exactly the
opposite. So, do you know of of any
research linking
these immature styles of
self-presentation
to wage to earnings? I haven't seen
anything directly related to wage, but
we do know that your non-verbal cues in
a salary negotiation directly impact
your bottom line. So when we they look
at non-verbal cues and we can say yes
that if you're using all those
appeasement signals, people are going to
doubt your competence because you have
too much warmth. And we know that even
by watching silent videos of interviews,
people can decide how competent someone
is without hearing them speak, which is
which is horrifying, right? And so, um,
for example, I think MIT did a study on
mirroring in salary negotiation. And
this is an interesting one because both
men and women mirror, uh, and actually
mirroring, you could argue, I'm going to
argue it, is a bit of an appeasement,
right? It's a get along kind of a
non-verbal cue. The more mirroring that
you have in a salary negotiation. So,
the more that the interviewe mirrors
their interviewer, the higher the
outcome of the salary. And so we know
that any kind of non-verbal cues or all
different kinds of nonverbal cues affect
that that number. And so yeah, I think
that we can while I haven't seen direct
research on warmth and competence or men
and women, we know that those non-verbal
cues are affecting your number.
>> Delve into mirroring a little bit. And I
suppose the way I would think about it,
I I'll set the question up is that
when you're communicating with someone,
you want to share the framework that a
goal, a mutual goal provides. So you're
establishing a little space where
communication can take place, but it's
in relationship to some mutually agreed
upon end.
uh otherwise you're imposing on them.
And
mirroring, which I'll have you describe,
indicates that
your physiological tendencies
are allied with them, with theirs. It
means you're going somewhere together
because it's movementoriented.
And so, but describe mirroring and
suggest to people how you think it might
be
attended to and perfected.
>> So, mirroring is the subtle mimicking or
copying mirroring of someone's cues. And
actually, um, I take a bigger approach
to mirroring, which is it's non-verbal,
it's can be verbal, it can also be
vocal. And I like to think about it in
all three ways. For example, if you're
with someone and mirroring showcases
engagement, alignment, and I say it's
nonverbal respect, you don't have to
agree with what someone is saying to
mirror them. You're basically following
their energy. You're saying, "I respect
you so much that I'm going to align my
verbal, vocal, and non-verbal cues to
match you as a sign of respect." It's
the same way where we would we dress up
for a formal interview or we dress more
casual for a casual interview. It's the
same. It's a form of non-verbal respect
saying, "I'm meeting you where you're at
as opposed to you meeting me where I'm
at." So, we have three options with
mirroring, and it's a very powerful It's
a very powerful tool. First, non-verbal.
This is the most obvious one. So, if you
nod, maybe I nod, right? If if you're
leaning forward in your chair, maybe I
lean forward in my chair a little bit
more, too. If um you're making an eye
contact pattern, there's different eye
contact patterns, but if you're making
an eye contact pattern where you
brainstorm up here, you'll often see
people will process complex ideas and
they won't make eye contact because they
actually don't want the oxytocin.
They're trying to have full focus and
then at the very end of their statement
and they deliver to you. That's an an
eye contact pattern. And you can also
use that if if that feels comfortable.
But there's caveats here. One, I never
want you to use a cue that feels fake or
inauthentic. it will come across as fake
and inauthentic. So if you can match
them and that feels good to you, great.
Second, it must be subtle. The worst
thing that we could possibly do is like
Simon says, you know, like you know,
they touch their face, you touch their
your face, you you cross your arms, I
cross my arms, like that that would be
the worst. So this is a a subtle
following of energy. My second favorite
way to mirror and the one that I use the
most often is vocal.
Vocal is an underestimated channel that
we have to communicate and we're already
doing this subconsciously and there's
some beautiful research on this but we
tend to mimic the resonance of the most
powerful person in the room without
realizing it. So already we are attuned
to the vocal power. So for example, you
speak more slowly than I do Jordan. I'm
a fast talker and so for our interview I
want to respect the way that you
communicate and also the way that your
listeners probably prefer to listen
right so I am like like take a breath
right calm down you don't have to be you
know so rapid nervous you can just take
a breath so I'm doing that because a it
feels actually really comfortable for me
feels less nerve-wracking but also I
want to show you that I want to speak at
your same pace we also can do this
verbally this is called I call it being
a verbal chameleon. When I'm trying to
bond or connect with someone and they
use certain kinds of words, if I like
those words, I will use those words as
well. So, for example, when you're
asking me a question and you use the
word alignment and I'm like, that is a
good word. I'm going to try to use that
answer back to you to talk about
alignment. Or when you say, you know, I
when I'm on stage, I'm, you know, trying
to connect with my audience onetoone.
I'm going to try to use those same
words. That's a very advanced way to do
it, but it's I think that's a way of
showing non-verbal respect and building
rapport in a beyond the ideas, right?
Those are just the way that we're
communicating. Then it helps us when we
get to the actual ideas.
>> Let's talk a little bit about some of
the other phenomena that you mentioned
fronting. Now, human beings are strange
creatures because we walk upright. And
so that means that unlike four-legged
animals, we aren't protected by a a suit
of armor precisely, right? So the most
vulnerable parts of us are full frontal.
And so
that accounts at least to some degree
for why the concept of fronting is
important. So do you want to delve into
that to some degree? Yeah, you explained
it perfectly. There's there's two
reasons why we like to front and why I
think this is one of the easiest cues we
can do. We can do it on video. So, how
we position our camera is actually very
important for how we're getting along
with people. So, making sure that your
work camera or your Zoom camera or your
phone camera if you're propping it up is
exactly in line with the other person. I
see very people with their setup where
they're off to the side. Um, so video in
person and even in chairs like if I'm in
a conference room and I'm around a
boardroom table, I love rotating chairs
or rolling chairs because I will rotate
my body to whoever is speaking as a way
of showing honorable respect. What does
this fronting do? One, it shows as you
said, I feel comfortable enough with you
that I don't feel I have to block my
vital organs. But more importantly, I
think there's a synchronization that
happens when our toes, torso, and head
are on the same level, that we are
parallel. Literally, our bodies are
parallel. It is easier to open up to
someone when we are physically on the
same line. There's one exception to this
that I think is important to note.
Driving in a car, you'll notice people
will often open up next to each other.
sitting at a bar. You'll often notice
that especially men, they'll they'll
open up sitting next to each other at a
bar or walking together. Deep long walks
on the beach, people will open each
other. Why? Sometimes when we're feeling
like we want to talk about something
deep or vulnerable,
fronting is too much. It's like, whoa,
you know, you're looking at all of me.
And so sometimes, like I have two young
daughters. Sometimes it's funny, you
know, she'll tell me a lot from the
backseat of the car when we are the
opposite of fronting because I think
like she can say something without some
without me fully, you know, looking at
every single cue. So again, there's
always too much of a good thing.
Sometimes with fronting it can be too
much. And so if you want someone to open
up to you, start with that. But if
they're feeling uncomfortable or they're
awkward or they're introverted, you
could try actually the opposite of
fronting and being side by side or in a
car cuz that might give them permission
to feel they can open up without being
judged.
Are you tired of spending countless
hours and dollars on health and beauty
products that promise to make you look
and feel younger without seeing real
results? That's where Fatty 15 comes in.
It's actually the first new essential
fatty acid discovered in over 90 years,
which is pretty incredible. This
nutrient called C-15 strengthens our
cells and cellular level and has three
times more cellular benefits than
omega-3 or fish oils. What's really
interesting is that up to one in three
people might be deficient in C-15, which
can cause something called cellular
fragility syndrome. Basically, when our
cells become fragile and age even
faster. When our cells don't have enough
C-15, they break down more quickly. And
since our cells age, our bodies do too.
The good news is that C-15 actually
repairs age related damage to cells and
protects them from future breakdown.
Studies show that 72% of users report
seeing benefits within 16 weeks, like
better sleep, healthier skin, improved
energy, and even smoother functioning
joints. It's clinically proven to
improve things like liver function, and
red blood cell health within just 3
months. Plus, Fatty 15 comes in this
gorgeous reusable glass jar with
convenient refills shipping right to
your door. Fatty 15 is on a mission to
optimize your C-15 levels to help
support your long-term health and
wellness, especially as you age. You can
get an additional 15% off their 90-day
subscription starter kit by going to
fatty15.com/peterson
and using code peterson at checkout.
So
if you're
facing each other front to front,
that maximizes the possibility of
self-consciousness,
right? Because I know that you're
looking at me completely and you can
evaluate me. And so you the
circumstances where with your daughter
she's in the back seat. She
I guess you're doing her a favor in that
situation by
removing the pressure of your gaze.
That's what Freud did, you know, in his
famous
therapy sessions. So he sat to the side.
His patients would often lay down in
Freud's famous couch and he sat to the
side. And the reason he did that was
because he wanted them to be able to
speak freely
without
mirroring anything that he was
broadcasting.
So maybe it's the situation that
if the purpose of the conversation is
for the other person to reveal
themselves, the rules are different than
they are when the purpose is mutual and
reciprocal exchange of information.
So I wonder if that's true.
>> I I mean look
>> account for what you just described
>> it. I I don't want to make a hard and
fast rule because yes, of course, I want
someone to feel comfortable, you know,
sharing something vulnerable, but I also
want someone to share with me where I
can read their micro expressions, you
know, where I can um take take a pulse
of how they're doing non-verbbally. So,
there's no hard and fast rule here. It
depends on what your goals are. Freud's
goal was to let people free associate,
to let them open up without judgment,
and to not bond with him.
He he didn't need the oxyiosin for
himself. He needed them to be focused
and just free associating. That's a very
different goal. Versus with my daughter,
sometimes I do just want her to free
associate and just tell it all to me.
But there are times where I'm wanting to
talk to her and I want to see is her
face sad. You know, is she blocking? Is
she distancing from me? Is she all of a
sudden leaning back? That's going to
give me more nuance. So, I don't think
we can have a hard and fast rule. But
what we can know is that our cues are
changing how people treat us. Our cues
are changing how people act. The
positioning of our face, our body, the
sound of our voice, it's going to
trigger different effects in different
people. And we have to be aware of how
powerful those are. And I think if
you're aware of that, you can choose
your cues based on your context and your
goals.
So if you're in a job interview
and you're using
the immature strategies that we
described like a prey posture, uptalk,
too much smiling.
What I think what you're doing is you're
there as a supplicant and you're asking
the dominant primate to bequest
something to you. It's a favor. So
you're using signals of immaturity to
curry favor with someone who's dominant.
Now the disadvantage to that is that
that puts you in a subordinate position
and that's a ma that can be a major
disadvantage. That's a lot different
attitude than a job interview where your
goal is to portray
your competence.
Now, we could talk we could talk think a
little bit about the different
approaches there because if you're the
supplicant asking for a favor,
you're not bringing anything to the
table except the potentially implicit
promise that you would return the favor,
right? And so the the job that you're
being offered or the raise or the
promotion,
that's now a favor. Whereas if you
configure your attitude to indicate
competence,
what you're doing is signaling to the
person that you're talking to that you
have something of value to bring to the
table and that it would actually be in
their interest to
offer you what it is that you want. And
it seems to me that that's a much more
appropriate and and successful
negotiating stance unless the person
that you're negotiating with is also
hyper agreeable and will give it to you
just to be liked. That's quite unlikely,
I would say, when you're dealing with
people who are extremely successful
because
they either don't need to be liked
because they have enough people who like
them or they're not temperamentally
inclined inclined to go in that
direction. So, what do you think the
best signals are when you're negotiating
on your own behalf? And what mistakes do
you see in addition perhaps to the ones
that we've been describing?
>> Yeah. Well, the what when you're going
to interview and you said it I think
exactly right is competence is going to
be incredibly important for worth and
your value right showing I have the
skills to bring to this job and we pay
for skills but there is a time issue
here and the research shows that when we
first meet someone we're trying to
quickly answer two questions can I trust
you and can I rely on you and they're
chronological trust goes first reliance
ience goes second. So in an interview
situation or a date or a meeting, you
actually want to show trust first. High
warmth signals in the first minute, 30
seconds. So high warmth signals that are
good is if you're actually happy to be
there, say you're happy to be there. I
think you mentioned before you get on
stage, you remind yourself that you're
happy to be there, that they're on your
side. Incredibly important because
exactly, you want to be able to say,
"I'm so happy to be here. Thank you so
much for having me." Great. That's a
genuine warmth. Second, visible hands.
And I think this goes back to, you know,
our caveman days, right? When we were
approached by a stranger caveman, we
wanted to see their intention. Were they
carrying a rock or a spear? So, I
recommend everyone have open palms uh on
upon first greeting. So, you walk into
the room or you hop on video, nice to
see you, good morning, oh, so good to
see you. And then you reach out for the
handshake if you're in person. P open
palm literally shows it signals to the
other person's brain, I am not hiding
anything. There's a reason why we say
get your hands up. Palms show intention.
So first few seconds you're greeting
with an open palm and ideally a
handshake if you're in person. That
physical touch is a way we produce
oxytocin. Second, if you feel happy,
smiling, right? That's a a nice warmth
cue if you feel happy. Third, you're
engaging in eye contact to produce that
oxytocin. Okay, warmth. Got it. Right?
Like that's going to set the stage for
you can trust me. I'm not hiding
anything just from an innate
perspective. Then you want to go into
reliance. And there's this weird, I'll
even say potentially awkward few minutes
in every interaction, especially
interview where you're transitioning
from warmth to competence. And that is
called small talk. This is why there are
books written about small talk is
because it is very hard to go from, oh,
it's so good to see you. Thanks so much
for having me. Tell me your greatest
strengths.
Like that gap is quite hard. So to be
highly charismatic, I think that you
should be assertive with that
transition. That's what I teach. Okay?
To be assertive, we're going to break a
social script. This is one way that we
signal both warmth and competence. Do
not say, "How are you?"
Do not say, "How's it been going?" I can
tell you, you will socially script them.
You engage the brain in this is an
autopilot interaction. So if you ask
your interviewer, "So how are you?" and
they say, "Oh, this is what I'll say.
Good, busy, but good."
>> Yeah.
>> You've just shown them that this is
going to be like every other interview.
And part of this is like breaking those
scripts. So, do not ask that. You're
going to ask for a positive primer.
You're going to try to cue with
something positive. Borrow excitement
from other areas of their life. So, you
can ask
what's good today. What's good today is
a a very subtle shift. It makes the
other person go, "Oh, what's good
today?" You have just changed their
thinking pattern from wherever they were
before, their inbox, their tasks to
good, good, good, good, good, good,
good, good. That is going to make them
more optimistic. It also allows you to
talk about good things, which is much
better for warmth, right? So, you're
going to ask what's good. You could also
ask, you know, have any fun plans for
the weekend? Do anything fun this past
weekend? Right? I have a um a little
joke that I like to share that is useful
where on Mondays and Tuesdays you can
ask everyone you meet, did you do
anything fun and exciting this past
weekend? On Thursdays and Fridays you
can ask, have any fun and exciting plans
this upcoming weekend? On Wednesdays you
just don't talk to anyone works great.
So or you could ask have any fun
exciting plans this week. So you're
breaking the script which creates a
little bit of warmth. Then you can
transition into competence with your
answer cuz what they're probably going
to say is how about you or tell me about
your week. You should be ready to go
with a story that shows a little bit
about your behavior that transitions
into your prep for the interview, right?
Like prep is a competence cue. And then
we can go into non-verbal competence.
Non-verbal competence is purposeful
gestures. So no uh accidentally touching
the face. We really don't like that.
There's Cornell research that looked at
behaviors that trigger feelings of
mistrust. What's hard about this
research is we have to be very careful.
These aren't actual cues of deception.
These are cues that people perceive are
deception. So if you accidentally do
them, you are triggering feelings of
mistrust. They are touching the face,
touching the body, blocking the body, or
distancing, leaning away or leaning
back. Those behaviors, they tend to feel
like disengagement. People don't like
them. So, you want to make sure that you
doing the opposite of those things.
You're still, unless you're using
explanatory gestures, you're not doing
any kind of self-touch. Self-ouch is
either a flirtatious, courtship behavior
or it's an anxious, self soothing
behavior, pacifying behavior. You want
to make sure that you are on your plane
on your level plane or you're leaning in
when you feel something important.
You're not leaning back or distancing or
taking a step back. So in that way, we
can then begin to build our competence
cues and then we answer really competent
on top of that.
As we celebrate Independence Day this
July, we're reminded of the freedoms our
founders fought to protect, especially
the fundamental right to life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness. But here's
something that might surprise you. There
are still Americans today whose most
basic right, the right to life itself,
is at risk. That's where Preborn comes
in. They're doing incredible work
through their network of clinics
offering free ultrasounds to women
facing unplanned pregnancies. And here's
what's absolutely amazing. These
ultrasounds don't just provide medical
care. They're actually saving lives.
When a mom sees her baby on that screen,
hears the heartbeat for the first time,
everything changes. But Preborn isn't
just about the baby. They truly care for
these women as well. They provide love,
support, and resources during what can
be an incredibly difficult time. Look,
if we really believe what the
Constitution says, that all people are
created equal with unalienable rights,
then this has to include the smallest,
most vulnerable among us. These babies
deserve the same rights that our
founders declared: life, liberty, and
the pursuit of happiness. You can be
part of that mission for just $28.
That's the cost of a life-saving
ultrasound. Or you can sponsor five
ultrasounds for $140. To donate, just
dial pound 250 and say, "Baby." That's
pound250 baby or visit
pre-born.com/jordan.
That's preborn.com/jordan.
>> There's a lot there. One of the things
that I was considering while you were
laying out those observations was that
your non-verbal behavior is probably
dramatizing
and then signaling
your interpretation of the place as a
drama.
So, let's say one of the things you
might ask yourself, for example,
when you go to speak to your boss for a
raise, it might well be worth asking,
who is this boss to you? What's your
narrative about them? What's their
characterization?
And who are you in relationship
to that figure?
Cuz otherwise that's going to take place
unconsciously.
And so if your boss is intimidating and
terrifying and you adopt the role of
supplicant because that's your
conceptualization,
then you're going to dramatize that with
your non-verbal behavior and indicate
it. So you want to get your attitude
right
so that you're playing the right game.
And so
what's the right attitude to have
towards your boss? Well, if the
situation is kosher if it's set up
properly,
then you're each playing a mutually
beneficial role in relationship to some
shared end.
So even though that person might be
superordinate to you in that
hierarchical position, that doesn't mean
that you have no value or that you have
nothing to offer.
And so
what behaviors are indicative? This
would touch on the issue of competence.
What are the behaviors that would be
indicative of the fact that you have
something to offer? So you're
approaching a position of equality when
you when you adopt that stance. I mean
when I was coaching people
to accelerate the growth of their
career,
I encouraged them to
make the requests that were in line with
that goal to actually let the boss know
that
they were interested in adopting more
responsibility. It's a very different
idea than I'm interested in having more
money. That's not relevant. Everyone's
interested in having more money. So if
the role of your boss in your
raise drama is bestower of money, you're
not going to get anywhere because the
proper attitude of any boss is well
everybody always wants more money. So
that doesn't make you unique and it
certainly doesn't indicate that you're
bringing anything to the table. A much
more appropriate strategy is to
put yourself in a position genuinely
that
where your services are both vital and
productive. And then to indicate that,
you know, and maybe this gets to the
core question that we open the
conversation with is
how do you know when you're
non-verbal signaling, which would be the
drama that you inhabit, is
counterproductive?
And the answer to that would be you do a
lot of the work, but you get none of the
credit. And that that's genuine. And
then someone else, you're leaving a
space for someone who's more
psychopathic, so they can play dominance
games and their non-verbal behavior
codes for confidence. They can steal all
the credit from you because you're not
doing a good job of communicating your
value. So then when you go to ask for
the raise, what you should have in mind
is what the hell you're good for and why
it would be beneficial to the person
that you're speaking with to provide you
with additional resources and so what
behaviors would go along with an
attitude like that say rather than
supplicant or or questioner.
>> Yes. So when you are seeing your boss, I
think you want to have two narratives
going in. Either problem solver, which
is I think a a a coming a part of
competence where you're going in saying
my value here is solving whatever your
problem is. Whether that's a personnel
issue or a company issue or a value
issue, your narrative, that career
narrative you're going to go into is not
I want more money because that doesn't
that's not that's not going to appeal to
them. It's I am so competent that I can
solve this company's problems, your
problems, the team's problems. I'm a
problem solver. That's what I competent
is such a big word. No, it's problem
solving. That's we can rely on people
who solve our problems. So your verbal
answers, your evidence is all going to
be around solving their problems. That's
the the the brainchild of competence. Or
if you're like ah my my value is not
there. The brainchild of warmth is being
an ally. And there are bosses who need
this and will give raises for this. This
is I am empathetic. I am compassionate.
I have high emotional intelligence. I
have high interpersonal intelligence. My
value on this team and to you is that
I'm a wonderful listener. I have my
pulse of the behavior that's going on in
this office. I'm a champion of you and
your ideas. I can read you well. In a
way, it's sort of soft skills and hard
skills. And I wish that we talked about
this more. And I think this is the only
choice we have in the age of AI. This is
career insurance. You either have to
know I excel in soft skills, the warmth
side of things where I can support
people on the communication side or I
thrive in hard skills, specifically
problem solving. Less so unfortunately
the hard skills of programming or you
know software development.
Unfortunately, I think that those are
going to start to be replaced. But we
can have hard skills of I'm a problem
solver in this office and I'm going to
take problems off your plate. That's how
people get raises
>> rather than cause them, let's say.
>> Yes. And the behavior cues along with
that, there's so many ways that we could
take it. First of all, of course,
verbally using those words. I mean,
literally saying, I'm going to provide
this value to you with the with the
reasoning. But
>> yeah, yeah,
>> how to sound smart is something I think
about a lot because so many of my
students are so smart, but they don't
sound it. And I'm like, what is the
disconnect here? What is happening? We
talked about uptalk which is an
important one but verbal acuity
verbally being able to organize your
thoughts is a skill that can be learned
and if you have mental acuity you can
learn to verbalize it. This means the
myth is speak in longer more complex
sentences with bigger words. We actually
don't think of that as smart. In fact we
like people who speak in short
declarative sentences with concise ideas
and have shorter more specific words. So
what smart people often do, the mistake
they make, one of the biggest mistakes
is they try to speak in more complex
ways. That actually is the worst thing
for your competence because it makes it
sound like you actually don't know what
you're talking about. So practicing how
can I verbally organize this? I want to
raise for these three ideas and
literally holding up the number three
first, second, third. That is all
competence cues because you're saying I
know my content so well. I can speak to
you on two tracks. I can speak to you
with my words, but I can also speak to
you with my gestures. And boy oh boy, do
we like to rely on people who can speak
to us on two different tracks and it
organizes for us. So your boss, who's
probably doing a bunch of these meetings
all day, their brain is half in their
inbox. The more you can have clarity of
the way that you speak with your
gestures, with your non-verbal, with
your precision of movement, and I do
mean precision of movement, the more
smart you are going to sound and look.
You talked about the fact that touching
the face for example is a sign of
disconnect and I think it's a sign of
disconnect because if I'm attending to
me
in the course of a conversation then I'm
clearly not attending to you. it it's an
indication of self-consciousness which
is associated with with doubt and fear
and withdrawal and you want to be
talking to someone who's engaged in the
conversation and not self-conscious.
Now, if you're going in to ask for a
raise, you could easily become
self-conscious,
but that would be an indication, I
think, that
the story that you're acting out is all
about you
right now. So, the big five theorists
showed that
self-consciousness and neuroticism were
indistinguishable from one another. So
the rule of thumb, and this is a
terrible rule of thumb, is that if
you're thinking about yourself, you're
miserable.
And and that that probably applies in
some ways across the board.
What you want to be thinking with
thinking about is
what you're going to do for the other
person.
And it has to be real. So, if you're
going to your boss because you want a
raise,
you want to know and then thoroughly
justify the fact that
it's in his or her best interest to give
you a raise. And you need to provide
them with the data that indicate that
that's
self-evident.
Now, you talked about problem solving.
What do you suppose the association is
between
precision of words and precision of
gesture in relationship to competence?
Does it show that you're integrated?
>> Yeah, it shows that
>> that you're focused. What What do you
think it's indicating?
>> Well, if you think of someone who is
highly competent, they know their stuff.
They don't need notes. In other words,
they're so clear on what their idea is
and what either the problem is or the
solution is that they don't have to
waste words. They don't have to waste
movement. And so the clarity is the
indication of the competence. That is
why when people are long-winded or they
are obfuscating the idea, you're like, I
don't know if they really know what
they're talking about. And so clarity, I
think, is a symptom of competence. And
that's why you said I if you don't have
if you need notes on stage, you don't
know your stuff well enough. It's the
same thing I think when we're talking to
a boss. Someone who has a clear idea of
the problem and a clear idea of the
solution. And by the way, this is the
most overlooked one.
knows what they don't know. You can also
have clarity around what you don't know,
right? We're like, huh, I can rely on
you. So, you don't have to know
everything, but you have to know what
you know. So that when you have
precision of word, you're able to
explain the problem, the solution, and
then you can say, you know, the the
biggest question is going to be blank.
Here's how I want to solve that. What I
don't know is this, and here's how I'm
going to find out. That way, you're
showing I know every aspect of this this
problem, even what I don't know.
It's an interesting time for business
with dynamic tariff and trade policies,
squeeze supply chains, and cash flow
tighter than ever. If your business
can't adapt in real time, you're in a
world of hurt. You need total visibility
from global shipments to tariff impacts
to real-time cash flow. That's where
Netswuite by Oracle comes in. Your AI
powered business management suite
trusted by over 42,000 businesses
worldwide. Netswuite stands as the
number one cloud ERP because it brings
everything together, accounting,
financial management, inventory, and HR
into one cohesive suite. No more jumping
between systems or reconciling
conflicting data. With a single source
of truth, you gain the visibility and
control needed to make quick decisions.
The real-time forecasting lets you peer
into the future with actionable data,
helping you stay ahead of challenges.
The AI embedded throughout automates
everyday tasks, allowing your team to
remain strategic while helping you
identify bottlenecks, understanding
their costs and pivot rapidly when
circumstances demand it. In today's
business environment, that kind of
agility is absolutely essential. It's
one system, full control. Transform
complexity into clarity with Netswuite.
If your revenues are at least in the
seven figures, download the free ebook,
Navigating Global Trade: Three Insights
for Leaders at Netswuite.com/jbp.
That's netsweet.com/jbp.
Right. Right. Well, if you're confident
in what you don't know, what you're
doing is indicating to the person that
you're communicating with that you know
the difference between your ability and
your lack of ability, so you won't
overstep. But it also indicates that
you're confident enough in what you know
so that you don't have to exaggerate it.
And that indicates that you genuinely
value what it is that you don't know.
and you're not set back on your heels by
the fact that there's many things that
you have to learn or still can't do.
>> I also think, you know, I love narrative
identity and we're just kind of close to
that topic. So, if I can bring it up
here, we also love people who have a
clear idea of their own story.
And so I I think that going into your
boss, going into a meeting and knowing
how your your identity fits into this
role and how you think it's perfect for
it is really important. That shows a
kind of confidence that we really want
in people. I also think from a mindset
perspective, it's important to go into
your interview, to walk on stage, to
walk into a date thinking you are lucky.
I believe in the power of luck. And if
there's a mindset routine I could I
could suggest gently to folks, you know,
I love a power pose. Sure. You know, I
love, you know, jumping up on a
trampoline. That's all great. But
actually, I think the most powerful
mental warm-up you can do is reminding
yourself of how lucky you are. The luck
factor is has a major impact on how we
come across. If you feel lucky as a
person, it makes you feel more
confident. It fits into your narrative.
and we like people who are lucky. And so
I think that having that idea that
you're the perfect person for this
position, you're in the perfect spot to
get this raise. You're in the perfect
role to be there for your boss. That
perception is also I'm a high neurotic.
And so I have a I have trouble
convincing myself to be optimistic. It
just doesn't really work for me. But I
can I can very firmly believe I'm lucky.
And so I think that luck is sort of a
side door into that into that optimism
that we really need in the confidence in
these interviews.
>> Do you think that that's luck or is it
better characterized potentially as
gratitude?
>> I think
>> right now gratitude is the opposite of
envy. Well,
gratitude means that you've searched the
narrative territory
with regards to the characterization of
this event and that you've found a place
to stand where you're fortunate and
pleased about it. Because you could be
terrified when you go in to ask for a
raise or you could think,
I'm fortunate to have a job.
I'm fortunate enough to be able to I'm
fortunate to be able to communicate with
my boss and I'm fortunate to be in a
position where I could ask for a raise
or a promotion where so there's some
possibility for advancement where I sit
and then you're going to broadcast that.
>> Well, this is a very personal thing. So,
if you don't relate to it, that's fine.
But I think that gratitude in a weird
way reminds me of a scarcity.
So if I think I'm I'm lucky to have this
job. I'm lucky to have what I get. It
almost makes me feel like I need to
settle for what I have versus luck. I
feel a lot more opportunity. There's
opportunity. There's abundance. If I say
I am a lucky person,
there is a an outward focus of maybe
there's more luck to be had versus if I
do a gratitude exercise, it's almost
settling. It's almost like, hey, you're
you're lucky to have what you have. I
don't know if you should ask for
anything more. You know, be grateful for
the role that you have. And so,
emotionally, there's a very subtle
difference in the gratitude exercise
versus luck. I love being grateful, but
there are times where I think gratitude
can almost
stifle
opportunity.
>> Mhm. Well, so maybe what you're pointing
to is the idea that you should be
grateful for the opportunity.
>> There you go.
>> Right. Right. Because that would that
would take away that danger of presuming
that you should be satisfied with what
you have only. Right. I'm satisfied with
what I have, but I want more. What? I
want more opportunity. I want more
adventure. I want more responsibility.
>> I can do more.
>> Right. I want
>> Yeah. Exactly.
>> I can do.
>> Yes. And I think that that's the
attitude to walk into. I can do more.
>> Right. I can do more. And that would be
good for you too to put me in a position
where that was the case. Not least
because I would take a variety of
potential problems off your plate and
because certainly bosses are looking for
that all the time and enable you to do
what you're best at more effectively.
Right? Let's talk about first greetings,
first impressions. So I meet many people
after my lectures. I have a meet and
greet. So, I've probably shaken hands
with
20,000 people in the last
four or five years, maybe more than
that.
Could be 50,000. I'd have to do the
mathematics. But,
and I also learned to pay attention to
this as a therapist because you want to
put people at ease
relatively quickly. The first
impressions matter because they set the
stage, right? So when someone new walks
into your office, if you're a therapist,
you don't want to be thinking, "Oh my
god, here comes another paniply of
problems." You want to be thinking,
"This is going to be interesting and
hopefully I can be helpful to this
person and I would like them to I'd like
to do that as quickly and efficiently as
possible." And it'd be good to get the
ball rolling. That's a good initial
prayer, you might say, to to sort
yourself out. Now, when I watch someone
approach me to shake my hand,
it's like the introduction to a dance.
And so, you have to specify the space.
So, I guess you use your eyes and your
body.
You turn your body towards the person.
You make eye contact with them
and that defines a shared space right
away. And then I match my tempo to their
tempo.
So people will have a characteristic
pace at which they approach. And that's
like the rhythm of their apprehension.
And
if you put your hand out at the same
rate they put their hand out
when you shake hands, then you've
indicated that you attended to them
enough to adopt their tempo immediately.
And then
you shake hands with a firm grip, but
you modulate that like you should have a
default firmness of grip which should be
grip it be tight enough to pick up a
relatively let's say I don't know a 10
pound object something like that and but
you should modulate that in accordance
with the grip strength of the person
that you're communicating with Right?
And then I ask people their name because
even the most nervous person can usually
remember their name. And then
I tell them that I'm happy that the that
they're there and pleased about that and
I mean it. And then that usually
establishes a little bit of
instantaneous intimacy and both players
can walk away
satisfied with the interaction even
though it's brief. So
tell me about introducing yourself and
what's most effective in that regard. I
also wanted to share a little tip that I
learned from Jerry Seinfeld, the
comedian, who said he meets thousands
and thousands of people. And because
he's quite famous, he tends to
intimidate people, which I don't know if
you have that with folks. He has a trick
he uses where he finds if he asks them
too big of a question, they get they get
too nervous. Name is good. He always
then asks a numbersbased question cuz it
kind of accesses a part of the brain
that is very logical. So he'll say, "How
long have you been married?" "How long
have you lived in Toronto?" "How long
have you been here?" "How far away do
you live from the venue?" He asks a
numbers based question, which is like a
way for them to sort of find themselves
to then be able to tell a story about
their marriage or about how they long
how long they live there or how long it
took to get there. So that's a little
tip for anyone who's search talking to a
nervous person. Sometimes numbers can be
good. You know, it's funny. You walked
me through your your introduction
process and there's one piece that you
missed for awkward people. So for
awkward people like me, there's a
terrible moment that happens between eye
contact and greeting which is are we
going to handshake, hug, cheek kiss, or
fist bump or wave? And for an awkward
person, I agonize in those first few
seconds. And if you do it wrong, you're
going to end up in an awkward side hug.
And so what I say to people is I
actually don't want you to match them in
terms of the greeting. I think it's
better to be the assertive one and show
them the kind of greeting you want.
So if you want a handshake, clarity of
signal. We know that human to human, if
I'm going to stick my hand out towards
you and slightly blade my body, I want a
handshake and I'm coming in for a
handshake. If someone doesn't want a
handshake, they'll go like this. They'll
wave at you and then you can change to,
"Oh, yep. Good to see you." So, if I
want a handshake, I'm coming at you the
moment I enter the room. I am morning
Jordan. It's so good to see you. I'm so
happy to see you. Even if that means I
am holding it up. So, clearly signal
this is a handshake. If you want a hug,
and this is for huggers, please, please
keep this in mind. Not everyone is a
hugger. And you don't want to be stuck
in the position of someone going h and
and freezing up of of creating that kind
of prey behavior. So what I recommend if
you want to hug do the open palm. We
recognize universally if someone's
coming at us with two open palms they
are coming in for a more intimate
embrace. If you see fear in their eyes
so the whites of their eyes upper whites
of their eyes show or they take a step
back or taking a deep breath. I want you
to pivot to so good to see you. So,
you're going to start off by showing
that hug cue. You're coming in for the
hug. If they immediately reciprocate it,
great. You're good for a hug. If they
either freeze, hide their hands, slow
down, or show the fear response, you
should then change to a handshake.
That little those two seconds, you have
given them a gift of being clear with
the kind of greeting you want, and
you're going to get more oxytocin from
it. If unwanted touch happens or awkward
touch happens, it's worse than having no
touch at all because you're actually
going to create cortisol. We're going to
make someone stressed or adrenaline even
worse. So, getting ready for that first
touch is a really critical piece. And
then a couple notes on the handshake
because I I think we I I learned growing
up how to handshake. Like my dad sat me
down and said, "Here's how you
handshake." But I'm noticing a lot of my
my younger students, they haven't had
the handshake lesson and they're
handshaking less. So, if I could share,
there's there's a mechanics to a
handshake, which is uh you always want
to offer vertically. So, up and down,
thumb pointed towards the sky. You never
want to offer your hand up. It's a
submissive gesture. You never want to
offer your hand uh palm pointed down.
It's a dominance gesture. So, you're
going to offer it vertical. You're going
to grip them. I always say, I liked
yours your analogy of picking up a 10-
pound object. I say squeeze them like
you're squeezing a peach. So, squeeze
until you feel a little firmness. Right?
You're going to try to squeeze a little
firmness. Then, interestingly, usually
if you're meeting someone for the first
time, it's three pumps. One, two, three.
Nice to meet you. If you already know
someone, often it's one, so good to see
you.
So, if you're thinking about the kind of
mechanics of that, one to three is the
appropriate amount. Um, save the double
clasp for extra warm. So, a lot of
politicians will do that the double
clasp over. That's cuz it's sort of
double the oxytocin. It's on the way to
a hug. I say only do that if you're
super confident in in doing it well.
Otherwise, it's that onetoone up and
down vertical.
>> Right. What are you doing with your
eyes?
>> I like to make mutual eye contact during
the handshake, but I don't want to make
100% eye contact in the first few
minutes of interaction. That's a myth. I
think people are told make more eye
contact. And eye contact is good, but 60
to 70% is ideal. 100% 90% eye contact is
considered invasive or territorial. It's
actually like a pre-fighting kind of a a
a cue. So I it's so make eye contact in
those first few seconds and then you
know you can look around the room.
Welcome. So happy to have you here. When
you're processing you should and feel
free to look away as you're cognitively
processing something. So 60 to 70% eye
contact is great. You don't need to go
more than that.
>> Nonverbal bridges. Let's talk about I
like your analysis of the the meaning of
different distances and also let's talk
a little bit about non-verbal bridges.
>> Yes. So when we look at human
interaction the space between us how we
interact in our environment the fancy
word is proxmics and it's actually quite
important for signaling intimacy. The
reason for this is because what research
shows is that the closer we feel to
someone emotionally, the closer we're
able to get to them physically. And so
oftentimes if you're with a stranger,
they stand further away from you because
they don't feel as close to you. This is
just a a kind of subconscious safety
measure. When we're in interactions,
it's important to take these distances
into account. There are four basic
distances between people. The public
zone, the social zone, the personal
zone, and the intimate zone. The zones
that we should stick in the most are the
personal and the social zone. So 7 feet
away is public, right? We're in in a
room with someone. We're not going to
have a deep conversation with them if
they're 7 ft away. We might say, "Hey,
good to see you. Nice nice to have you
here." Social zone, uh, anywhere from 3
to 5t or four to 7 ft depending on the
culture you're in. That's a great space
for around a boardroom table. Uh,
talking to colleagues in the break room,
having kind of casual friendships at a
bar or a party or networking event.
That's we can have conversation, but
we're not feeling super close to them.
The personal zone, one of my favorite
zones. This is 18 in to about 3 feet
away. That's where we like to have most
of our friendto friend conversations,
our good work conversations. In fact, I
advise people to measure the distance
between their nose and their camera. You
should make sure that your camera is in
that zone, 18 in to 3 ft away. If it's
too close, you hit the intimate zone.
And that's what people are like, whoa.
It's almost the equivalent of a close
talker digitally. So, you want to make
sure that you're not accidentally going
too close 18 inches away with your
camera or in person. A non-verbal bridge
is this idea that I came up with as I
observed people in interaction. I
noticed that as they were getting
closer, they would slowly cross into a
closer zone. But we don't like it when
someone fully steps into the zone. So
instead, there are these non-verbal
bridges that we can actually use to
create intimacy, which is we reach out
and shake hands. The moment we shake
hands, our hands have crossed into the
zone. It's a bridge. Or if I lean
forward, I might just the top of my body
has gone a little bit closer into your
zone to see how it goes. Maybe you scoot
your chair forward. Or maybe you're
gesturing forward. You'll notice that on
like a really good date, my husband and
I love to sit in a restaurant and watch
other people's dates and see if we can
guess how they're going. really good
dates, people are non-verbal bridging
all the time. They're reaching out and
touching each other's arm. They're
reaching and gesturing into each other's
space. They're leaning forward to each
other. They're whispering into someone.
They're saying something a little bit
closer into their ear. That is a way of
warming them up to try to get into that
next zone. I love this when you are
trying to be closer to someone
comfortably. So, leaning is a great
non-verbal bridge. reaching out and
shaking hands or handing someone
something that is a great non-verbal
bridge. Scooting or sitting closer is a
great non-verbal bridge to warm them up.
I work with a lot of physicians and I
share with them you need to do two or
three non-verbal bridges before you have
to go touch someone, right? It's a lot
of times people are nervous around
doctors simply because they're about to
go in their intimate space. And so, uh,
using those can really help warm someone
up to that touch.
>> Talk about close talkers. Close talkers
are breaking a social rule. And we don't
like that for two reasons. One, we do
not like people who are not wellversed
in social etiquette. It makes us
nervous. But second, what they're doing
is they're crossing into the intimate
zone. Close talkers, physically
speaking, are less than 18 in away from
your face. And this is way too close,
too fast usually. But also, there's all
kinds of I think this comes from
actually health reasons. We don't like
it when someone is literally breathing
into our mouth. It it grosses us out.
like just basically we are breathing
their air. We possibly will get their
spittle on our face and that gives us
this kind of ick factor. And so I say to
people if you find that people are
backing away from you, you are likely
accidentally close talking and they're
not ready for it.
>> Right. Right. Well, and one of the last
responses that you want to trigger in
someone is disgust.
You know, that's that's way worse than
fear. It's way worse than anger. Uh,
there's probably not a more destructive
emotion that you can feel in
relationship to someone than than
disgust.
>> Have you heard, Jordan, of the ick
factor? Have you heard of that?
>> Not specifically.
>> What you said is is exactly right.
There's a phrase, it's oh, he gave me
the ick, which means
>> Oh, yes.
>> They someone did something that gave you
that feeling of disgust. And that is the
ultimate crusher of attraction, of
intimacy, of connection. And I think
that sometimes awkward people are
accidentally without realizing it giving
people the ick and that that discuss. So
understanding some of these very small
social rules, the distance between the
difference between 19 in and 18 in is a
big one, right? And so if we can
understand those social rules, you're
not accidentally giving that the ick,
>> right? Well, and you could also allow
the other person to set the distance
requirement rather than you doing it
yourself.
>> Yes. I don't know about you, but when
I'm greeting people at book signings, I
usually plant and I let them decide how
close they want to come to me.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Well, I do that when I meet
people in the meet and greets, too, is
that I'm I'm pretty much stationary,
right? And then they can they can they
can make the adjustment as necessary.
What is there any relationship between
the use of filler words and
unsophisticated
non-verbal behavior?
>> You know, it's funny you asked this. The
research is conflicting. It is actually
not obvious. We think and we're told use
of ums and a's and likes and so and you
knows is bad. It takes away from your
competence. But there's some research
that shows it can be casual. It can be
colloquial. It can show that someone is
not robotic. And so what I say is is if
you're competent in your idea and that
gives you verbal acuity, great. But if
you need to um or have a like or a so
you know, it's not going to destroy your
credibility. Because sometimes we
recognize as humans, ah they're
processing for a moment or they're
gathering that story or um it's a habit,
right? We have this non-verbal pet
peeve. I know some very very competent
influencers who use a lot of fillers and
people still love them and trust them.
So, it's not a deal breaker if it's
authentic to your brand. And I know that
sounds crazy, but I think everyone has a
personal flavor of charisma and there
are certain folks who have those as
their non-verbal signature or their
verbal signature. And if that feels
natural to you and you know your stuff,
I think it's okay.
I wonder if it's a a warmth indicator
but not a competence indicator.
>> Yes. I think that you know the Pratt
fall effect, right? We know that people
who
>> make mistakes are likable. Well, I I
wonder cuz I have struggled with likes
and knows. What if ums verbal fillers
are a pratt fall effect verbally
>> where you're saying I know my stuff but
you're showing a little bit of humanity
and and warmth and vulnerability. It
almost is like ah this person is human
and has mistakes and I can trust them
more.
>> Right. Well, I guess the part of the
problem with extremely high level of
competence is that it's intimidating.
>> Mhm. It leaves us feeling suspicious.
>> And you might think,
yeah, talk about that. talk about that
because you you write about the fact
that leaving
competence with warmth seems to be the
most appropriate strategy. And I guess
the thing about warmth likely and
agreeableness is that it indicates
the probability of reciprocity.
Right? We're in this together. You said
that if you signal warmth, for example,
when you're speaking to your boss, then
what you're showing him or her is that
you're an ally that can be counted on.
And
that's different than competent in the
mechanical sense.
So the use of those fillers that might
be
that's a warmth manifestation.
>> I agree. And I think
>> I guess part of it is Yeah. Go ahead.
Yeah, I I I agree because
when warmth the the outcome of warmth is
you belong here. You are safe with me.
And that allows someone to open up, be
vulnerable. I joke with my highly warm
folks. So if you're very highly warm,
you are constantly signaling warmth with
your verbal, vocal, and non-verbal cues.
And what happens to you? It changes your
whole life because you sit down on a
plane and the person next to you tells
you their entire life story. You cannot
have friendships where people don't
dominate the conversation by by sharing
everything. They verbal vomit all over
you. And that is because you are queuing
everyone. Open up to me. You're safe
here. Tell me everything. And so that is
the symptom of warmth. Warm folks, their
main goal is to be liked. Competent
folks, their main goal is to be right.
Neither of those are right or wrong, but
it plays out differently in
relationships. a warm person who wants
to be liked, they might be taken less
seriously. They're interrupted more. So,
highly warm folks are interrupted more
because they're people think that
they'll be okay with it. Whereas, highly
competent folks, they have a totally
different set of problems. They're told
they're cold, intimidating, hard to talk
to. They have some trouble getting buy
in or getting uh friendships, and that
is because they're so focused on being
right that they're willing to sacrifice
the likability. You know you're in a
relationship with a highly competent
person if they constantly Google fact
check you because they want to make sure
that it's right even if it's going to
offend you. They are more focused on
that. Neither of these are right or
wrong but if you want to get ahead you
have to couch you have to lubricate your
competence with warmth or else you
cannot get buy in.
>> So you said and I guess we should
probably close with this cuz
surprisingly enough this is almost gone
90 minutes already. Um, so I guess
that's the sign of an engrossing
conversation. You said that you were you
intimated that you were awkward and I
suspect competency focused, but perhaps
that's wrong. And you you made a study
of this,
why did you do that? And what did you do
to transform yourself?
>> I had a moment in college. I went to
Emory University and uh my professor
assigned a group paper and I was not
good at working in groups. People made
me nervous and so I went to him in
office hours and I said, "Can I write
double the amount of pages and do it by
myself?"
And he said, "Vanessa, this paper is not
about the technical skills. It's about
the people skills."
And I w I was so overwhelmed. I was
like, I I don't know how. I I know how
to write, but I don't know how to
collaborate. I was never taught that. I
was very focused on the competent side.
And he said to me, listen, why don't you
study for people like you study for
chemistry? Why don't you study
conversation and body language just like
you study for subjects? Soft skills can
be learned even if they don't come
naturally to you. And that is exactly
what I did. In the beginning, I started
reading everything I could on non-verbal
behavior. I read everything I could on
conversation and interpersonal
relationships, the amount of a pause,
how long should a pause be, how many
pumps in a handshake, and I I realized
that actually it freed me.
If I knew the rules of a handshake, I
didn't worry about it. So all of a
sudden, if I understood the blueprint,
the rules of interactions, I no longer
had anxiety about it. So, if I came
prepared with little flashcards of
conversation start orders that I had
memorized, I had no anxiety about the
conversation because I always knew that
I had a question that I could ask in my
literally my back pocket. And so, the
way that I felt transformed was that you
can study soft skills like hard skills
and that if you understand the blueprint
of relationships, it actually gives you
freedom to be able to be more yourself.
And it took many years. I started that
at at age 19. I uh posted my first blog
a couple years later and it went viral.
There was other awkward people out there
who also struggled with conversation and
I posted my very first YouTube video in
2007 when no one knew what YouTube was
about conversation. And there I realized
that other people had this problem. And
so very slowly I started to post more
and also through other awkward people
I've been able to transform. Oh, we're
not alone in this. And there are common
pitfalls that if we know how to avoid
them, we can
>> lay out your books for us. Tell
everybody the titles of your books.
>> Sure. I started with Captivate in 2017.
that is all about first impressions, how
to be memorable, how to create um
lasting relationships through the first
five minutes, the first five hours and
the first five days. That's how I break
down relationships. So, how to turn
strangers into friends, friends into
soulmates or partners. And so, captivate
is a treatise of different people skills
that I think everyone should have. Then,
I came out with Q's in 2022 that was all
the non-verbal behaviors. So, it's 97
different cues non-verbbally, vocally,
and verbally. I also have a last section
on ornaments. I do think ornaments are
quite important. The colors you wear,
the cues behind you in your background,
what you wear, how you wear things, how
you wear your hair, your glasses. So,
there's a small last section on
ornaments, and how that cues warmth and
competence. And then I'm working on my
next book now called Conversation. I
love those Cwords, uh, which is all
about what we're talking about today.
So, working on that right now.
>> And when does conversation come out?
hoping 2026 if I'm on time.
>> If I'm if I'm on time.
>> So, that's a good place to close. I
think I I think what we'll do on the
Daily Wire side is delve more into the
relationship between competence, warmth,
and the big five personality traits. And
so, for everybody who's watching and
listening, you can join us for an
additional 20 minutes or half an hour on
the Daily Wire side.
Is there anything that you'd like to
tell the awkward people in the audience
who are listening in in closing?
>> If you feel underestimated
or overlooked,
that is real and you are not alone. And
there are very specific things you can
do to still feel authentic and make sure
that people actually see you for who you
are and take you seriously.
>> Right. Right. Well, that touches back on
the dichotomy that we opened the
conversation with with which was
it's one thing to be competent, but it's
another thing to have people aboard and
to also have them know that you're
competent. And it's very painful
watching people who
are good at what they do and who have a
lot to bring to the table who are unable
to market themselves. And that's not
deception and it's not advertising. It's
communication. And to be very effective
and successful in your enterprise,
you have to bring something to the
table. But you also have to communicate
the fact that you are bringing something
to the table. Otherwise, you'll be out
there in overlooked hell watching the
glib psychopaths take credit for
everything you do and observing the
enterprise collapse around you in
consequence. So, thank you very much for
sharing your insights with us today.
It's much appreciated. And so we'll put
links up to your books obviously in the
in the description and uh we'll go to
the Daily Wire side and talk about the
big five in relationship to life and
non-verbal behavior.
>> Love it. Thank you so much.
>> Very nice to talk to you. Yep. You bet.
[Music]